by Stranded » 23 Jul 2025 08:40
by WestYorksRoyal » 23 Jul 2025 08:45
by Crusader Royal » 23 Jul 2025 09:34
But as Gus has asserted we’ve actually swapped him for a bit of the sell on for Bindon so no cash involved. Unless Gus is not to be trusted.From Despair To Where? wrote:Don't all our signings still have to go through additional scrutiny from the EFL? As this one is the only one with a transfer fee involved, I'd imagine any scrutiny would be doubly so.Brogue wrote:Yep he has been training with the team and has been for a couple of weeks now. We’re really not sure what the hold up is.Felt91 wrote:
If it’s been done for so long then what’s the hold up on the announcement? Has he been training with the team?
None of our signings have been particularly quick so far.
by From Despair To Where? » 23 Jul 2025 09:43
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Jul 2025 11:43
Gus couldn't find his own arse with a map and both hands. All he's interested in is lame jokes and post farming.Crusader Royal wrote:But as Gus has asserted we’ve actually swapped him for a bit of the sell on for Bindon so no cash involved. Unless Gus is not to be trusted.From Despair To Where? wrote:Don't all our signings still have to go through additional scrutiny from the EFL? As this one is the only one with a transfer fee involved, I'd imagine any scrutiny would be doubly so.Brogue wrote:
Yep he has been training with the team and has been for a couple of weeks now. We’re really not sure what the hold up is.
None of our signings have been particularly quick so far.
by Gus the teenage cow » 23 Jul 2025 11:48
by morganb » 23 Jul 2025 12:03
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Jul 2025 12:18
I'm sick of it all tbh. I keep an eye out for potential names we might sign out of interest and otherwise don't trust anything except the official club announcement.morganb wrote:I know you're not supposed to but I do find the "ITKs" on Twitter quite amusing:
ITK 1: Bowler done. Signing to be announced later today
ITK 2: Bowler deal has collapsed, wanted more money
ITK 3: Bowler still in discussions with the club
Evidently one of them is going to be right - which one do you believe and who is going to be able to brag about being correct while the others never mention it ever again?
by Sutekh » 23 Jul 2025 12:29
Fits in with the club saying some arse asked for more money after hand-shaking on a deal. Good thing is that it appears the club has been bought by the American John Madejski as SJM would have also told the player and his entourage to do one after reneging in such away.Gus the teenage cow wrote:An insider whom I shall refer to going forward as "the man in the sand" has informed me he moved the goalposts late in the day and asked for an increase in salary, from what we thought we have previously agreed with the player (circa 450k per annum + bonuses) to (650k per annum + bonuses) as his agent claims he has strong interest from the championship and is confident of getting that kind of money.
Brogue, can you check with your source to corroboarate this please?
by Brogue » 23 Jul 2025 12:35
by MartinRdg » 23 Jul 2025 12:45
Agree - quite happy with this approach. We don't want these type of players at the club. Happy to live within our means and lose signings if they want too much.Sutekh wrote:Fits in with the club saying some arse asked for more money after hand-shaking on a deal. Good thing is that it appears the club has been bought by the American John Madejski as SJM would have also told the player and his entourage to do one after reneging in such away.Gus the teenage cow wrote:An insider whom I shall refer to going forward as "the man in the sand" has informed me he moved the goalposts late in the day and asked for an increase in salary, from what we thought we have previously agreed with the player (circa 450k per annum + bonuses) to (650k per annum + bonuses) as his agent claims he has strong interest from the championship and is confident of getting that kind of money.
Brogue, can you check with your source to corroboarate this please?
It’s nice to be back where we started 35 years ago.
Let’s just consider this one a no ball.
by MartinRdg » 23 Jul 2025 12:46
I suppose the problem is that you said it was a done deal but now seems to have moved further away. Appreciate that this problem often happens with player deals.Brogue wrote:OK, if its winding people up i won't bother anymore. thought I'd been bang on the money with my posts, i'll keep it to myself going forward
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Jul 2025 12:47
by morganb » 23 Jul 2025 13:14
From my point of view I appreciate you sharing what you know on here and wouldn't want you to stop (if it helps, my post above was specific to Twitter ITKs who amuse not annoy me)Brogue wrote:OK, if its winding people up i won't bother anymore. thought I'd been bang on the money with my posts, i'll keep it to myself going forward
by WestYorksRoyal » 23 Jul 2025 13:21
He said it was done over the weekend and it hasn't been announced. If you want to be "ITK" you have to live with skepticism and criticism when you disclose information and nothing happens.morganb wrote:From my point of view I appreciate you sharing what you know on here and wouldn't want you to stop (if it helps, my post above was specific to Twitter ITKs who amuse not annoy me)Brogue wrote:OK, if its winding people up i won't bother anymore. thought I'd been bang on the money with my posts, i'll keep it to myself going forward
I think everyone understands that until the contract is signed anything can change and what you report is a snapshot in time
In Brogue we trust
by Stranded » 23 Jul 2025 13:44
Ah keep posting, keeps things entertaining - if deals happen great, if their made up, fine. It's in the internet, no-one should take it too seriously.Brogue wrote:OK, if its winding people up i won't bother anymore. thought I'd been bang on the money with my posts, i'll keep it to myself going forward
by blythspartan » 23 Jul 2025 13:58
100% keep up the rumours Brogue.Stranded wrote:Ah keep posting, keeps things entertaining - if deals happen great, if their made up, fine. It's in the internet, no-one should take it too seriously.Brogue wrote:OK, if its winding people up i won't bother anymore. thought I'd been bang on the money with my posts, i'll keep it to myself going forward
For example, someone on Twatter has just posted that they drove passed Bearwood and could see photos being taken of a young white man - could be Bowler, could be the Candian guy, could be (and likely is) completely bollocks but its entertaining enough if you don't take it seriously.
by Esteban » 23 Jul 2025 15:02
Yeah, definitely keep it going. Good to know who we're targeting, even if they don't work out.Brogue wrote:OK, if its winding people up i won't bother anymore. thought I'd been bang on the money with my posts, i'll keep it to myself going forward
by Crowbar6753 » 23 Jul 2025 15:12
by ILoveMoonPig » 23 Jul 2025 15:28
Nah, keep doing your thing! You're nearly always bang on the money. You're the only/most ITK person on here.Brogue wrote:OK, if its winding people up i won't bother anymore. thought I'd been bang on the money with my posts, i'll keep it to myself going forward
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 97 guests