MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

238 posts
Bristol Paul
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 12:43
Location: Guess?

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Bristol Paul » 16 Dec 2022 22:11

Hound
Bristol Paul Just don’t know what this teams style,of play is, just seems completely random. Whatever, constant defensive errors make everything else irrelevant. Yiadom really is crap.


Random choice to criticise :)

There were about 7 others in line before him to have a go at

Not really, he’s constantly poor, can’t pass, can’t cross, poor control. Others are poor sometimes, he’s poor always.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 40600
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Snowflake Royal » 16 Dec 2022 22:20

I think Yiadom is suffering a little from age and a fair amount from team shape.

Give him a simple RB job to do, and he's perfectly decent.

Bristol Paul
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 12:43
Location: Guess?

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Bristol Paul » 16 Dec 2022 22:20

Snowflake Royal I think Yiadom is suffering a little from age and a fair amount from team shape.

Give him a simple RB job to do, and he's perfectly decent.

Fair comment

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Zip » 16 Dec 2022 22:52

Snowflake Royal I think Yiadom is suffering a little from age and a fair amount from team shape.

Give him a simple RB job to do, and he's perfectly decent.


He has only just turned 31!
He has never been a wing back because he can't cross. I may have mentioned this before 8) but yes agree he is fine as a right back.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 40600
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Snowflake Royal » 16 Dec 2022 22:53

Zip
Snowflake Royal I think Yiadom is suffering a little from age and a fair amount from team shape.

Give him a simple RB job to do, and he's perfectly decent.


He has only just turned 31!
He has never been a wing back because he can't cross. I may have mentioned this before 8) but yes agree he is fine as a right back.

31 is getting on for a footballer. Certainly several years past prime.

Sorry zip, I'm old and you're ancient.


URZZZZ
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7329
Joined: 20 Apr 2013 18:30

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by URZZZZ » 16 Dec 2022 22:56

Zip
Snowflake Royal I think Yiadom is suffering a little from age and a fair amount from team shape.

Give him a simple RB job to do, and he's perfectly decent.


He has only just turned 31!
He has never been a wing back because he can't cross. I may have mentioned this before 8) but yes agree he is fine as a right back.


Think he’s had a fairly good season in the RCB role but was poor tonight

Yiadom and Rahman as the two WB’s was a dreadful choice. Rahman doesn’t take a man on, neither create, they can’t cross. Really struggling with that call. We looked much better with Hoilett and NGW on. Can Ince not see it?

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Zip » 16 Dec 2022 23:02

URZZZZ
Zip
Snowflake Royal I think Yiadom is suffering a little from age and a fair amount from team shape.

Give him a simple RB job to do, and he's perfectly decent.


He has only just turned 31!
He has never been a wing back because he can't cross. I may have mentioned this before 8) but yes agree he is fine as a right back.


Think he’s had a fairly good season in the RCB role but was poor tonight

Yiadom and Rahman as the two WB’s was a dreadful choice. Rahman doesn’t take a man on, neither create, they can’t cross. Really struggling with that call. We looked much better with Hoilett and NGW on. Can Ince not see it?


Time to give NGW another start ahead of Rahman. Ince always seems to prefer the older head though.
Junior was a bit off v Coventry but is probably our best crosser.

oldebiscuit
Member
Posts: 503
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 22:07

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by oldebiscuit » 16 Dec 2022 23:07

Loafer
Orion1871 I forgot Birmingham was the club with the idiot fans that shout "who" whenever the opposition make a sub. More embarrassing than our defending.

Not as embarrassing as club1871



Or y26/26

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Zip » 16 Dec 2022 23:13

Snowflake Royal
Zip
Snowflake Royal I think Yiadom is suffering a little from age and a fair amount from team shape.

Give him a simple RB job to do, and he's perfectly decent.


He has only just turned 31!
He has never been a wing back because he can't cross. I may have mentioned this before 8) but yes agree he is fine as a right back.

31 is getting on for a footballer. Certainly several years past prime.

Sorry zip, I'm old and you're ancient.


You're old and small. I'm just beautiful.


