The Enfield Royal71 To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
oof
that's gotta hurt
by Maneki Neko » 04 Nov 2019 14:38
The Enfield Royal71 To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
by Millsy » 04 Nov 2019 14:57
by Zip » 04 Nov 2019 15:09
HoundStranded So just to clarify, most are of the belief that Swift's free kick was unlucky and worth a go but URZZZ thinks that it may have been a better option to play the ball in so that it could be contested? Both pretty valid views especially as Swift didn't score.
The rest of most of the last two pages have then essentially been willy waving?
What's wrong with it is justifying the opinion with comments like 'no danger of it going in', 'keeper wasn't worried' and 'it went over' (it didn't)
None of which are really valid.
It is this week's Miazga 3 game ban pointless argument though. Actually thought the free kicks overall were a good mix this week, even if none were actually executed quite right. Some shots, some high crosses, some low pull backs. Good to see us keeping them guessing, though some ended in a shambles.
by WestYorksRoyal » 04 Nov 2019 15:44
2 world wars, 1 world cup We were doing well.
Then Blackett came on.
by Hound » 04 Nov 2019 15:58
ZipHoundStranded So just to clarify, most are of the belief that Swift's free kick was unlucky and worth a go but URZZZ thinks that it may have been a better option to play the ball in so that it could be contested? Both pretty valid views especially as Swift didn't score.
The rest of most of the last two pages have then essentially been willy waving?
What's wrong with it is justifying the opinion with comments like 'no danger of it going in', 'keeper wasn't worried' and 'it went over' (it didn't)
None of which are really valid.
It is this week's Miazga 3 game ban pointless argument though. Actually thought the free kicks overall were a good mix this week, even if none were actually executed quite right. Some shots, some high crosses, some low pull backs. Good to see us keeping them guessing, though some ended in a shambles.
You’ve gone from a Hound to a pit bull recently.
by Snowflake Royal » 04 Nov 2019 17:18
Maneki NekoThe Enfield Royal71 To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
oof
that's gotta hurt
by Lower West » 04 Nov 2019 18:26
2 world wars, 1 world cup We were doing well.
Then Blackett came on.
Snowflake RoyalManeki NekoThe Enfield Royal71 To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
oof
that's gotta hurt
S'alright. It'll be genome and me again in a minute. Or OMA and JS. Or platy. You get the point.
by URZZZZ » 04 Nov 2019 18:43
Maneki NekoThe Enfield Royal71 To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
oof
that's gotta hurt
by The Enfield Royal71 » 04 Nov 2019 19:02
Old Man AndrewsSnowflake RoyalManeki Neko
oof
that's gotta hurt
S'alright. It'll be genome and me again in a minute. Or OMA and JS. Or platy. You get the point.
Could end up being all of us in one swoop.
by NewCorkSeth » 04 Nov 2019 19:20
by URZZZZ » 04 Nov 2019 19:36
NewCorkSeth Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
by Zip » 04 Nov 2019 19:41
NewCorkSeth Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
by NewCorkSeth » 04 Nov 2019 20:02
ZipNewCorkSeth Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
I think you’re a oxf*rd tbf
by The Enfield Royal71 » 04 Nov 2019 20:10
URZZZZNewCorkSeth Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
New spinoff thread?
by Zip » 04 Nov 2019 20:12
NewCorkSethZipNewCorkSeth Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
I think you’re a oxf*rd tbf
Thank you. All I wanted was a little recognition.
by Hound » 04 Nov 2019 20:15
The Enfield Royal71URZZZZNewCorkSeth Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
New spinoff thread?
No need.
1) you
2) snowflid royal
3) denver royal
4) vic meldrew
5) woodley royal
by The Enfield Royal71 » 04 Nov 2019 20:17
HoundThe Enfield Royal71URZZZZ
New spinoff thread?
No need.
1) you
2) snowflid royal
3) denver royal
4) vic meldrew
5) woodley royal
Thought Denver and Urrzzz were 1&2? You changed your mind?
by Zip » 04 Nov 2019 20:19
The Enfield Royal71HoundThe Enfield Royal71
No need.
1) you
2) snowflid royal
3) denver royal
4) vic meldrew
5) woodley royal
Thought Denver and Urrzzz were 1&2? You changed your mind?
The top 5 are interchangeable between themselves.
Urzzz has had a mare today, and snowflake has been mocking mental health and disabled people.
by URZZZZ » 04 Nov 2019 20:22
ZipThe Enfield Royal71Hound
Thought Denver and Urrzzz were 1&2? You changed your mind?
The top 5 are interchangeable between themselves.
Urzzz has had a mare today, and snowflake has been mocking mental health and disabled people.
....and yet you refer to him as “Snowflid Royal”.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Polish International, RG30 and 297 guests