by TBM » 18 Jul 2014 00:07
by P!ssed Off » 18 Jul 2014 00:29
by Irvinchangeyaname » 18 Jul 2014 07:33
by paultheroyal » 18 Jul 2014 08:09
TBM Can we buy the title now?
And Siggy
by PieEater » 18 Jul 2014 10:25
by From Despair To Where? » 18 Jul 2014 11:01
by Royal Biscuitman » 18 Jul 2014 11:39
Spend his own money or spend money his football club can borrow from lenders?PieEater The only difference is that he seems more willing to spend it than SJM.
by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 18 Jul 2014 12:36
Royal BiscuitmanSpend his own money or spend money his football club can borrow from lenders?PieEater The only difference is that he seems more willing to spend it than SJM.
by Royal Biscuitman » 18 Jul 2014 12:59
Tommy Youlden's EarsRoyal BiscuitmanSpend his own money or spend money his football club can borrow from lenders?PieEater The only difference is that he seems more willing to spend it than SJM.
Why would you spend your own money when you can borrow it against the club?
by RG7Fan » 18 Jul 2014 13:59
From Despair To Where? Personally I'll be callling for SJM's head if Carlos Slim, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett aren't in the consortium
by Nameless » 18 Jul 2014 14:06
RG7FanFrom Despair To Where? Personally I'll be callling for SJM's head if Carlos Slim, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett aren't in the consortium
The most inappropriately named man in the world
by windermere_royal » 18 Jul 2014 14:55
by PieEater » 18 Jul 2014 15:34
From Despair To Where? But he is just one of a number of people in the consortium who who have had their individual wealth speculated at being in the billions.
by Silver Fox » 18 Jul 2014 20:39
windermere_royal If he is a sterling billionaire then yes we could well be rich, but if he is a Thai baht billionaire (55 to the pound) then we will still have the annual black hole
by From Despair To Where? » 18 Jul 2014 22:39
PieEaterFrom Despair To Where? But he is just one of a number of people in the consortium who who have had their individual wealth speculated at being in the billions.
As I've said before, why would anyone be in a consortium to throw money away at a trophy asset and not get the glory of publicly owning that asset?
Personally I think talk of this consortium is about as credible as TSI.
by AthleticoSpizz » 18 Jul 2014 22:42
Users browsing this forum: Franchise FC, Google Adsense [Bot], tidus_mi2 and 320 guests