Page 1 of 3
Juicy gossip....
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:04
by Dirk Gently
The juiciest bit of gossip I've heard so far this year.
I know there has been speculation about "reasons" for Halford's lack of performances and his sudden departure.
A contact at Sunderland has just suggested to me that the reason behind Roy Keane's fury in the manager's office after the match last month wasn't the last minute goal.
It was a lot more to do with us having sold him a player with a "problem" and not having mentioned that "problem".....
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:05
by Alan Partridge
MurkderLOLand
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:08
by Coppelled Streets
Then LOL @ Keane!
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:08
by West Stand Flash
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:11
by SpaceCruiser
Did Colchester tell us about his problem when they sold him to us?
I doubt it, so I don't see why Keane should be angry at us for not telling him. It's his problem, not ours.
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:12
by papereyes
Unless he didn't have the problem or as big a problem on his salary at Colchester.
That said, Spacey's right. Its up to Keane to scout that.
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:19
by Dirk Gently
Depends if he asked us or not.
Under Law, if I sold you a car that I knew had dodgy brakes that's fine - as long as you don't ask "Are the brakes ok?" Buyer beware and all that.....
But if you do ask and I say "They're fine" then you have legal redress...
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:19
by Dirk Gently
West Stand Flash wrote:http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=67838&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=100
This is gossip and not appropriate for "The Team"
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:21
by papereyes
Dirk Gently wrote:Depends if he asked us or not.
Under Law, if I sold you a car that I knew had dodgy brakes that's fine - as long as you don't ask "Are the brakes ok?" Buyer beware and all that.....
But if you do ask and I say "They're fine" then you have legal redress...
I can't see that applying to footballers though ...
Injuries - club pays for a medical
Psychological issues - well, the club should pay for a basic evaluation and research any issues.
IMO
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:31
by bobby m's syrup
Dirk Gently wrote:Depends if he asked us or not.
Under Law, if I sold you a car that I knew had dodgy brakes that's fine - as long as you don't ask "Are the brakes ok?" Buyer beware and all that.....
But if you do ask and I say "They're fine" then you have legal redress...
Depends on whether or not you are a trader. As a private individual, you are probably correct, but as a trader, it is against the law to sell an unroadworthy vehicle
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:35
by Uke
Sunderland would have done a drug screen as part of his routine medical
If it was negative he was clean therefore no problem.
If they didn't do it then it was "their bad"

as it should be part of the due diligence process.
Who's to say that Roy Keane didn't drive him to seek solace in drugs with his skills as a manager?
Not a leg to stand on...
Re: Juicy gossip....
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:37
by TFF
Dirk Gently wrote:The juiciest bit of gossip I've heard so far this year.
I know there has been speculation about "reasons" for Halford's lack of performances and his sudden departure.
A contact at Sunderland has just suggested to me that the reason behind Roy Keane's fury in the manager's office after the match last month wasn't the last minute goal.
It was a lot more to do with us having sold him a player with a "problem" and not having mentioned that "problem".....
ALOL.
Brightened my morning. Cheers DG
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:39
by Coppelled Streets
I trust he had a medical at that huge football club, so tough, you didn't pick up on it so more fool you.
Re: Juicy gossip....
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:40
by Uke
Dirk Gently wrote:The juiciest bit of gossip I've heard so far this year.
I know there has been speculation about "reasons" for Halford's lack of performances and his sudden departure.
A contact at Sunderland has just suggested to me that the reason behind Roy Keane's fury in the manager's office after the match last month wasn't the last minute goal.
It was a lot more to do with us having sold him a player with a "problem" and not having mentioned that "problem".....
How nice of the God that is Phil Parkinson to have done the same to us then?
Still want him as a manager?

Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:42
by andrew1957
I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:44
by ElmParker
andrew1957 wrote:I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
Depends on the substance. Certain popular recreational drugs clear the system very quickly.
A player would only need to lay off if for a few days before the medical.
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:47
by papereyes
ElmParker wrote:andrew1957 wrote:I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
Depends on the substance. Certain popular recreational drugs clear the system very quickly.
A player would only need to lay off if for a few days before the medical.
Coke is between a day and 3 days, depending on weight and metabolism.
I remember being told hash takes a lot longer - fat soluble byproducts, I guess.
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:50
by Uke
ElmParker wrote:andrew1957 wrote:I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
Depends on the substance. Certain popular recreational drugs clear the system very quickly.
A player would only need to lay off if for a few days before the medical.
Here's the list:
http://www.craigmedical.com/drug_test_f ... fter%20use
He probably did a Britney and shaved his hair too

Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:50
by Fezza
papereyes wrote:ElmParker wrote:andrew1957 wrote:I would have thought football clubs would do checks as part of the medical - a routing blood test would show up any issues.
Depends on the substance. Certain popular recreational drugs clear the system very quickly.
A player would only need to lay off if for a few days before the medical.
Coke is between a day and 3 days, depending on weight and metabolism.
I remember being told
hash takes a lot longer - fat soluble byproducts, I guess.
Something like 5 months isn't it?
Posted: 10 Jan 2008 11:51
by Old Biscuitman
Whatever, he's a fool and we're well rid of. Keane should be mad with himself, not our side.