by Royal Spangle » 20 Aug 2009 16:40
by readingbedding » 20 Aug 2009 17:16
by Royal Spangle » 20 Aug 2009 18:15
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 20 Aug 2009 18:16
by readingbedding » 20 Aug 2009 18:43
Royal Spangle not position wise....... size wise
by MeMeMe » 20 Aug 2009 19:30
by Deathy » 20 Aug 2009 19:34
Royal Spangle :lol: I remember when we was in the Prem when Hammond said we would be a top 10 club in the country how ridiculous does that sound now(actually it sounded rediculous at the time as well
by Woodcote Royal » 20 Aug 2009 22:28
leonWoodcote Royalleon ....
but that's why he was hired - he was willing to have his team sold off from under him because he thought he could replace them with the kids that he worked with. The other option was staying at Watford and having the same happen but without the kids...
The competition for who can make the thickest post of the week is clearly gaining momentum.
The team being sold off is Coppell's...................that's the one that was costing as much as 30k a week per player and produced relegation form in the last half of last season but why let facts get in the way of yet another pathetic attempt to blame the chairman for failures on the pitch.
wtf are you talking about? It's BR's team - all of it not just the ones he bought - doesnt matter where they came from??
Prior to taking the job, BR would have discussed with JM the future ie having to cut costs by reducing the wage bill, and using more of the youngsters.
BR would have weighed up his options ie facing the same thing at Watford but without such a strong backbone of youth coming through (or not - that's the big question). Hence this was his best bet.
That was my point. Was it that difficult to understand?
by leon » 21 Aug 2009 01:43
by Woodcote Royal » 21 Aug 2009 03:59
leon We're playing a team of academy and young players. Whilst selling off the spine of senior players ie Hanneman, Bikey, Hunt, Doyle - and this is KEY
How could you be anything else when trying to justify this garbageleon so CONFUSED
leon HINT 3
Yes??? and your point is what?????
Donkey Lover 2 and Bushes Bernal would do the RFC job ffs
JM has hired someone who will sell off the expensive players and cut costs, but build for the future.
If you disagree with this then fine.That is my opinion - I have been supporting this club for many years and only want the best for it.
by Royal Lady » 21 Aug 2009 08:42
Woodcote Royalleon We're playing a team of academy and young players. Whilst selling off the spine of senior players ie Hanneman, Bikey, Hunt, Doyle - and this is KEY
Well done!!!................that would be the spine of Steve Coppell's team who Brendan Rodgers has shown no sign of wishing to use as part of his first team ahead of the younger players..................which is why both Harper and Marek have not got beyond the bench in the league but started and played the full 90 minutes in the cup.
by ROKERITE » 21 Aug 2009 09:24
by ZacNaloen » 21 Aug 2009 09:29
Royal LadyWoodcote Royalleon We're playing a team of academy and young players. Whilst selling off the spine of senior players ie Hanneman, Bikey, Hunt, Doyle - and this is KEY
Well done!!!................that would be the spine of Steve Coppell's team who Brendan Rodgers has shown no sign of wishing to use as part of his first team ahead of the younger players..................which is why both Harper and Marek have not got beyond the bench in the league but started and played the full 90 minutes in the cup.
Royalee and Hoop Blah - PLEASE READ THE ABOVE.
Isn't that what I said?
by brendywendy » 21 Aug 2009 09:31
Royal Spangle :lol: I remember when we was in the Prem when Hammond said we would be a top 10 club in the country how ridiculous does that sound now(actually it sounded rediculous at the time as well
by Royal Rother » 21 Aug 2009 10:09
DeathyRoyal Spangle :lol: I remember when we was in the Prem when Hammond said we would be a top 10 club in the country how ridiculous does that sound now(actually it sounded rediculous at the time as well
Sadly, and frustratingly, with funding we could well have been. We had the manager, we certainly had the team.
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 21 Aug 2009 11:34
Forbury LionMadejski has many investments and oppourtunities. Like a good businessman he will invest the most in the ones with the best high/guaranteed return split.Forest Gump .... goes on it seems. We need someone who - for the good of the club - will tell Madejski that he is wrong not to invest.
Perhaps economics will see a change in investment - How are the other businesses in the Madejski portfolio coping in these difficult times? Perhaps he's concentrating his cash on the development of Station Hill.... yet that could be a white elephant now thanks to the property slump.
by Gus the teenage cow » 21 Aug 2009 11:40
ROKERITE I think Rodgers was a cracking appointment. I believe the future is looking bright for Reading, though it may be next season before a serious promotion challenge is mounted.
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 21 Aug 2009 11:55
ROKERITE I think Rodgers was a cracking appointment. I believe the future is looking bright for Reading, though it may be next season before a serious promotion challenge is mounted.
by leon » 21 Aug 2009 19:19
Woodcote Royal As a fellow long term supporter, I urge you strongly to spend a few weeks in a darkened room or call your GP without delay.
Users browsing this forum: One Beer is never enough. and 486 guests