Page 1 of 2
SPECULATION - Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 08:05
by Scarface
Rumoured to be going to QPR for £2m. We should offload Harper for £5m and then get Johnson in for £2m, great business and a much better player.
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 08:08
by Deathy
It's unlikely anyone would pay £5m for Harper.
Poor little Stephen Hunt thinks he's worth £5m and no one else agrees.
Johnson would be an almighty signing, credit to QPR if they get him.
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 08:15
by Chuckle Brother
Excellent player on his day but when someone as young as him struggles so much with (different) injuries it is a cause for concern.
Think it will take more than £2 million despite this anyway.
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 08:19
by chilipepper91
Yes please
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 08:22
by Stranded
QPR will more than likely be paying astronomical wages to him if he does go - I'd also expect a prem club to come in unless they all think he's too big of a risk injury wise.
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 08:40
by readingbedding
We don't need him.
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 08:45
by gazzer, loyal royal
fantastic prospect but barely played because of injuries, so its a no from me until he proves otherwise
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 09:20
by Focher
very very good player but my Man city season ticket holder mate said he his horrifically injury prone
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 11:31
by Maguire
Super player, better than anything we've got at Reading, but it's no good if you can't even walk.
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 11:48
by Norfolk Royal
Never held Darren Caskey back.
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 12:31
by Deathy
Norfolk Royal wrote:Never held Darren Caskey back.
Waddling didn't do him any harm.
Re: SPECULATION - Michael Johnson
Posted: 29 Jan 2009 14:44
by maf82
we would never buy a player for 2 million,no point bringing it up
Re: SPECULATION - Michael Johnson
Posted: 30 Jan 2009 11:21
by Hoop Blah
If Harpers off I'd love to see us make a move here.
Can't see it happening though as I'm sure someone else will put in a better offer.
Re: SPECULATION - Michael Johnson
Posted: 30 Jan 2009 14:16
by skipper
maf82 wrote:we would never buy a player for 2 million,no point bringing it up
What did Fae cost us?
Re: SPECULATION - Michael Johnson
Posted: 30 Jan 2009 15:01
by gazzer, loyal royal
skipper wrote:maf82 wrote:we would never buy a player for 2 million,no point bringing it up
What did Fae cost us?
and Halford?
Re: SPECULATION - Michael Johnson
Posted: 30 Jan 2009 16:09
by rg6royal
Yeah why not
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 30 Jan 2009 16:39
by RobRoyal
readingbedding wrote:We don't need him.
Insane.
Re: SPECULATION - Michael Johnson
Posted: 30 Jan 2009 19:57
by Southbank Old Boy
Man City seem keen to get rid of some excellent young players for a fraction of their worth in todays market
If anyone can snap up this kid, and he's not physcially ruined, then they've got themselves a bargin and a hell of a player
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 30 Jan 2009 21:01
by FiNeRaIn
Deathy wrote:
Poor little Stephen Hunt thinks he's worth £5m and no one else agrees.
Really? where did he say that then?
Re: Michael Johnson
Posted: 30 Jan 2009 21:41
by Ian Royal
FiNeRaIn wrote:Deathy wrote:
Poor little Stephen Hunt thinks he's worth £5m and no one else agrees.
Really? where did he say that then?
I imagine Jay has extrapolated from Hunt's contract clause that he and the club rate him at £5m, but as no one is willing to cough up, the rest of the world doesn't.