by floyd__streete » 08 Sep 2009 23:39
by handbags_harris » 08 Sep 2009 23:43
by floyd__streete » 08 Sep 2009 23:51
by Winchester Royal » 08 Sep 2009 23:53
by Alivey » 09 Sep 2009 00:00
by Maguire » 09 Sep 2009 00:22
by yappy » 09 Sep 2009 00:23
floyd__streete Be honest, do you ever refer to the club by our nickname in conversation?
"Are you going to the Royals game Saturday?"
"I see the Royals have signed Jobi McAnuff"
etc.
No, of course you bloody don't.
by Compo's Hat » 09 Sep 2009 00:55
by Ian Royal » 09 Sep 2009 01:41
by prostak » 09 Sep 2009 02:39
by seahawk10 » 09 Sep 2009 05:03
by Avon Royal » 09 Sep 2009 06:44
seahawk10 Royals is safely mid-table. Not the best but certainly not the worst.
Worse than:
Villains, Pompey, Black Cats, Reds, Blades, Wolves, Rovers, Foxes, Daggers.
Better than:
Chairboys, The Shrimps, Hatters, Bees, Cherries, The Gas Pirates, The Red Imps, The Poppies.
by Ryn » 09 Sep 2009 07:22
by leww_rfc » 09 Sep 2009 07:38
by Dirk Gently » 09 Sep 2009 07:58
by Sarah Star » 09 Sep 2009 08:29
Dirk Gently Something more appropriate these days would be to do with our middle-classsness, although that's proclaimed across the front of the shirts for everyone to see anyway.
by BarryWhiteRFC » 09 Sep 2009 08:31
seahawk10 Royals is safely mid-table. Not the best but certainly not the worst.
Worse than:
Villains, Pompey, Black Cats, Reds, Blades, Wolves, Rovers, Foxes, Daggers.
Better than:
Chairboys, The Shrimps, Hatters, Bees, Cherries, The Gas Pirates, The Red Imps, The Poppies.
by East Grinstead Royal » 09 Sep 2009 08:46
by (.)Boobies(.) » 09 Sep 2009 09:01
floyd__streete Be honest, do you ever refer to the club by our nickname in conversation?
"Are you going to the Royals game Saturday?"
"I see the Royals have signed Jobi McAnuff"
etc.
No, of course you bloody don't. Supporters of some clubs are proud of their nickname, so much so that they more often than not refer to the team/club as such, ie. Saints, Pompey. You might hear a muted come on you Royals droned when we get a corner, but as a nickname it is lame, limp and rarely used. Not to mention undeserving; Reading hasn't always been the county town of Royal Berkshire and although Henry I was buried at Reading Abbey that would seem a pretty spurious claim to royal fame compared to many other towns and cities in the UK, besides which Windsor & Eton FC are surely more deserving of their nickname The Royalists.
As I understand it, the nickname was chosen following an Evening Post competition after Huntley & Palmers closed down. I doubt that they still make hats in Luton, so why couldn't we still be known as The Biscuitmen? It is unique and one of the very few quirky things about our bland town that most outsiders would know about us. As far as I am concerned, the rather dire nickname of The Royals only really serves to suit lazy newspaper sub-editors compose droll headlines; ROYALS ASCENT, ROYAL COMMAND PERFORMANCE etc. etc.
by Royal With Cheese » 09 Sep 2009 09:13
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Biscuit goalie, Bristol Paul, Clyde1998, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Horsham Royal, Hove Royal, Keysfield, Royal Ginger, Snowball, Sutekh, WestYorksRoyal and 271 guests