Tried & tested or experimental?

4 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
Eaststandman
Member
Posts: 665
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 09:50

Tried & tested or experimental?

by Eaststandman » 24 Jan 2022 19:16

Given that we are in a relegation battle, I'm wondering if people have a preference for either, a: Tackling it with a tried & tested approach or b: a wildly experimental one?

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39401
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Tried & tested or experimental?

by Snowflake Royal » 24 Jan 2022 19:33

A plan rather than no plan would be nice. But tried and tested makes sense. Unless you mean continue with the horseshit that Pauno has tried and tested to be a failure.

Eaststandman
Member
Posts: 665
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 09:50

Re: Tried & tested or experimental?

by Eaststandman » 24 Jan 2022 21:56

Paulo is definitely going with experimental, avant garde even, signing an inexperienced keeper, no matter how talented or how much potential he may have is hardly a tried & tested method. I'm begining to think he may be an undercover agent for the other teams in the relegation struggle. These actions could undermine Southwood's progress and development and its just another example of what happens when we keep giving him the opportunity to make things worse!

Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10022
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: Running from The Left

Re: Tried & tested or experimental?

by Millsy » 25 Jan 2022 09:59

As Pauno has said 1.5 years in he's decided he's now in Preseason phase and has started experimenting.

Starting last Saturday it's been going well so far, Puscas has finally scored.

4 posts   •   Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Bing [Bot], East Grinstead Royal, Google Adsense [Bot], morganb, WestYorksRoyal and 372 guests

It is currently 28 Mar 2024 19:38