Page 1 of 1
SPECULATION - Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:16
by 1871royals
I think he would be a great signing. Rejected a contract at the “biggest club in the division.” Pace, young and can play on either flank; also whenever I have seen him play seems a goal threat. Rejected a contract so can be snapped up for a nominal fee, get in there Sir Steve.
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:17
by Thaumagurist*
.
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:31
by Vision
He'd be a genuine steal.
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:34
by Agent Balti
Vision wrote:He'd be a genuine steal.
I saw what you did there!
Can we still play him on day release from the clink?
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:40
by Roger the Rabbit
He's under 24 so it wouldn't be a nominal fee, it would be a tribunal fee which is always a bit of a gamble.
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:42
by brendywendy
Roger the Rabbit wrote:He's under 24 so it wouldn't be a nominal fee, it would be a tribunal fee which is always a bit of a gamble.
pretty sure the tribunal fees are always lower than the selling club wants though
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:55
by Bill Oddie's Beard
He is a decent player with bags of pace. Not sure Coppell would want to take a gamble on him given his recent shenanigans though.
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:57
by Thaumagurist*
.
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 12:39
by Row Z Royal
Leroy hasn't been in trouble recently so we could do with a controversial figure at the club.
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 12:45
by Bill Oddie's Beard
Thaumagurist* wrote:Bill Oddie's Beard wrote:He is a decent player with bags of pace. Not sure Coppell would want to take a gamble on him given he's recent shenanigans though.
His.
HTH.
Just keeping you on your toes...
Re: Nathan Dyer
Posted: 01 Jul 2008 13:09
by Roger the Rabbit
brendywendy wrote:Roger the Rabbit wrote:He's under 24 so it wouldn't be a nominal fee, it would be a tribunal fee which is always a bit of a gamble.
pretty sure the tribunal fees are always lower than the selling club wants though
Isn;t that like pay rises are always less than you think you deserve ?
I reckon the fees are always skewed in favour of the larger club, so if we went for Dyer Saints would have us over a barrel.
Re: SPECULATION - Nathan Dyer
Posted: 14 May 2009 10:34
by The whole year inn
Swansea are taking the piss with a 200k offer
Southampton look like they have no option but to sell, what with debts approaching 30 odd million
Seriously, come on
Re: SPECULATION - Nathan Dyer
Posted: 14 May 2009 10:54
by Deathy
SteaLOL.
I hope the 'appy rabbit is on it. Tricky little player too.
Re: SPECULATION - Nathan Dyer
Posted: 14 May 2009 14:29
by specialjon
Without a manager in place it's hard to sign anyone but he's a class act. Come Hammond appoint a new manager and sign this boy.
Re: SPECULATION - Nathan Dyer
Posted: 16 May 2009 13:09
by JYOUNG1300
at the swansea game he tore us apart sign him up!
Re: SPECULATION - Nathan Dyer
Posted: 16 May 2009 21:17
by blade 1
He was really good for us.
we had him on loan for 3 months, but only played him for the last 4 weeks of that spell. And he decided he would rarthr go to swansea instead of coming back. Which is fair enough.
A decent signing for a team that wants to be challanging at the top i'd say.