MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

439 posts
User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39832
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Snowflake Royal » 21 Nov 2020 13:27

We're back to soaking up pressure and breaking. I think we defend really well when we pack our third and squeeze the space.

The last few games most of he goals seem to have come when the play is more stretched and we're under less sustained pressure. I wouldn't necessarily go so far as to say they've all been breakaway or counter attack goals... but I'm not sure this improvement is a sign that Moore being back fixed the problem so much as the game and way it's played is more to our advantage.

JR
Member
Posts: 843
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 12:53

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by JR » 21 Nov 2020 13:28

Snowflake Royal
Zip That was a clear red card. Begovic was nowhere near the ball.

It looked a fairly genuine attempt to win the ball, that he fluffed and then continued to flap into Semedo.

Semedo was kinda going away from goal.

On minute 4 I think you will never see a keeper sent off for that.

Got a bit worried we were going to give one away then.

One isn't likely to be enough.


This is one of those situations that you don’t ever consider until happens and the rules aren’t clear how they apply.

So I agree his initial attempt was to try and get the ball. But the second movement that gave away the pen had no chance of getting the ball, so should it be red?

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Zip » 21 Nov 2020 13:28

That second goal was outstanding one touch football. As good as we will score all season.

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Zip » 21 Nov 2020 13:29

So should Kelly have gone for the foul on Aluko?

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9519
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by NewCorkSeth » 21 Nov 2020 13:30

Zip So should Kelly have gone for the foul on Aluko?

Did he actually touch him?


User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Zip » 21 Nov 2020 13:31

NewCorkSeth
Zip So should Kelly have gone for the foul on Aluko?

Did he actually touch him?


There seemed a little bit of contact. Not sure it was enough to be considered a foul.

Notts Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1018
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 00:07

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Notts Royal » 21 Nov 2020 13:32

I agree that regardless of the outcome today, this proves we are a decent side. I don’t expect us to necessarily win promotion, as we have too many inconsistent players (at this moment in their careers), but top 10.

Fantastic build up for that goal - brilliant from Ejaria. Still prefer Olise’s overall contribution to a game but Ejaria does have those moments of magic.

Great finish from Aluko!

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39832
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Snowflake Royal » 21 Nov 2020 13:32

JR
Snowflake Royal
Zip That was a clear red card. Begovic was nowhere near the ball.

It looked a fairly genuine attempt to win the ball, that he fluffed and then continued to flap into Semedo.

Semedo was kinda going away from goal.

On minute 4 I think you will never see a keeper sent off for that.

Got a bit worried we were going to give one away then.

One isn't likely to be enough.


This is one of those situations that you don’t ever consider until happens and the rules aren’t clear how they apply.

So I agree his initial attempt was to try and get the ball. But the second movement that gave away the pen had no chance of getting the ball, so should it be red?

By the letter maybe, although I'm not 100% on how the rules differ for keepers... I'm not convinced it was a clear goalscoring opportunity given the direction Semedo was moving, the distance the ball went and where the defender was.

But I've only seen it once. I just don't think you'll see many refs give red for that, especially early on. It's got to be really blatant for a keeper to go these days it seems.

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9519
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by NewCorkSeth » 21 Nov 2020 13:32

Zip
NewCorkSeth
Zip So should Kelly have gone for the foul on Aluko?

Did he actually touch him?


There seemed a little bit of contact. Not sure it was enough to be considered a foul.

My stream was a bit jittery but the replay looked like they barely touched. Looked more like Aluko moved to avoid contact. I dunno.


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39832
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Snowflake Royal » 21 Nov 2020 13:34

NewCorkSeth
Zip So should Kelly have gone for the foul on Aluko?

Did he actually touch him?

Don't know what incident zip is talking about. Seen nothing that comes close to another red incident.

User avatar
Jagermesiter1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3710
Joined: 25 Jul 2010 01:59

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Jagermesiter1871 » 21 Nov 2020 13:35

Notts Royal I agree that regardless of the outcome today, this proves we are a decent side. I don’t expect us to necessarily win promotion, as we have too many inconsistent players (at this moment in their careers), but top 10.

Fantastic build up for that goal - brilliant from Ejaria. Still prefer Olise’s overall contribution to a game but Ejaria does have those moments of magic.

Great finish from Aluko!


Who are you trying to kid? We all know we are all but up already.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24971
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Hound » 21 Nov 2020 13:35

Snowflake Royal
NewCorkSeth
Zip So should Kelly have gone for the foul on Aluko?

Did he actually touch him?

Don't know what incident zip is talking about. Seen nothing that comes close to another red incident.


When he went through from the Joao flick

WAsnt a foul.

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Zip » 21 Nov 2020 13:36

Snowflake Royal
NewCorkSeth
Zip So should Kelly have gone for the foul on Aluko?

Did he actually touch him?

Don't know what incident zip is talking about. Seen nothing that comes close to another red incident.


It was being discussed by the SKY pundits. Relating to Aluko running through with Kelly just outside the penalty area.


User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Zip » 21 Nov 2020 13:37

Hound
Snowflake Royal
NewCorkSeth Did he actually touch him?

Don't know what incident zip is talking about. Seen nothing that comes close to another red incident.


When he went through from the Joao flick

WAsnt a foul.


The SKY pundits thought it was

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9519
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by NewCorkSeth » 21 Nov 2020 13:38

Zip
Hound
Snowflake Royal Don't know what incident zip is talking about. Seen nothing that comes close to another red incident.


When he went through from the Joao flick

WAsnt a foul.


The SKY pundits thought it was

Did they? That doesn't speak very highly of them. Either way, if it was, no ref could have spotted a touch that light.

Simmops
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14669
Joined: 04 Sep 2019 09:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Simmops » 21 Nov 2020 13:39

Zip That second goal was outstanding one touch football. As good as we will score all season.


But apparently Aluko is still shit right :roll:

Notts Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1018
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 00:07

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Notts Royal » 21 Nov 2020 13:42

Just how good a signing has Josh Laurent been? Absolutely superb

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39832
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Snowflake Royal » 21 Nov 2020 13:43

NewCorkSeth
Zip
Hound
When he went through from the Joao flick

WAsnt a foul.


The SKY pundits thought it was

Did they? That doesn't speak very highly of them. Either way, if it was, no ref could have spotted a touch that light.
looked like nothing to me.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39832
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Snowflake Royal » 21 Nov 2020 13:44

Notts Royal Just how good a signing has Josh Laurent been? Absolutely superb

Yep really shining today.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39832
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bournemouth (a) sponsored by Jimmy Quinn

by Snowflake Royal » 21 Nov 2020 13:46

Not a lot in that, but ref had literally just had a word with Rino.

439 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, ankeny, Bing [Bot], Biscuit goalie and 401 guests

It is currently 19 Apr 2024 11:44