BFTG - WBA

170 posts
AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23971
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: BFTG - WBA

by AthleticoSpizz » 20 Feb 2016 21:36

#2 ball tomorrow

User avatar
moo
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1764
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:43
Location: Reading

Re: BFTG - WBA

by moo » 20 Feb 2016 21:38

Watford at home I guess we want?

They'll probably rest Ighalo etc

taipairoyal

Re: BFTG - WBA

by taipairoyal » 20 Feb 2016 21:43

Fantastic game,fantastic result, but spoilt by the blatant diving antics of the hapless Rakels (get rid) lucky not to have had a red.

MOTM a hard choice between HRK, Norwood, or Cox.

percy_freeman
Member
Posts: 455
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 20:42
Location: Lurking

Re: BFTG - WBA

by percy_freeman » 20 Feb 2016 21:54

Disagree, but there again this is a discussion forum. Thought Denis did good for someone straight out of Auswitch. 9 for everyone today including us but, Michael Hector 9.9. Kin awesome........

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16831
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: BFTG - WBA

by TBM » 20 Feb 2016 22:00

Royal Ginger HRK excellent
Hector excellent (although their goal came from a huge hole that he possibly should have been standing in)
Gunter very good
Rare nod to the ref, thought he had a good game.

West Brom must hate coming to Reading. For no good reason we've become a real bogey team for them.


Their goal was Norwoods fault

He let Fletcher jog into the space and was nowhere to be seen.


User avatar
blueroyals
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2153
Joined: 02 Sep 2010 02:11

Re: BFTG - WBA

by blueroyals » 20 Feb 2016 22:11

Steve_Upper_West Were you at the game or are you just spouting stats from a website?
Who came closest to scoring Norwood or HRK?
Sometimes a player's drive and attitude lifts the crowd who in turn lift the team... that was HRK today and by the way only a very good save from their keeper prevented Hal scoring in the first half.

Stats can often be used to help make a point.... but it does not necessarily mean that point is correct :wink:


I was at the game and Norwood had a greater contribution to the goals than HRK, so warranted a higher rating

jt_1871
Member
Posts: 104
Joined: 08 Mar 2013 03:10

Re: BFTG - WBA

by jt_1871 » 20 Feb 2016 22:13

blueroyals
Steve_Upper_West Were you at the game or are you just spouting stats from a website?
Who came closest to scoring Norwood or HRK?
Sometimes a player's drive and attitude lifts the crowd who in turn lift the team... that was HRK today and by the way only a very good save from their keeper prevented Hal scoring in the first half.

Stats can often be used to help make a point.... but it does not necessarily mean that point is correct :wink:


I was at the game and Norwood had a greater contribution to the goals than HRK, so warranted a higher rating


what a crock of shite you spout

User avatar
Gunny Fishcake
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1635
Joined: 04 Nov 2005 12:41
Location: West Berkshire

Re: BFTG - WBA

by Gunny Fishcake » 20 Feb 2016 22:20

Very enjoyable afternoon bloody love the FA Cup well played Reading home daw in QF please God

User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12767
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: BFTG - WBA

by paultheroyal » 20 Feb 2016 22:29

Best ground atmosphere since.... Well a very long time.


User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: BFTG - WBA

by Maneki Neko » 20 Feb 2016 22:39

Recovered a bit of our soul today.
Great game. Great perfirmance. Probably the best under brian.
Solid and organised in 1St half didnt give an inch, and created a couple of chances.unlucky to concede. But never looked nack from there.

Alhabsi 8
Gunter 8
Mcshane 8
Cooper 8
Obita 8
Hector 9
Quinn 8
Norwood 8
Cox 7
Rakels 7

taipairoyal

Re: BFTG - WBA

by taipairoyal » 20 Feb 2016 22:40

percy_freeman Disagree, but there again this is a discussion forum. Thought Denis did good for someone straight out of Auswitch. 9 for everyone today including us but, Michael Hector 9.9. Kin awesome........


So you condone the blatant cheating?, could have cost us the game.

taipairoyal

Re: BFTG - WBA

by taipairoyal » 20 Feb 2016 22:43

jt_1871
blueroyals
Steve_Upper_West Were you at the game or are you just spouting stats from a website?
Who came closest to scoring Norwood or HRK?
Sometimes a player's drive and attitude lifts the crowd who in turn lift the team... that was HRK today and by the way only a very good save from their keeper prevented Hal scoring in the first half.

