by winchester_royal » 15 Aug 2009 19:45
by moo » 15 Aug 2009 19:47
by Arch » 15 Aug 2009 19:48
by Gordons Cumming » 15 Aug 2009 19:48
by brendywendy » 15 Aug 2009 19:50
by Avon Royal » 15 Aug 2009 19:53
Arch There are quite a few posters on this board who absolutely live for days like this. They love nothing more than the sound of their own whining. We're getting lengthy, self-congratulating diatribes from people who were absolutely silent - not so much as a peep - during the good years. There will not be perspective. Where's the thrill in that?
by 2.8 lita injection » 15 Aug 2009 19:53
by Sir Dodger Royal » 15 Aug 2009 19:57
by Archies Volley II » 15 Aug 2009 19:58
moo What if they dont 'come good'?
Whats plan B?
by winchester_royal » 15 Aug 2009 20:00
Sir Dodger Royal Listen. If you are in the Championship it is all about competing. We are not and having paid good money then people expect a team to be competitive.
This team isn't and needs improving nowwwwwwwwww
Once you are bottom three after a couple of months with kids it is difficult to get out. Ask Saints fans. They know SDR is spot on as usual. You know it mkaes senseeeeee
by moo » 15 Aug 2009 20:01
Archies Volley IImoo What if they dont 'come good'?
Whats plan B?
Introduce some experience into the starting team maybe
Say players like N. Hunt, Harper, Ingi - once they are fully match fit after missing most / all of pre-season
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Aug 2009 20:03
by Sarah Star » 15 Aug 2009 20:04
2.8 lita injection I am realistic, with these kids i think we will finish in the bottom half but the spin coming from the OS is telling me something different which cant be right.
by PEARCEY » 15 Aug 2009 20:05
winchester_royalSir Dodger Royal Listen. If you are in the Championship it is all about competing. We are not and having paid good money then people expect a team to be competitive.
This team isn't and needs improving nowwwwwwwwww
Once you are bottom three after a couple of months with kids it is difficult to get out. Ask Saints fans. They know SDR is spot on as usual. You know it mkaes senseeeeee
You think you've been proven right because of one loss against the best team in the division??
You are LOLaughable.
I suppose the same muppets spouting their negative bollocks, are the ones doing the same thing after the Plymouth match in 05/06.
I look forward to revisiting this thread in May.
by brendywendy » 15 Aug 2009 20:06
by 2.8 lita injection » 15 Aug 2009 20:09
Sarah Star2.8 lita injection I am realistic, with these kids i think we will finish in the bottom half but the spin coming from the OS is telling me something different which cant be right.
Where's the spin? Even they say we were outclassed and should have done better.
by Arch » 15 Aug 2009 20:10
FiNeRaIn I don't blame the players- not their fault they've been chucked in at the deep end. I was encouraged from bits I saw at forest- a team really at our level last week although there was room for improvement. I respect BR for taking the youngsters approach and im happy with the era we are under.
However, you cannot walk into a game with against a multi million pound ex prem team with experienced players and play your youth academy. It was really poor management to leave harper, marek and even mills on the bench today, we needed more experience. Really poor from BR. To add to that, its farcical we still haven't got a recognised striker going into the third game of the season, if this is not adressed quickly I expect we'll be in a relegation battle.
I am still optimistic as like our young players BR will learn, but seriously it was poor today and we looked a bad, inexperienced side at times.
by tee peg » 15 Aug 2009 20:12
by Sarah Star » 15 Aug 2009 20:16
2.8 lita injectionSarah Star2.8 lita injection I am realistic, with these kids i think we will finish in the bottom half but the spin coming from the OS is telling me something different which cant be right.
Where's the spin? Even they say we were outclassed and should have done better.
The spin since Rogers was appointed, i could list them all but i would get very tired but take our first game as an example, the OS said we dominated, we didnt.
I have read stories that Alex Pearce reminds him of John Terry, i may come accross as negative but i feel the attraction of Rogers to mr M is his way with words.
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Aug 2009 20:19
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers and 505 guests