by Samrfc01 » 13 Apr 2013 10:19
by SCIAG » 13 Apr 2013 12:57
AirRaidSirenfloyd__streete No, because he is massively overrated.
I will agree.
Kebe isn't consistent enough to be a 'great' player. Sometimes he is frustrating to watch, other times magical.
by SydenhamRoyal » 13 Apr 2013 13:35
SCIAGAirRaidSirenfloyd__streete No, because he is massively overrated.
I will agree.
Kebe isn't consistent enough to be a 'great' player. Sometimes he is frustrating to watch, other times magical.
The consistency charge is levelled against him all the time. I think it's a load of rubbish tbh.
Don't get me wrong, when we first signed him he was very inconsistent and useless in front of goal. When McDermott came in he started winning us matches and scoring goals, but was still inconsistent. Then for the past 18 months or so he's not had a bad game, he's been putting in 7/10 shifts every week, doing great defensive work, winning headers, and so forth. I think he's a very consistent player now, the only problem is he's been too injury prone, and maybe hasn't put in as many match winning performances.
I think he's one of the better players in the bottom half. If not for his injury troubles, the gap would be smaller and he'd be looking at a big money move.
by creative_username_1 » 13 Apr 2013 13:59
Archie's penalty I think it's no surprise that our attacking threat has almost entirely disappeared since Kebe got injured. So simple question, could we have stayed up if Kebe had stayed fit?
by redscot » 13 Apr 2013 14:22
by Royal With Cheese » 13 Apr 2013 15:14
creative_username_1Archie's penalty I think it's no surprise that our attacking threat has almost entirely disappeared since Kebe got injured. So simple question, could we have stayed up if Kebe had stayed fit?
What is the point of this type of discussion. I can say anything and no-one can disprove it
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 89 guests