Stats can often be used to help make a point.... but it does not necessarily mean that point is correct :wink:


I was at the game and Norwood had a greater contribution to the goals than HRK, so warranted a higher rating


what a crock of shite you spout


Got to admit a very close call but Norwood just edged it for my motm.

taipairoyal

Re: BFTG - WBA

by taipairoyal » 20 Feb 2016 22:57

Alhabsi 8 Did nothing wrong except the header.
Gunter 9.3
Mcshane 9
Cooper 9
Obita 8
Hector 8
Quinn 9.3
Norwood 9.5 MOTM
Cox 9.4
Rakels 6 Diving could have cost us.
John 7
Vydra 9
Piazon 7
HRK 9.4


User avatar
blueroyals
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2153
Joined: 02 Sep 2010 02:11

Re: BFTG - WBA

by blueroyals » 20 Feb 2016 23:04

jt_1871
blueroyals
Steve_Upper_West Were you at the game or are you just spouting stats from a website?
Who came closest to scoring Norwood or HRK?
Sometimes a player's drive and attitude lifts the crowd who in turn lift the team... that was HRK today and by the way only a very good save from their keeper prevented Hal scoring in the first half.

Stats can often be used to help make a point.... but it does not necessarily mean that point is correct :wink:


I was at the game and Norwood had a greater contribution to the goals than HRK, so warranted a higher rating


what a crock of shite you spout


:shock: :shock: :shock:

2 assists > zero goals zero assists

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7119
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: BFTG - WBA

by Royal Ginger » 20 Feb 2016 23:04

Shame on you MOTD. They start with a piece from a Reading fan asking for them to acknowledge that Reading were good as well as West Brom being bad, which the pundits agree to before spending the whole report talking about West Brom's deficiencies. They could have been playing anyone.

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16831
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: BFTG - WBA

by TBM » 20 Feb 2016 23:15

Royal Ginger Shame on you MOTD. They start with a piece from a Reading fan asking for them to acknowledge that Reading were good as well as West Brom being bad, which the pundits agree to before spending the whole report talking about West Brom's deficiencies. They could have been playing anyone.


Tbf West Brom were shit

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7119
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: BFTG - WBA

by Royal Ginger » 20 Feb 2016 23:20

TBM
Royal Ginger Shame on you MOTD. They start with a piece from a Reading fan asking for them to acknowledge that Reading were good as well as West Brom being bad, which the pundits agree to before spending the whole report talking about West Brom's deficiencies. They could have been playing anyone.


Tbf West Brom were shit

Well yeah, but I'm a Reading fan on the team board so everything is the greatest injustice since OJ.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4923
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: BFTG - WBA

by Lower West » 20 Feb 2016 23:33

TBM
Tbf West Brom were shit


Still a far better team performance than we've seen for a few months.

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11486
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: BFTG - WBA

by bcubed » 20 Feb 2016 23:38

Victor Meldrew Hopefully coingate won't be the big story after a very good win for Reading.
For me Quinn and McShane were our best players today.
Although the goals came from 2 set pieces and a breakaway I felt that we did well to restrict WBA to only about 3 chances in the game and generally we were in control.

I can't agree with snowball about Hector being a (defensive) midfielder-true enough he added steel to that area but IMHO his distribution is not very good so when he goes off to Chelsea and gets loaned somewhere I will be more than happy to see Tish play .

Ultimately credit to Brian for changing things early enough to make a difference but Dennis wide left (following Piazon playing there)didn't really work and I would have liked to have seen him in the middle rather than Cox who tried hard but never looked to be a goal threat.

So that's 14 goals in just 4 FA Cup games compared to 33 in 31 League games-I think I'll just go to FA Cup games in the future especially costing just a fiver (not serious but hopefully our league games will be a bit more exciting).

Who next?
Shrewsbury at home?


Thought Hector was excellent (apart from switching off for their goal - just seen on highlights) and his tackling and intercepting was superb. Also thought his distribution was as good as I have seen .

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: BFTG - WBA

by Ian Royal » 20 Feb 2016 23:41

blueroyals
jt_1871
blueroyals
I was at the game and Norwood had a greater contribution to the goals than HRK, so warranted a higher rating


what a crock of shite you spout


:shock: :shock: :shock:

2 assists > zero goals zero assists


Very good deadball delivery, but there's more to performance than taking a couple of good freekicks. HRK was all over them and a constant threat. He had an excellent game. Norwood was better than recently, but not up to the form he showed in the first half of the season.

170 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ankeny and 377 guests

It is currently 19 Apr 2024 18:04