Thames Sports Investment

5145 posts
postwhisperer
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: 16 Jun 2011 21:52

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by postwhisperer » 14 Apr 2012 17:39

chilipepper91
Royal Rother To Stuka- Of course, but it probably wouldn't have happened without the signing of Roberts which was funded by TSI's money.


And it also helped keep Kebe and Federici here.

we dont need mercenaries

FVCK TSI

we ain't chelsea
WE READING

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by sandman » 14 Apr 2012 17:44

postwhisperer
chilipepper91
Royal Rother To Stuka- Of course, but it probably wouldn't have happened without the signing of Roberts which was funded by TSI's money.


And it also helped keep Kebe and Federici here.

we dont need mercenaries

FVCK TSI

we ain't chelsea
WE READING


Way too obvious.
Last edited by sandman on 14 Apr 2012 17:44, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Friday's Legacy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3172
Joined: 31 May 2011 17:46
Location: http://oddschanger.com/

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Friday's Legacy » 14 Apr 2012 17:44

postwhisperer
chilipepper91
Royal Rother To Stuka- Of course, but it probably wouldn't have happened without the signing of Roberts which was funded by TSI's money.


And it also helped keep Kebe and Federici here.

we dont need mercenaries

FVCK TSI

we ain't chelsea
WE READING


Without their investment we will make an abrupt return to the Championship and then face further annual black holes and restructuring. Basically back where we were before TSI came along and ultimately edging towards the trapdoor to League 1.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21360
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Royal Rother » 14 Apr 2012 17:46

postwhisperer
chilipepper91
Royal Rother To Stuka- Of course, but it probably wouldn't have happened without the signing of Roberts which was funded by TSI's money.


And it also helped keep Kebe and Federici here.

we dont need mercenaries

FVCK TSI

we ain't chelsea
WE READING

Is this bloke pissed or demented?

User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Simon's Church » 14 Apr 2012 17:48

Friday's Legacy
postwhisperer
chilipepper91
And it also helped keep Kebe and Federici here.

we dont need mercenaries

FVCK TSI

we ain't chelsea
WE READING


Without their investment we will make an abrupt return to the Championship and then face further annual black holes and restructuring. Basically back where we were before TSI came along and ultimately edging towards the trapdoor to League 1.


:lol: :lol:


User avatar
robinsfriday
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: 22 Sep 2004 00:39

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by robinsfriday » 14 Apr 2012 17:49

Every time this thread gets bumped up I'm half expecting news...

postwhisperer
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: 16 Jun 2011 21:52

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by postwhisperer » 14 Apr 2012 17:51

keep it real prejudice has no place in the world

User avatar
Friday's Legacy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3172
Joined: 31 May 2011 17:46
Location: http://oddschanger.com/

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Friday's Legacy » 14 Apr 2012 17:54

You disagree, Churchy? Without TSI we would have lost McDermott, and that's a fact. There would have been no Jason Roberts, Federici or Kebe in January. The summer would have meant more summer sales to balance the books. When you can't afford to replace quality with quality you ultimately become one of the weaker teams in the league. Just my opinion, but don't let the good times we're enjoying (because of TSI's investment) cloud your opinion of where we were as a club financially without their investment.

User avatar
No Hoops
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1098
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:42

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by No Hoops » 14 Apr 2012 18:31

Stuka Does the value of Reading FC increase as promotion looks more and more likely?


Yes.


User avatar
Stuka
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3480
Joined: 15 Nov 2006 17:09
Location: North London

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Stuka » 14 Apr 2012 18:49

No Hoops
Stuka Does the value of Reading FC increase as promotion looks more and more likely?


Yes.


Already answered and explained mate.
Last edited by Stuka on 14 Apr 2012 19:34, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Far Canal
Member
Posts: 697
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 00:31
Location: Kennetside

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Far Canal » 14 Apr 2012 18:51

postwhisperer keep it real prejudice has no place in the world


or punctuation, apparently.

User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Simon's Church » 14 Apr 2012 18:54

Friday's Legacy You disagree, Churchy? Without TSI we would have lost McDermott, and that's a fact. There would have been no Jason Roberts, Federici or Kebe in January. The summer would have meant more summer sales to balance the books. When you can't afford to replace quality with quality you ultimately become one of the weaker teams in the league. Just my opinion, but don't let the good times we're enjoying (because of TSI's investment) cloud your opinion of where we were as a club financially without their investment.


Losing McDermott isn't really a fact though is it? Why would there have been no Federici? I don't remember us getting any bids for him, the club also said we wouldn't sell Kebe in January.

When we first heard of TSI we were 8th and had just won 7 in 9, doesn't sound like we were slipping towards relegation to me.

