Avon Royal Just out of interest, how much of this crap do we have to endure before we can question Brian's suitability for the job?
Just asking.
by roadrunner » 18 Sep 2010 17:22
Avon Royal Just out of interest, how much of this crap do we have to endure before we can question Brian's suitability for the job?
Just asking.
by Avon Royal » 18 Sep 2010 17:28
by paultheroyal » 18 Sep 2010 17:28
by Wimb » 18 Sep 2010 17:31
by sandman » 18 Sep 2010 17:34
Avon Royal Miss, Miss - Avon was nasty to Brian.
FFS.
by howser » 18 Sep 2010 17:39
by Avon Royal » 18 Sep 2010 17:43
sandmanAvon Royal Miss, Miss - Avon was nasty to Brian.
FFS.
You were looking for attention and now you've got it. I'd have thought you'd be happy.
by sandman » 18 Sep 2010 17:45
by Millsy » 18 Sep 2010 17:48
by Avon Royal » 18 Sep 2010 17:51
sandman You asked a question you're getting a whole thread about it. Where is your problem?
by floyd__streete » 18 Sep 2010 18:32
by loyalroyal4life » 18 Sep 2010 18:37
paultheroyal Here we go ....
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 18 Sep 2010 18:40
Avon RoyalsandmanAvon Royal Miss, Miss - Avon was nasty to Brian.
FFS.
You were looking for attention and now you've got it. I'd have thought you'd be happy.
I can hardly contain my joy.
It's wonderful how anyone who even thinks about questioning the almighty Brian is set upon like some sort of heretic.
by Gordons Cumming » 18 Sep 2010 18:43
by RoyalBlue » 18 Sep 2010 18:48
Gordons Cumming Back the manager?
Why not?
by roadrunner » 18 Sep 2010 19:01
Gordons Cumming Back the manager?
Why not?
One defeat and you lot go off on one.
Pathetic.
by retro royal » 18 Sep 2010 19:04
by PEARCEY » 18 Sep 2010 19:06
paultheroyal Here we go ....
by DelBoyRodders » 18 Sep 2010 19:13
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 18 Sep 2010 19:22
RoyalBlueGordons Cumming Back the manager?
Why not?
The person who best deserves to be asked that question is Madejski who seems to have great difficulty backing his pretty able managers with the funds they need to be able to compete effectively at this level. Of course they all say that there aren't players available who can add to what we've already got - presumably they're not too keen to fill the dressing room with monkeys feeding off the peanuts that are available.
And we've lost more than one game but the rose tints presumably obscure the results sheet.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 528 guests