Snowflake Royal I think you're a few decades behind the world.
by South Coast Royal » 22 Mar 2022 16:48
Snowflake Royal I think you're a few decades behind the world.
by South Coast Royal » 22 Mar 2022 16:50
Hound Didn’t follow things that closely but it must have been pretty obvious some dodgy stuff was going on when they were constantly buying players, not filing accounts and selling their stadium for an obscenely overblown sum
With us, and just scanning various message boards etc, we gambled, failed and accepted the beats. Haven’t seen a single whinge from our fans about the deduction. We did wrong and accepted the punishment we knew we were getting. And other fans seem to respect that to an extent
by Hendo » 22 Mar 2022 16:56
Snowflake RoyalSouth Coast RoyalSnowflake Royal Balls, they've defended the club and not taken issue with its spending.
My mate who I play golf with every week hasn't defended the club nor any other fans that he knows.
Theirs is a feeling of disappointment and anger at the owners and the board.
Have we defended our owners and cried about our points deduction?
No.
We serfs just get what we are given, it's the way the professional game works even if there are signs of changes ahead within the game.
Yeah, loads have defended our owners and welcomed their bullshit.
Like, literally a few weeks ago there were people defending them saying they've done a good job, saved us and its all the managers' fault.
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 22 Mar 2022 16:58
Snowflake Royal Balls, they've defended the club and not taken issue with its spending.
by Snowflake Royal » 22 Mar 2022 17:13
South Coast RoyalSnowflake Royal I think you're a few decades behind the world.
by South Coast Royal » 22 Mar 2022 17:14
Snowflake RoyalSouth Coast RoyalSnowflake Royal I think you're a few decades behind the world.
Yr and Tea ladies
by Snowflake Royal » 22 Mar 2022 19:10
South Coast RoyalSnowflake RoyalSouth Coast Royal
Yr and Tea ladies
Not me that mentioned tea ladies.
by South Coast Royal » 22 Mar 2022 19:21
Snowflake RoyalSouth Coast RoyalSnowflake Royal Yr and Tea ladies
Not me that mentioned tea ladies.
Yes. You aren’t YR, are you.
by Snowflake Royal » 22 Mar 2022 21:41
South Coast RoyalSnowflake RoyalSouth Coast Royal
Not me that mentioned tea ladies.
Yes. You aren’t YR, are you.
Why quote me then?
I thought by now as a veteran and our most regular poster you would know how to use the quote system. :
Anyway, please have the last word as you love to do.
by Mr Angry » 23 Mar 2022 08:59
by Silver Fox » 23 Mar 2022 09:01
by NathStPaul » 23 Mar 2022 09:04
Mr Angry Isn't "Rival Watch" supposed to be about other teams in our Division, rather than individual posters having a go at each other?
by South Coast Royal » 23 Mar 2022 10:31
Mr Angry Isn't "Rival Watch" supposed to be about other teams in our Division, rather than individual posters having a go at each other?
by South Coast Royal » 23 Mar 2022 10:34
NathStPaulMr Angry Isn't "Rival Watch" supposed to be about other teams in our Division, rather than individual posters having a go at each other?
To be fair Vic deserves all he gets.
by paultheroyal » 23 Mar 2022 12:52
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Mar 2022 12:53
paultheroyal Hold on is OMA, Kes etc etc - Nath?
by NathStPaul » 23 Mar 2022 12:56
Snowflake Royalpaultheroyal Hold on is OMA, Kes etc etc - Nath?
Nath is OMA, yes.
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Mar 2022 12:58
NathStPaulSnowflake Royalpaultheroyal Hold on is OMA, Kes etc etc - Nath?
Nath is OMA, yes.
Not technically true. There were two OMA's, shared login.
by NathStPaul » 23 Mar 2022 13:06
Snowflake RoyalNathStPaulSnowflake Royal Nath is OMA, yes.
Not technically true. There were two OMA's, shared login.
You going to claim you were the sane non-arsehole of the pair?
by John Smith » 23 Mar 2022 16:48
NathStPaulSnowflake RoyalNathStPaul Not technically true. There were two OMA's, shared login.
You going to claim you were the sane non-arsehole of the pair?
If you look at the OMA persona there was a reasonable side and a more spiky side. It was certainly all me in the last 6 months of the accounts existence. You'll have to give me specific examples of things said in order for me to tell you if I said it or not (if you can be bothered). Certainly not claiming to have not said questionable things if thats what you're getting at, definitely went too far sometimes. It's why with the new account I wanted to be clear who it is and be more accountable as it is a user name I use for many different social media.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 246 guests