Page 1 of 2

RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 09:16
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY
According to The Sun (yes i know take with a pinch of salt!) - we have offered a coaching position to the recently sacked Southampton manager -

Re: Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 09:35
by winchester_royal
Wouldn't suprise me. Coppell was very complimentary about him before the Saints game.

Re: Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 09:41
by The 17 Bus
And he made a special effort to shake his hand after both games this season.

Actually could make a lot of sense, knows the European game, will have good contacts, and probably speaks dutch.

Re: Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 09:46
by trueroyal1871
Excellent coach, didn't quite work out for him as a manager but his coaching skills would be a good addition to the club.

Re: Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 09:52
by Southbank Old Boy
The 17 Bus wrote:and probably speaks dutch.
I reckon thats pretty likely yea!!!

Not sure we really need another coach but if bringing him in meant we would start to teach our lot how to pass the ball a bit more like Southampton did then it could only be a good thing

Re: Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 10:01
by Stranded
He's been a coach at the club before, I believe left shortly before taking the Soton job - so wouldn't at be surprising if he came back as he's highly rated here.

Re: Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 10:15
by glass half full
Stranded wrote:He's been a coach at the club before, I believe left shortly before taking the Soton job - so wouldn't at be surprising if he came back as he's highly rated here.
Another example of the weird thinking by Southampton board to sack him. He would be a huge asset on the coaching team, even if only for the short term.

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 11:07
by Platypuss
If he can get us playing all the time like Saints managed for one game at The Madstad against us I'd be all for it!

Re: Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 11:32
by Agent Balti
glass half full wrote:
Stranded wrote:He's been a coach at the club before, I believe left shortly before taking the Soton job - so wouldn't at be surprising if he came back as he's highly rated here.
Another example of the weird thinking by Southampton board to sack him. He would be a huge asset on the coaching team, even if only for the short term.
Just because you're a good coach, doesn't mean you're a good manager. *cough* Tony Adams *cough*

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 14:35
by glass half full
I still see itchy fingers on the trigger from the Saints board. They need to take a hard look at themselves.

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 21:21
by Victor Meldrew
This topic was mentioned on South Today last night.
If Downes is the defensive coach and Dillon is.....Dillon then he could be the offensive coach.
This is association football not American football at our club,is it?

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 21:34
by Arch
Victor Meldrew wrote:This topic was mentioned on South Today last night.
If Downes is the defensive coach and Dillon is.....Dillon then he could be the offensive coach.
This is association football not American football at our club,is it?
Maybe he'll be the Offensive Coordinator. Will he call the plays or will Coppell?

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 31 Jan 2009 22:12
by OLLIE KEARNS
Arch wrote:
Victor Meldrew wrote:This topic was mentioned on South Today last night.
If Downes is the defensive coach and Dillon is.....Dillon then he could be the offensive coach.
This is association football not American football at our club,is it?
Maybe he'll be the Offensive Coordinator. Will he call the plays or will Coppell?
He could be our 4-5-1 coach. Teach us how to play it and how to play against it. Because much as I support our current coaching staff they're struggling a bit with this one I have to say !

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 01 Feb 2009 10:02
by starbug
hope its true and he can teach the team to play football at last

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 01 Feb 2009 12:21
by Deathy
starbug wrote:hope its true and he can teach the team to play football at last
Agreed. Second in the table with 16 games to go is just not good enough!

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 01 Feb 2009 13:17
by West Stand Man
Can we just confirm that this is Jan Poortvliet that we are talking about, not some new dutchman from Southampton with a similar name?

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 01 Feb 2009 22:14
by Ian Royal
Just to controvertially throw something out there:

Brought in to get used to the squad and gradually build in a new way of playing for the Premiership, when he takes over as manager from Coppell at the end of the season?

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 01 Feb 2009 22:27
by Deathy
Ian Royal wrote:Just to controvertially throw something out there:

Brought in to get used to the squad and gradually build in a new way of playing for the Premiership, when he takes over as manager from Coppell at the end of the season?
Was my thought. I agree with RL in that up or not this season, Coppell has done his bit here and will depart. If that is the case, Madejski knows about that well in advance and will be looking at replacements nice and early, or you would hope so.

Not sure what JP taking the reins would do for me. But as long as it isn't Dillon or Wally...

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 02 Feb 2009 08:39
by West Stand Man
Ian Royal wrote:Just to controvertially throw something out there:

Brought in to get used to the squad and gradually build in a new way of playing for the Premiership, when he takes over as manager from Coppell at the end of the season?
I'd hardly think that was a controversy. Maybe sensible planning, but not a controversy.

Re: RUMOUR - Jan Poortvelet

Posted: 02 Feb 2009 17:52
by Ian Royal
West Stand Man wrote:
Ian Royal wrote:Just to controvertially throw something out there:

Brought in to get used to the squad and gradually build in a new way of playing for the Premiership, when he takes over as manager from Coppell at the end of the season?
I'd hardly think that was a controversy. Maybe sensible planning, but not a controversy.
A significant portion of HNA would dispute the sky was blue and grass is green if I suggested it was the case. That makes anything I say potentially controversial.