by Ian Royal » 16 Sep 2009 23:54
by floyd__streete » 16 Sep 2009 23:56
Para Handy Floyd. I like you a lot mate.. But I'm getting the feeling that you're not keeping the faith here.
by Maguire » 17 Sep 2009 00:38
The whole year inn Just HOW do players that have spent TEN YEARS playing for various levels of Chelsea's youth/reserve teams, with substantial loan periods also under their belt look so completely and utterly lacking in football knowledge?
It just doesn't make sense - he looks like a Golden Gamble winner that has won 90 minutes with the first team
by The Royal We » 17 Sep 2009 00:47
floyd__streetePara Handy Floyd. I like you a lot mate.. But I'm getting the feeling that you're not keeping the faith here.
Hello Para. I get this feeling with Rodgers that he might be the footballing Peter Mandelson; all rhetoric and soundbites, precious little to back it up.
by Thomas L'Heureux » 17 Sep 2009 00:50
MaguireThe whole year inn Just HOW do players that have spent TEN YEARS playing for various levels of Chelsea's youth/reserve teams, with substantial loan periods also under their belt look so completely and utterly lacking in football knowledge?
It just doesn't make sense - he looks like a Golden Gamble winner that has won 90 minutes with the first team
LOL and 'greed. It's bewildering how uncomfortable he looks with the ball at his feet when he's had such a prestigious footballing education.
I'm not writing him off, don't get me wrong, but my word there's a lot of work to do there.
by sandman » 17 Sep 2009 00:57
The Royal Wefloyd__streetePara Handy Floyd. I like you a lot mate.. But I'm getting the feeling that you're not keeping the faith here.
Hello Para. I get this feeling with Rodgers that he might be the footballing Peter Mandelson; all rhetoric and soundbites, precious little to back it up.
"all rhetoric and soundbites" - isn't that David Cameron.......?! Sorry, wrong board!
Either way, there's some David Brent in there too!
by Archie's penalty » 17 Sep 2009 00:58
floyd__streetePara Handy Floyd. I like you a lot mate.. But I'm getting the feeling that you're not keeping the faith here.
Hello Para. I get this feeling with Rodgers that he might be the footballing Peter Mandelson; all rhetoric and soundbites, precious little to back it up.
by Maguire » 17 Sep 2009 01:03
Thomas L'HeureuxMaguireThe whole year inn Just HOW do players that have spent TEN YEARS playing for various levels of Chelsea's youth/reserve teams, with substantial loan periods also under their belt look so completely and utterly lacking in football knowledge?
It just doesn't make sense - he looks like a Golden Gamble winner that has won 90 minutes with the first team
LOL and 'greed. It's bewildering how uncomfortable he looks with the ball at his feet when he's had such a prestigious footballing education.
I'm not writing him off, don't get me wrong, but my word there's a lot of work to do there.
Can either of you name a fairly successful Chelsea academy graduate, other than obviously John Terry and I guess Carlton Cole, from the last few years to back up this view?
Maybe you both hold their academy in a much higher regard than reality does...
by Big Foot » 17 Sep 2009 08:20
Ian Royal obviously less experienced than Rosenior and very raw, but give him another 3 or 4 games and you'll start to see why we binned LOLiam and got him in.
by Row Z Royal » 17 Sep 2009 08:22
Big FootIan Royal obviously less experienced than Rosenior and very raw, but give him another 3 or 4 games and you'll start to see why we binned LOLiam and got him in.
I can see why already - cheaper wages
I think the RB position is perhaps cursed for RFC? Rosenior & Cummings have both tried to fill the void left by Murty and both look like they'd be about suited to Sunday League
by Dirk Gently » 17 Sep 2009 08:24
Big Foot I think the RB position is perhaps cursed for RFC? Rosenior & Cummings have both tried to fill the void left by Murty and both look like they'd be about suited to Sunday League
by Big Foot » 17 Sep 2009 08:30
by holsgrove breaks a leg » 17 Sep 2009 08:43
floyd__streetePara Handy Floyd. I like you a lot mate.. But I'm getting the feeling that you're not keeping the faith here.
Hello Para. I get this feeling with Rodgers that he might be the footballing Peter Mandelson; all rhetoric and soundbites, precious little to back it up.
by holsgrove breaks a leg » 17 Sep 2009 08:44
Big FootIan Royal obviously less experienced than Rosenior and very raw, but give him another 3 or 4 games and you'll start to see why we binned LOLiam and got him in.
I can see why already - cheaper wages
I think the RB position is perhaps cursed for RFC? Rosenior & Cummings have both tried to fill the void left by Murty and both look like they'd be about suited to Sunday League
by Royal With Cheese » 17 Sep 2009 08:51
floyd__streete I get this feeling with Rodgers that he might be the footballing Peter Mandelson; all rhetoric and soundbites, precious little to back it up.
by loyalroyal4life » 17 Sep 2009 08:53
chilipepper91 There's a reason Chelsea let us have this guy permanently and Bertrand only on loan.
Bertrand can take on a man.
Bertrand can defend.
Bertrand can put a cross in the box.
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 17 Sep 2009 09:22
by Dawn » 17 Sep 2009 09:27
Dirk Gently I wonder if he's too worried about being caught out of position and leaving a big hole behind him.
by Ryn » 17 Sep 2009 09:35
by Thomas L'Heureux » 17 Sep 2009 09:40
Ryn We should rename him Short Comings, as he has lots of them.
Defensively he's ok, surely no worse than Rosenior. Same concerns about lack of competition for the position now.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 374 guests