by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Sep 2012 09:24
by HoneyRoastHoax » 20 Sep 2012 09:28
Alexander Litvinenko You may be right about the design of stadia, but the whole systematic cover-up, the closing of ranks and altering of evidence - and general contempt for the truth is still very relevant.
Allow that to go unpunished on the grounds of economy and what's to stop it happened again?
by Royal Biscuitman » 20 Sep 2012 09:30
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Sep 2012 09:31
by Royal Biscuitman » 20 Sep 2012 09:36
Alexander Litvinenko Extend the "cost" argument elsewhere and we might as well disband much of the criminal justice system.
by HoneyRoastHoax » 20 Sep 2012 09:38
by creative_username_1 » 20 Sep 2012 09:41
by melonhead » 20 Sep 2012 09:43
by HoneyRoastHoax » 20 Sep 2012 09:44
creative_username_1 What exactly do the relatives want? What is 'justice' to them. (I Genuinely don't know what they want the outcome to be)
I believe you can do something about the cover up side of things but not sure how you can do anything about the events
of the actual day. History seems clearer and more organised in history books than empirical reality. I'm not sure how you'd
eliminate that retrospective distortion. How do you factor in events such as Heysel into the police attitudes etc.
There are so many random events happening, it's an uncertain world.
by creative_username_1 » 20 Sep 2012 09:46
by melonhead » 20 Sep 2012 09:48
by cmonurz » 20 Sep 2012 09:59
HoneyRoastHoax AL - I know what you're saying and Im not going to be able to change your mind. It would just be interesting to see how much it would cost and what funding would have to be diverted from more pressing causes. If this is the case then maybe there are crimes from WW2 which affected thousands more people that aren't going to court because its too much cost and effort
by HoneyRoastHoax » 20 Sep 2012 10:02
cmonurzHoneyRoastHoax AL - I know what you're saying and Im not going to be able to change your mind. It would just be interesting to see how much it would cost and what funding would have to be diverted from more pressing causes. If this is the case then maybe there are crimes from WW2 which affected thousands more people that aren't going to court because its too much cost and effort
Well you've stumbled upon an example where proceedings are still continuing - each year we see 90 year old Nazis finally brought to court to face justice for their war crimes.
Each and every cause will be championed by someone. To the relatives of those killed at Hillsborough there will be no more pressing cause than achieving proper justice for their loved ones. Personally, did I give a toss that Dale Cregan was on the loose in Manchester? No. Doesn't mean it wasn't worth the thousands a day the police force was sinking to try to find him though.
by cmonurz » 20 Sep 2012 10:05
by HoneyRoastHoax » 20 Sep 2012 10:18
cmonurz Hillsborough is an active and relevant case, in the same way as if (god forbid) someone close to you or I is determined to have been unlawfully killed, however long ago.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Sep 2012 10:22
HoneyRoastHoax What more can be learned from it? Apart from the pigs were some sh*t
by Negative_Jeff » 20 Sep 2012 10:31
by HoneyRoastHoax » 20 Sep 2012 10:33
Alexander LitvinenkoHoneyRoastHoax What more can be learned from it? Apart from the pigs were some sh*t
What can be leaned is that people will be free to do it again unless there's a threat of punishment.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Sep 2012 11:33
HoneyRoastHoax There is easier threat of punishment now though. The constantly evolving Safety at sports ground act, emergency services legislation, Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 and HSE legislation.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Sep 2012 11:35
Negative_Jeff ..... This is a Liverpool thing ......
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 144 guests