by PistolPete » 03 Aug 2019 22:22
by NewCorkSeth » 03 Aug 2019 22:44
by PistolPete » 03 Aug 2019 23:04
NewCorkSeth Why do you write his name as Rinho? The "H" comes after the "M". Surely Rino makes more sense as a shortened version?
by NewCorkSeth » 04 Aug 2019 07:23
PistolPeteNewCorkSeth Why do you write his name as Rinho? The "H" comes after the "M". Surely Rino makes more sense as a shortened version?
Edited it - that was pretty thick of me
by windermereROYAL » 04 Aug 2019 14:53
by PistolPete » 04 Aug 2019 15:05
windermereROYAL Eza would be a perfect fit in this team, if we cant bring the other back we should have gone for him again. cant understand why Gomes didn't want him, from the little we saw of him hes a bloody good player at this level.
by Lower West » 04 Aug 2019 15:27
by Snowball » 04 Aug 2019 20:58
NewCorkSethPistolPeteNewCorkSeth Why do you write his name as Rinho? The "H" comes after the "M". Surely Rino makes more sense as a shortened version?
Edited it - that was pretty thick of me
I'm sure you were not alone. A lot of people struggle with names on here.
by Snowflake Royal » 04 Aug 2019 21:08
SnowballNewCorkSethPistolPete
Edited it - that was pretty thick of me
I'm sure you were not alone. A lot of people struggle with names on here.
For me it's RHINO. Fits the player perfectly.
by NewCorkSeth » 04 Aug 2019 21:13
Snowflake RoyalSnowballNewCorkSeth I'm sure you were not alone. A lot of people struggle with names on here.
For me it's RHINO. Fits the player perfectly.
Harsh to describe him as dull witted, flatulent, aggressive, blinkered and at the end of his time.
by SCIAG » 04 Aug 2019 21:49
NewCorkSethSnowflake RoyalSnowball
For me it's RHINO. Fits the player perfectly.
Harsh to describe him as dull witted, flatulent, aggressive, blinkered and at the end of his time.
Harsh on Rhinos.
by PistolPete » 04 Aug 2019 22:15
by paultheroyal » 05 Aug 2019 14:45
StellaPlease Paul fluked one prediction in the form of the Chelsea friendly and has got everything else spectacularly wrong. He dips in and out trying to give the impression that he's in the know, when in fact he knows absolutely nothing, as has been proved.
paultheroyalStellaPlease Paul fluked one prediction in the form of the Chelsea friendly and has got everything else spectacularly wrong. He dips in and out trying to give the impression that he's in the know, when in fact he knows absolutely nothing, as has been proved.
Chelsea game, tick
Home kit, tick
Training kit, tick
Ejaria, tick,
Oliviera debacle, tick
Howe, tick
Other news, tick
I’d agree mate with one thing. Your use of the word spectacular. Cheers.
You talk bollocks mate. Jealousy is not an attractive feature.
X
by paultheroyal » 05 Aug 2019 15:10
StellaPleasepaultheroyalStellaPlease Paul fluked one prediction in the form of the Chelsea friendly and has got everything else spectacularly wrong. He dips in and out trying to give the impression that he's in the know, when in fact he knows absolutely nothing, as has been proved.
Chelsea game, tick
Home kit, tick
Training kit, tick
Ejaria, tick,
Oliviera debacle, tick
Howe, tick
Other news, tick
I’d agree mate with one thing. Your use of the word spectacular. Cheers.
You talk bollocks mate. Jealousy is not an attractive feature.
X
I'm going to have you ask you to calm down there bust briefly
You guessed we'd be playing in blue and white, and that Oliviera was a done deal, 100%.
paultheroyalStellaPleasepaultheroyal
Chelsea game, tick
Home kit, tick
Training kit, tick
Ejaria, tick,
Oliviera debacle, tick
Howe, tick
Other news, tick
I’d agree mate with one thing. Your use of the word spectacular. Cheers.
You talk bollocks mate. Jealousy is not an attractive feature.
X
I'm going to have you ask you to calm down there bust briefly
You guessed we'd be playing in blue and white, and that Oliviera was a done deal, 100%.
None of those 2 sentences make sense. You ok?
However, I will take a guess of sorts at your second sentence.
I had all the features of the kit without clearly stating I had seen it first hand some weeks before. Oliviera deal was very much on, but due to everything we know about, we couldn’t match a firm offer on the table and off he went. As mentioned on here.
by paultheroyal » 05 Aug 2019 16:37
StellaPleasepaultheroyalStellaPlease
I'm going to have you ask you to calm down there bust briefly
You guessed we'd be playing in blue and white, and that Oliviera was a done deal, 100%.
None of those 2 sentences make sense. You ok?
However, I will take a guess of sorts at your second sentence.
I had all the features of the kit without clearly stating I had seen it first hand some weeks before. Oliviera deal was very much on, but due to everything we know about, we couldn’t match a firm offer on the table and off he went. As mentioned on here.
But you said Oliviera was a done deal, which it wasn't.
Look, this clearly means a lot to you, so I'll leave you with it. Just pointing out that you're very rarely correct.
paultheroyalStellaPleasepaultheroyal
None of those 2 sentences make sense. You ok?
However, I will take a guess of sorts at your second sentence.
I had all the features of the kit without clearly stating I had seen it first hand some weeks before. Oliviera deal was very much on, but due to everything we know about, we couldn’t match a firm offer on the table and off he went. As mentioned on here.
But you said Oliviera was a done deal, which it wasn't.
Look, this clearly means a lot to you, so I'll leave you with it. Just pointing out that you're very rarely correct.
And then said the deal was wobbling... keep up
Like I said, truth hurts x
by Hound » 05 Aug 2019 19:31
by Hound » 05 Aug 2019 19:35
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 394 guests