by Maguire » 29 Sep 2009 11:06
by CMRoyal » 29 Sep 2009 11:07
by Glen Little's Nose » 29 Sep 2009 11:14
by ZacNaloen » 29 Sep 2009 11:15
by Ryn » 29 Sep 2009 11:17
by Focher » 29 Sep 2009 11:18
by Glen Little's Nose » 29 Sep 2009 11:23
CMRoyal Back to the Chelsea-style Super 23. Two for each position +1 extra keeper leads to a squad something akin to:-
3xgks
Cummings
Kelly
Bertrand
Armstrong
Pearce or Cisse
Mills
Ingi
O'Dea
Karacan
Gunnarsson
Howard
Matejovsky or Davies
Sigurdsson
Kebe
McAnuff
Robson-Kanu (or Matejovsky or Davies)
Rasiak
Church
Long
Hunt
by Alan Partridge » 29 Sep 2009 11:35
ZacNaloen Long is injured AP and has been since the international break, "no room" isn't quite what I would call accurate there considering he was on the bench for every match up to then iirc.
by SWLR » 29 Sep 2009 11:40
Focher Personally i think this is the most positive thing to happen since Rodgers took over (assuming he rids of the obvious candidates).
This gives us every chance of a settled squad and consistency, which was one of the main reasons why we were so good for 2 seasons in 2005-2007. Only time will tell if the players that remain will be good enough, and lets face it did we all think Coppells squad was good enough after the Plymouth game of 2005/2006? No.
Rodgers needs time, and we need patience.
by Dorset-Knob » 29 Sep 2009 11:54
Alan Partridge I think he's right. I mentioned on another thread, we've got a big squad of players of similar ability/styles. Which is a nightmare if the team isn't winning,
by ZacNaloen » 29 Sep 2009 11:56
by 79Royal » 29 Sep 2009 12:04
Dorset-KnobAlan Partridge I think he's right. I mentioned on another thread, we've got a big squad of players of similar ability/styles. Which is a nightmare if the team isn't winning,
The bit that concerns me is exactly this, what will be the real gain from offloading duplicates of under performing players?
by skipper » 29 Sep 2009 12:10
by ZacNaloen » 29 Sep 2009 12:11
by brendywendy » 29 Sep 2009 12:11
winchester_royal This was always likely to be the case after around 10 games.
It would have been impossible for BR to know who his best players were without seeing them in competitve situations under his new tactics, and once we now start to get some consistency we might start shooting up the table.
by Zammo » 29 Sep 2009 12:12
by Royalee » 29 Sep 2009 12:14
brendywendywinchester_royal This was always likely to be the case after around 10 games.
It would have been impossible for BR to know who his best players were without seeing them in competitve situations under his new tactics, and once we now start to get some consistency we might start shooting up the table.
totally agree
and fits in with the timescale of the extended preseason etc
i also believe its a geat thing (after the eprceived lack of opportunity for some of the kids under coppell) that he gave everyone their chance to perform for him, and hopefully the ones who now go out on loan cant have any argument with it, and will work twice as hard to get back here.
people forget with the inconsistancy of this league that it is possible to be bottom three at xmas, an top half by may
and if we manage anywhere near tthat after testing our whole squad, & rebuilding it in brendans image, i believe weve got our selves a top manager for this club
- henrys already out on laon at millwall- deservedly so, not looked up to this level so far IMO, and maybe with the pressure off a league down he can get his head straighy
by brendywendy » 29 Sep 2009 12:15
by brendywendy » 29 Sep 2009 12:16
Royaleebrendywendywinchester_royal This was always likely to be the case after around 10 games.
It would have been impossible for BR to know who his best players were without seeing them in competitve situations under his new tactics, and once we now start to get some consistency we might start shooting up the table.
totally agree
and fits in with the timescale of the extended preseason etc
i also believe its a geat thing (after the eprceived lack of opportunity for some of the kids under coppell) that he gave everyone their chance to perform for him, and hopefully the ones who now go out on loan cant have any argument with it, and will work twice as hard to get back here.
people forget with the inconsistancy of this league that it is possible to be bottom three at xmas, an top half by may
and if we manage anywhere near tthat after testing our whole squad, & rebuilding it in brendans image, i believe weve got our selves a top manager for this club
- henrys already out on laon at millwall- deservedly so, not looked up to this level so far IMO, and maybe with the pressure off a league down he can get his head straighy
We very rarely agree, but spot on.
by Royalee » 29 Sep 2009 12:21
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Four Of Clubs and 138 guests