User avatar
Friday's Legacy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3172
Joined: 31 May 2011 17:46
Location: http://oddschanger.com/

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Friday's Legacy » 14 Apr 2012 19:04

Simon's Church
Friday's Legacy You disagree, Churchy? Without TSI we would have lost McDermott, and that's a fact. There would have been no Jason Roberts, Federici or Kebe in January. The summer would have meant more summer sales to balance the books. When you can't afford to replace quality with quality you ultimately become one of the weaker teams in the league. Just my opinion, but don't let the good times we're enjoying (because of TSI's investment) cloud your opinion of where we were as a club financially without their investment.


Losing McDermott isn't really a fact though is it? Why would there have been no Federici? I don't remember us getting any bids for him, the club also said we wouldn't sell Kebe in January.

When we first heard of TSI we were 8th and had just won 7 in 9, doesn't sound like we were slipping towards relegation to me.


Had there been no TSI then McDermott would have gone to Wolves.

Also, Federici asked to leave in January and we were considering letting Kebe go with one firm bid on the table, rather than lose him in the summer for free.

TSI made the difference. You seem to think we'll be fine without their investment. I merely highlight that without them we wouldn't be where we are right now, and this summer would be more of the same with regards to other big names leaving to balance the books, only this time without McDermott to rebuild his 3rd team.


User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7143
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Royal Ginger » 14 Apr 2012 19:09

Generally quite happy with the idea of TSI, and everyone at the club is saying all of the right things, i only really have 2 concerns which can perhaps be put to rest by someone more knowledgeable on here.

1. What sort of return is TSI looking for on their investment, and over what period?

2. And just how involved is Anton going to get in the everyday. E.g will we see his cousin turn up with his boots.

User avatar
Mike Hunt
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2812
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 08:24
Location: Blue and White

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Mike Hunt » 14 Apr 2012 19:26

Friday's Legacy
postwhisperer
chilipepper91
And it also helped keep Kebe and Federici here.

we dont need mercenaries

FVCK TSI

we ain't chelsea
WE READING


Without their investment we will make an abrupt return to the Championship and then face further annual black holes and restructuring. Basically back where we were before TSI came along and ultimately edging towards the trapdoor to League 1.


Come on FL! PW was on the wind up! He has been trying for a few days, and now caught a biggie

User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Simon's Church » 14 Apr 2012 19:28

Friday's Legacy
Had there been no TSI then McDermott would have gone to Wolves.
Maybe, maybe not.

Also, Federici asked to leave in January and we were considering letting Kebe go with one firm bid on the table, rather than lose him in the summer for free.
News to me.

TSI made the difference. You seem to think we'll be fine without their investment. I merely highlight that without them we wouldn't be where we are right now, and this summer would be more of the same with regards to other big names leaving to balance the books, only this time without McDermott to rebuild his 3rd team.
We wouldn't be where we are now and we may not have even made the play-offs but I still think that to suggest 'no TSI = relegation within a few years' is a massive leap of logic. Don't forget that even with our crappy pre-Roberts team we had already beaten West Ham, Birmingham and almost Southampton.

User avatar
Pseud O'Nym
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1712
Joined: 24 Jan 2008 01:06
Location: An elephant is not a large bacterium.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Pseud O'Nym » 14 Apr 2012 21:08

Royal Lady Do we yet know WHO the consortium consists of? Or will we never know.....


Why do you think it's been set up as an offshore nominees stylee thing? Of course we'll never know.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11704
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by RoyalBlue » 15 Apr 2012 07:58

Simon's Church
Friday's Legacy
Had there been no TSI then McDermott would have gone to Wolves.
Maybe, maybe not.

Also, Federici asked to leave in January and we were considering letting Kebe go with one firm bid on the table, rather than lose him in the summer for free.
News to me.

TSI made the difference. You seem to think we'll be fine without their investment. I merely highlight that without them we wouldn't be where we are right now, and this summer would be more of the same with regards to other big names leaving to balance the books, only this time without McDermott to rebuild his 3rd team.
We wouldn't be where we are now and we may not have even made the play-offs but I still think that to suggest 'no TSI = relegation within a few years' is a massive leap of logic. Don't forget that even with our crappy pre-Roberts team we had already beaten West Ham, Birmingham and almost Southampton.


With the likes of Kebe and Federici playing who but for the arrival of TSI would surely have been (sold) offski!

User avatar
Chuckle Brother
Member
Posts: 574
Joined: 11 May 2006 09:50

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Chuckle Brother » 15 Apr 2012 08:05

Royal Ginger Generally quite happy with the idea of TSI, and everyone at the club is saying all of the right things, i only really have 2 concerns which can perhaps be put to rest by someone more knowledgeable on here.

1. What sort of return is TSI looking for on their investment, and over what period?

2. And just how involved is Anton going to get in the everyday. E.g will we see his cousin turn up with his boots.


If we go through 95% of the summer without signing anyone of note as usual, might not be a bad thing.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6482
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by PieEater » 15 Apr 2012 08:10

The TSI investment has definitely helped us through this injury crisis. Without their money we wouldn't have loaned Mullins on the off chance of injuries, Cywka wouldn't be here and we'd be playing kids or players out of position.

5145 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 368 guests

It is currently 17 Jun 2024 17:15