Page 8 of 8

Re: RUMOUR - Bikey to Hull/Sunderland

Posted: 18 Aug 2008 16:55
by Streets
Dirk Gently wrote:
West Stand Man wrote:I am amazed that anyone thinks that a pairing of Ingimarsson/Sonko is better than Sonko/Bikey! Those 2 would be a potentially awesome barrier to any CCC strike force.
But a much less well-marshaled and well-organised defence. Ingimarsson's value isn't just in how he plays himself - it's also the effect he has on the others, and I don't think either Sonko or Bikey is yet experienced or mature/focused enough to play that roll well enough.
'greed. Duberry though could take that role if Ivar's form dropped.

Re: RUMOUR - Bikey to Hull/Sunderland

Posted: 05 Nov 2008 16:07
by AlexY25
His values surely risen since the beginnin of the year :D

Re: Bikey to Hull/Sunderland

Posted: 06 Nov 2008 00:02
by SLAMMED
Ideal wrote:This is sickening, why would we want to sell Bikey? He has potential and should be the basis of our rebuilt team, why on earth would we want to sell him?
We should rather sell Sonko and Bennett!
its a rumour... i wouldnt get worried untill its official...

Re: Bikey to Hull/Sunderland

Posted: 06 Nov 2008 09:12
by Ozymandias
SLAMMED wrote:
Ideal wrote:This is sickening, why would we want to sell Bikey? He has potential and should be the basis of our rebuilt team, why on earth would we want to sell him?
We should rather sell Sonko and Bennett!
its a rumour... i wouldnt get worried untill its official...
Listen, oh Young SLAMMED, this is the topic of over-reaction and panic. Stories need to be no more than a hack's bored column filling for this topic to go into meltdown.

Re: Bikey to Hull/Sunderland

Posted: 06 Nov 2008 12:21
by Morph
SLAMMED wrote:
Ideal wrote:This is sickening, why would we want to sell Bikey? He has potential and should be the basis of our rebuilt team, why on earth would we want to sell him?
We should rather sell Sonko and Bennett!
its a rumour... i wouldnt get worried untill its official...
Pearce is the future.