Some Hob Nobbers comment with player ratings after a game and some don’t ,fair enough.What level of performance do your numbers signify ?
Here’s my version:
10 Just about perfect.Got the points virtually on their own.Rarely given.
9 Excellent.Take a bow.
8 Very ,very good.No faults and some match defining moments.
7 Good.Deserves his inflated salary.Every player should aim for this.But such consistency across a whole season just about impossible.
6 Average. Did ok.Did their job.No more and no less.6 seems to be an average score across most fan zones.
5 Below par,but not embarrassing and not a serious liability.
4 Poor.They weren’t a disaster,but usually they have done something stupid or have struggled throughout.
3 Dont deserve their salary,and are in danger of being dropped for a long time.Lot of mistakes and really couldn’t cope.
2 Stunk the place out with what they are trying to do.Hardly got anything right.
1 Not only did they stink the place out,they didn’t try either.
0 Like 10;hopefully rarely given.So bad that they are an embarrassment and a couple of those in a row and we really don’t want to see them wear the shirt again.
TBF 4,3 and 2 ratings can be very close.Depends how bad the overall team performance is and if we lose badly.I am as guilty as anyone in not waiting a couple of hours after a game before applying individual ratings,as I usually feel so down after a loss.It is interesting how different fans rate a performance.There is a tendency to give a favourite player a higher rating,than say a player how you cannot be persuaded is anything other than useless.