by Vision »
23 Nov 2011 10:17
Hoop Blah Yeah it's a bit selective, but for two reasons.
Firstly I think it shows the current form more than going back the whole length of the season. We'd scored 18 goals in those 15 games, 4 of which were in the freak 6-4 game against Spurs, so 14 in 14 if you exclude that (because I want to!).
I remember it starting to be an issue that I recognised because I remember having discussions about it with my mates when Cox left and we signed Rosenoir as a bit of a panic attempt to resolve the right wing problem.
The second reason being I was looking to prove my point not yours!!
I do agree he probably didn't give us enough time after getting dropped like a stone after his cup performance. I imagine that was because he'd enjoyed his time scoring goals for Swindon, they really wanted him back, and he knew he wasn't going to get a look in under Coppell due to conversations and selections over the previous 18 months or so. It turned out to be the right move for him in the end though.
Well we'll never know if it could have turned out better for him though. Had he stayed then he may have forced his way into our side either before the end oif the season (when the goals did dry up) or the following season where he could conceivably have been playing championship football for us rather than League 1 for Swindon. Who knows how it would have turned out. As things stand he's not that far off the same boat at WBA now then he was when he was here. The stunning irony being that the person in his way now is also arguably the biggest single factor why he never started for us four years previous. All ifs buts and maybes of course.
Think we'll have to agree to disagree to a certain extent or we'll be going round in circles but I've enjoyed the discussion.
The only other things I'd add is that the cup team and the league team were completely seperate entities under Coppell so he wasn't "dropped like a stone" from the League team as he was never in it. I also seem to remember that the talk was of Cox going back out on loan but if he was going to go he wanted a permanent move. Again I wouldn't blame him as such,in fact in some ways its admirable that a player wants to play games,but it would indicate that we didn't want to let him go but wouldn't stand in his way.
There were only 5 subs named in the Premiership back then as well so I also wonder whether if he'd have managed to gain a place on the bench it would have appeased him more.