Hob Nob Anyone?

Royalee wrote:He'd suit Rodgers' preferred 4-5-1 system.

So would a lot of players - don't mean to say they'll be any good

Tyson is a decent lower league striker - that is all.

I'll be happy to be proved wrong though!!

Matt de K wrote:

LoyalRoyalFan wrote:How is this 'NO LONGER A RUMOUR'?
He hasn't even signed yet.

PLUS it's a rumour by the Sun NOT the BBC you spunkweasel.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A54024491

Reading are set to launch a £1m bid for Nottingham Forest striker Nathan Tyson.


Who'se the spunkweasle now? It always amazes me how many oxf*rd can not work out that there may just be the same rumours in more than one place.

Sir Rodney Effing wrote:

Matt de K wrote:

LoyalRoyalFan wrote:How is this 'NO LONGER A RUMOUR'?
He hasn't even signed yet.

PLUS it's a rumour by the Sun NOT the BBC you spunkweasel.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A54024491

Reading are set to launch a £1m bid for Nottingham Forest striker Nathan Tyson.


Who'se the spunkweasle now? It always amazes me how many oxf*rd can not work out that there may just be the same rumours in more than one place.

You cock muffin.

taken from that "BBC" link;

"Tyson
Championship Nottingham Forest
>>>>>>>>>by NFFC_4_LYF<<<<<<<<< (U12700782) 04 July 2009

Reading are set to launch a £1m bid for Nottingham Forest striker Nathan Tyson.

I hope we reject it to be honest as hes a great asset to the team."

So NFFC_4_LYF works for the BBC does he?? The Sun is the only people to have reported this.

This is reported in the BBC rumours page: (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 134154.stm)
"Reading are set to launch a £1m bid for Nottingham Forest striker Nathan Tyson. (The Sun)"

So quite obviously you join Kiwi in the spunkweasel dept.

I live in the Nottingham area and have some mates that are forest fans, they dont rate him at all! i would be disgusted if this is true. Hes average at best

The point is, even if the BBC site report was from an official reporter it would still be a rumour. Until he's actually signed (anywhere) it's a rumour and so should be in UR&G.

Matt de K wrote:

Sir Rodney Effing wrote:

Matt de K wrote: PLUS it's a rumour by the Sun NOT the BBC you spunkweasel.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A54024491

Reading are set to launch a £1m bid for Nottingham Forest striker Nathan Tyson.


Who'se the spunkweasle now? It always amazes me how many oxf*rd can not work out that there may just be the same rumours in more than one place.

You cock muffin.

taken from that "BBC" link;

"Tyson
Championship Nottingham Forest
>>>>>>>>>by NFFC_4_LYF<<<<<<<<< (U12700782) 04 July 2009

Reading are set to launch a £1m bid for Nottingham Forest striker Nathan Tyson.

I hope we reject it to be honest as hes a great asset to the team.

So NFFC_4_LYF works for the BBC does he?? The Sun is the only people to have reported this.

This is reported in the BBC rumours page: (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 134154.stm)
"Reading are set to launch a £1m bid for Nottingham Forest striker Nathan Tyson. (The Sun)"

So quite obviously you join Kiwi in the spunkweasel dept.

Not really - they're different BBC websites my old spunkchina

Christ, if people on here believe everything they read on the BBC then the board is a thicker place that I'd thought.

It's a fecking rumour, and let's all hope it's not true.

No thanks.
Smith, Priskin, Cox, etc. I'd be happy with.
Tyson? No.

Spunkweasle and cock muffin are good though

LoyalRoyal22 wrote:I live in the Nottingham area and have some mates that are forest fans, they dont rate him at all! i would be disgusted if this is true. Hes average at best

Average at best is a little unfair. I'm not sure I'd like to see us spend £1m on him. There's better players out there for that money.

Handsome Man wrote:Spunkweasle and cock muffin are good though

how much are we bidding for them?

Everyone seems a tad upset about this being on The Team, I agree it should be on UR&G.

Nobody seems that upset about it to actually press the "report to moderators" icon though.

Thread reported.

Sir Rodney Effing wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A54024491

Reading are set to launch a £1m bid for Nottingham Forest striker Nathan Tyson.

Sir Rodney Effing wrote: Not really - they're different BBC websites my old spunkchina

What the hell are you going on about?? You are the one that posted the "link" to someone's 606 blog, not me. I was merely stating that the BBC have reported jack shit about this, only what the Sun had rumoured. Now go wipe that shit lipstick off your lips and clean your teeth you dirty manboy

LoyalRoyal22 wrote:I live in the Nottingham area and have some mates that are forest fans, they dont rate him at all! i would be disgusted if this is true. Hes average at best

They're on their own then!!!

Every Forest fan i've spoken to rate him and its only his injuries that have hit his form of late, they all know what he is capable of.

I grew up with Nathan and still chat on the occasion and he'd love to come back to Reading, its where his family is, where his friends are etc - i reckon if we signed him, we'd see a different Tyson to the one thats hit or miss at Forest (due to injury)

Merked

I will go out on a limb and say that I would not be happy with resigning NT. I can not see what he can bring to the party. IMHO, it would be a backward step.

Not going anywhere according to Billy Davies

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 66,00.html

Handsome Man wrote:Spunkweasle and cock muffin are good though

Roasted and toasted. Mmmm...