Royal1988 Firstly, I would like to say etc etc etc
A summary for the "I'm not reading all that" clique = We're screwed.
by Focher » 03 Jun 2016 11:20
by Forbury Lion » 03 Jun 2016 11:28
Royal1988 Firstly, I would like to say etc etc etc
by Forbury Lion » 03 Jun 2016 11:30
by maffff » 03 Jun 2016 11:38
by Forbury Lion » 03 Jun 2016 11:45
by 3points » 03 Jun 2016 12:08
NewCorkSeth Ok my only other question is about royal elm park. The only other club I can think of that did a similar thing is Franchise FC. Hasn't that actually helped them somewhat? They have a fairly quality academy producing some talented youngsters. Could some of this not be put down to the increased income? Dele alli, Brendan Galloway, sheyi ojo there's probably others.. I just think a lot of people are pessimistic (not unreasonably) about this development but it could equally have a positive effect right?
by NewCorkSeth » 03 Jun 2016 12:15
3pointsNewCorkSeth Ok my only other question is about royal elm park. The only other club I can think of that did a similar thing is Franchise FC. Hasn't that actually helped them somewhat? They have a fairly quality academy producing some talented youngsters. Could some of this not be put down to the increased income? Dele alli, Brendan Galloway, sheyi ojo there's probably others.. I just think a lot of people are pessimistic (not unreasonably) about this development but it could equally have a positive effect right?
Another analogy, though not in football, is Wasps. I was involved in that deal and it is currently working perfectly for them. Maximising income, especially outside of match days, which helps support the financial drain of professional sports teams with a view to making money by developing land on or close to the Ricoh Stadium.
by Nameless » 03 Jun 2016 12:23
NewCorkSeth Just a quick point (I'm half way through and may return to add to this later) is Danzell signing indicative of the owners wanting to be in control of transfers or is it our current dutch DOF signing players he's familiar with thus doing his job?
Ok my only other question is about royal elm park. The only other club I can think of that did a similar thing is Franchise FC. Hasn't that actually helped them somewhat? They have a fairly quality academy producing some talented youngsters. Could some of this not be put down to the increased income? Dele alli, Brendan Galloway, sheyi ojo there's probably others.. I just think a lot of people are pessimistic (not unreasonably) about this development but it could equally have a positive effect right?
by Top Flight » 03 Jun 2016 12:30
by genome » 03 Jun 2016 12:36
by Glory Boy » 03 Jun 2016 13:09
Royal1988 I look at the teams in the Championship next year, and can see the top 8 being Newcastle, Norwich, Brentford, Brighton, Cardiff, Derby Ipswich and Sheffield Wednesday. I can also see Wigan, Aston Villa, Birmingham, Preston, QPR, Leeds, Bristol City and Wolves finishing in Mid-table, leaving us to fight it out with Blackburn, Barnsley, Forest, Huddersfield, Fulham, Burton and Rotherham at the bottom. Just surviving relegation next year will be an achievement.
.
by 3points » 03 Jun 2016 13:31
Top Flight I'm sure their intentions are good. But they are making terrible decisions on the footballing side.
Their lack of experience and knowledge is going to get us relegated next season. If what, I think it was Handbags Harris or someone else said about the club also looking to offload Gunter, Williams and Norwood is correct then we are going to be seriously weak next season. The Thais track record at signing players is abysmal and that's when they had money to spend. What they are going to bring in with little or no money doesn't even bare thinking about.
Bet365 are offering 8 to 1 on Reading getting relegated next season. That looks an easy way to profit at the moment.
by Top Flight » 03 Jun 2016 13:49
by Nameless » 03 Jun 2016 13:58
by WoodleyRoyal » 03 Jun 2016 14:16
Nameless how can you assess odds when you have no idea what the strengths of the field are ? You have no idea how strong the vast majority of teams will be, in particular you have no idea what our side will be like.
You cannot base your judgement on any 'knowledge' of how our owners might make decisions because you have no such knowledge, the same as the rest of us.
by Nameless » 03 Jun 2016 14:22
WoodleyRoyalNameless how can you assess odds when you have no idea what the strengths of the field are ? You have no idea how strong the vast majority of teams will be, in particular you have no idea what our side will be like.
You cannot base your judgement on any 'knowledge' of how our owners might make decisions because you have no such knowledge, the same as the rest of us.
You're becoming very annoying Nameless, and the need for you to post on every topic is also quite tedious. We already have one Ian Royal there isn't room for two...
by WoodleyRoyal » 03 Jun 2016 14:29
by Nameless » 03 Jun 2016 14:32
WoodleyRoyal Nameless, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
by Top Flight » 03 Jun 2016 14:41
Nameless how can you assess odds when you have no idea what the strengths of the field are ? You have no idea how strong the vast majority of teams will be, in particular you have no idea what our side will be like.
You cannot base your judgement on any 'knowledge' of how our owners might make decisions because you have no such knowledge, the same as the rest of us.
by Sutekh » 03 Jun 2016 15:03
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Hendo, Vision, WestYorksRoyal and 340 guests