by genome » 30 Jan 2021 10:06
by Hound » 30 Jan 2021 10:08
HendoHound We were excellent but can’t get over how bad Bournemouth were esp in the first half
How much must they have spent on Danjuma, Solanke, Billing, Brooks, Lerma (£30m? Bloody hell), Mepham, Rico, Kelly etc. Bar Brooks they were all utterly woeful
With no doubts huge wages for King, Begovic and others they can’t hope to sustain that side unless they go back up
Lerma and Billing - were particularly desperately poor. Prancing round the pitch. Absolutely rinsed by our freebie Laurent and Rino
That Billing was oxf*rd dreadful.
by Hendo » 30 Jan 2021 10:10
genome Apparently Bournemouth's starting XI last night was worth £121m
Ours was £8m
by Hendo » 30 Jan 2021 10:10
HoundHendoHound We were excellent but can’t get over how bad Bournemouth were esp in the first half
How much must they have spent on Danjuma, Solanke, Billing, Brooks, Lerma (£30m? Bloody hell), Mepham, Rico, Kelly etc. Bar Brooks they were all utterly woeful
With no doubts huge wages for King, Begovic and others they can’t hope to sustain that side unless they go back up
Lerma and Billing - were particularly desperately poor. Prancing round the pitch. Absolutely rinsed by our freebie Laurent and Rino
That Billing was oxf*rd dreadful.
Just trotted round the pitch at half pace and looks incredibly weak for a lad of 6ft5
by Hound » 30 Jan 2021 10:11
genome Apparently Bournemouth's starting XI last night was worth £121m
Ours was £8m
by genome » 30 Jan 2021 10:13
Hendogenome Apparently Bournemouth's starting XI last night was worth £121m
Ours was £8m
Only 2 players in the starting lineup cost a fee (if I’m correct...) Ovie and Joao. Even with our 5 subs, only one other player cost a fee and that was Aluko.
by Hound » 30 Jan 2021 10:16
genomeHendogenome Apparently Bournemouth's starting XI last night was worth £121m
Ours was £8m
Only 2 players in the starting lineup cost a fee (if I’m correct...) Ovie and Joao. Even with our 5 subs, only one other player cost a fee and that was Aluko.
Yep, the rest were frees or academy players.
by Greatwesternline » 30 Jan 2021 10:24
by Zip » 30 Jan 2021 10:43
HendoWestYorksRoyalZip
Brooks made a big difference when he came on. Glad he didn’t start.
Brooks looked quality, as he did in the away fixture. Apart from that, a rancid record of overpriced poor recruitment. No wonder they came down.
Had Brooks just come back from injury? If not, it is odd he didn’t start as he looked their best player by some margin.
by leon » 30 Jan 2021 10:47
St PaulileonSt Pauli
Didn’t think there were that many potential yellows that weren’t given. The 3:1 victory is testament to that. Had Bournemouth been cynical and dirty like Preston we’d not have scored 3.
They played sportingly and lost 3:1.
You’re apparently German so your concept of sporting behaviour leaves a lot to be desired.
On reflection there was I think two (2) dodgy challenges in the air that the ref didn’t give cards for and one was in the first 5 minutes when cards are rarely given and the ref did pull the player up for it.
Perhaps my assessment of it was in the absolute horror show served up by Preston and their ref.
No need to subject me to your Friday night drunken racist abuse though Leon.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2021 11:07
genome Apparently Bournemouth's starting XI last night was worth £121m
Ours was £8m
by Singing Defective » 30 Jan 2021 11:13
by Nameless » 30 Jan 2021 11:13
Snowflake Royalgenome Apparently Bournemouth's starting XI last night was worth £121m
Ours was £8m
Worth is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.
by Hound » 30 Jan 2021 11:13
Greatwesternline The big spending must still be continuing though in the form of wages. Meite Puskas Aluko Moore Joao Swift all probably on large salaries.
by 3points » 30 Jan 2021 11:13
by WestYorksRoyal » 30 Jan 2021 11:16
NamelessSnowflake Royalgenome Apparently Bournemouth's starting XI last night was worth £121m
Ours was £8m
Worth is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.
It says ‘was’ rather than ‘is’ !
I read that if bmouth don’t go up this year they are financially stuffed.
Of course us getting promotion would iron out one or two financial wrinkles as well.
by windermereROYAL » 30 Jan 2021 11:17
by Hendo » 30 Jan 2021 11:18
WestYorksRoyalNamelessSnowflake Royal Worth is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.
It says ‘was’ rather than ‘is’ !
I read that if bmouth don’t go up this year they are financially stuffed.
Of course us getting promotion would iron out one or two financial wrinkles as well.
Especially as they sold their most saleable assets already in Ake and Wilson. They may be able to sell Brooks, but who else will get a good fee to substantially help their finances?
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2021 11:20
by Snowball » 30 Jan 2021 11:21
genome Apparently Bournemouth's starting XI last night was worth £121m
Ours was £8m
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 333 guests