by AthleticoSpizz » 09 Mar 2013 22:38
by joeroyal » 09 Mar 2013 22:45
by AthleticoSpizz » 09 Mar 2013 22:47
by LoyalRoyalFan » 09 Mar 2013 23:30
by joeroyal » 09 Mar 2013 23:40
LoyalRoyalFan Another dire performance as per usual.
by TBM » 10 Mar 2013 00:01
moonwalklikebasVictor Meldrew So come on Brian,what has Nicky Shorey done?
It must be something really,really bad.
Just to remind you,
Shorey is a better dead-ball kicker than Harte
Shorey is younger and quicker than Harte
Shorey is a better positional player than Harte
Shorey doesn't point a finger at everybody else when he makes a mistake
Shorey was presumably bought to take the place of the elderly Harte.
I can just see Shorey being brought back in to face Valencia and Walcott (a bit harder than facing Wigan and Villa at home)and Brian being delighted that he appears to do no better than Harte (forgetting the standard of the opposition.
Thanks Harte for dragging the rest down to your level.
Harte is probably our best player for positional play
Harte is slow and always has been, it's never been in his game.
Harte as every right to point the finger with Jobi in front of him.
I'd hate to be call elderly at 34.
Ian Harte is well known for having a wand for a left foot so your dead ball line also is utter BS.
Don't hate the player, hate the game
by Royalee » 10 Mar 2013 01:00
by RoyallyFcuked » 10 Mar 2013 01:21
by bre » 10 Mar 2013 01:37
RoyallyFcuked The way Harte fell over today, LOL. Dont reckon it will be the last we will of see that.
But it should be last we see of Harte in the PL, (wont be though) he is another player its just time to drop. Shorey is a better player in terms of what he can give the team. His set pieces and crossing is pretty similar, and with him in the side we wouldnt have the constant problem which is Harte's lack of pace. I dont know about todays game but at the game before at Everton, every one of his deliveries was overhit and/or shite, except the one HRK scored from. Basically I think we conceding far more goals due to his lack of pace than we are scoring from his deliveries.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 10 Mar 2013 09:53
by moonwalklikebas » 10 Mar 2013 10:04
by Matt de K » 11 Mar 2013 10:47
by TBM » 11 Mar 2013 12:12
by BR2 » 11 Mar 2013 12:37
TBM lol, i still don't know how he managed to fall over
by Cobi » 11 Mar 2013 12:42
Royalee Both goals down Harte and McAnuff's side yet again today, what a surprise.
by Taffster » 11 Mar 2013 12:43
Matt de K
by joeroyal » 11 Mar 2013 12:51
moonwalklikebas Shock both goals came from Hartes side. He usually left two on one because Mcanuff does not track back and cover his man. Why is no one else seeing that. If you leave a retiring player on his own with two Pacey wingers there is only going to be one outcome. Stop pointing the finger at Harte because it's too easy to do do.
And to blame Harte for the first goal is just a joke.
HRK tracks back, works like a farm dog and keeps putting in a shift, gives Kelly good cover and also tries to beat a man.
Ask anyone that's actually played on the wing, your job is take the surging full back and leave your full back with the winger. Otherwise it's two on one which happens every fcking week!!!
by joeroyal » 11 Mar 2013 12:53
joeroyalmoonwalklikebas Shock both goals came from Hartes side. He usually left two on one because Mcanuff does not track back and cover his man. Why is no one else seeing that. If you leave a retiring player on his own with two Pacey wingers there is only going to be one outcome. Stop pointing the finger at Harte because it's too easy to do do.
And to blame Harte for the first goal is just a joke.
HRK tracks back, works like a farm dog and keeps putting in a shift, gives Kelly good cover and also tries to beat a man.
Ask anyone that's actually played on the wing, your job is take the surging full back and leave your full back with the winger. Otherwise it's two on one which happens every fcking week!!!
He might work like a farm dog but has the skill of a farm donkey
by royal67 » 11 Mar 2013 12:58
moonwalklikebas Shock both goals came from Hartes side. He usually left two on one because Mcanuff does not track back and cover his man.
by joeroyal » 11 Mar 2013 14:34
royal67moonwalklikebas Shock both goals came from Hartes side. He usually left two on one because Mcanuff does not track back and cover his man.
You are joking right.....?? McAnuff spends more time in the LB position than Harte does. By the time that Jobi is back near the 18 yard box filling the gap left by his team mate, Harte is still wheezing his way back across the half way line. The reason that Jobi isn't as effective going forward as he should be is that he knows, if (when) he loses the ball in an advanced position, he's going to have to track back and defend the oppositions attack himself. Harte may as well not the on the pitch for most of the match. Hartes one redeeming feature, his dead ball delivery seems to have left him too. No way he should be starting in front of Shorey (who, incidentally isn't the long tem solution).....
Users browsing this forum: cornflake and 131 guests