JR
Member
Posts: 843
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 12:53

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by JR » 16 Dec 2022 23:17

Zip
URZZZZ
Zip
He has only just turned 31!
He has never been a wing back because he can't cross. I may have mentioned this before 8) but yes agree he is fine as a right back.


Think he’s had a fairly good season in the RCB role but was poor tonight

Yiadom and Rahman as the two WB’s was a dreadful choice. Rahman doesn’t take a man on, neither create, they can’t cross. Really struggling with that call. We looked much better with Hoilett and NGW on. Can Ince not see it?


Time to give NGW another start ahead of Rahman. Ince always seems to prefer the older head though.
Junior was a bit off v Coventry but is probably our best crosser.


Rahman’s automatic first choice selection for Reading and Ghana baffles me - at best he is bangs average. Probably the least inspiring full back in 30 years for Reading.

Elm Park Kid
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2062
Joined: 05 Feb 2013 10:45

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Elm Park Kid » 16 Dec 2022 23:19

Snowflake Royal
Hound
Elm Park Kid The moment I saw the defense lineup I knew that we were in trouble this evening. You need a bit of experience and steel at the back in a game like this and we were obviously going to struggle.

Just need to write it off and stay positive. Our half season points total is more than good enough - hopefully get a win against Swansea and we'll just need 20 points for the rest of the season.


Defence plenty experienced enough. Just made stupid errors

Yeah. Sarr's 29, Yiadom 31, Rahman 28. All played plenty of games. Hell, McIntyre has almost 80 appearances.

And for steel, Sarr, Yiadom and McIntyre have plenty.


How many games have Sarr, McIntryre and Mbengue played together as CBs?

URZZZZ
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7329
Joined: 20 Apr 2013 18:30

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by URZZZZ » 16 Dec 2022 23:31

Thought Ince got the selection wrong but we played fairly well on the whole, without over threatening. You could say that on another day we’d be coming home with the points but when you make so many defensive mistakes, you get what you deserve. The first goal was the worst. Cold night, opportunity to climb up to 5th before the other games and we give away a goal like that. Lumley miskicks, Rahman is on his back foot and then Loum’s error. Not good enough from the three of them

In saying that, Loum had a better game than his recent ones. He had a good second half and Hendrick had a good first half and I thought we had the better of the midfield overall which hasn’t always been the case this season. I’m guessing Ince agreed as he usually swaps Loum and Fornah for each other which wasn’t the case tonight

Surprised Carroll and NGW didn’t come on sooner. Birmingham were clearly sitting in and inviting us to play more direct yet he went with Joao first. He did score but offered little else. We were a lot more threatening with the former two on, along with Hoilett who has to be one of the first names on the team sheet

Lumley - 5

Mbengue - 4
Sarr - 5
McIntyre - 5

Yiadom - 5
Hendrick - 6
Loum - 6
Rahman - 5

Ince - 6
Long - 5
Meite - 7

Joao - 6
Hoilett - 7
Carroll - 7
NGW - 6

Notts Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1018
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 00:07

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Notts Royal » 17 Dec 2022 00:18

Bearing in mind we have just 1 player (NGW) suited to playing wingback, is there not a case for changing to 4 at the back? 3-5-2 rarely works and we don’t have the players to play the formation effectively, yet since persists with it


Notts Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1018
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 00:07

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Notts Royal » 17 Dec 2022 00:26

Snowflake Royal Any chance this might result in some time for Guiness-Walker? Because Rahman can neither defend nor cross, nor shoot.


One of the most overrated, couldn’t give a toss, players we’ve had in recent years. But some love him for a few Instagram posts

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7336
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by tidus_mi2 » 17 Dec 2022 00:46

Why do we even bother with corners from the left? The inswingers from the right footer are just garbage, might as well go short and retain possession

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25013
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by Hound » 17 Dec 2022 08:06

Notts Royal Bearing in mind we have just 1 player (NGW) suited to playing wingback, is there not a case for changing to 4 at the back? 3-5-2 rarely works and we don’t have the players to play the formation effectively, yet since persists with it


Hoilett can do the job pretty well. Don’t mind Yiadom playing it but it has to be balanced with NGW on the left. NGW looked decent in the 15 mins or so he had

One positive I suppose was 2nd game running the subs made an impact. It’s good to have those options

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8090
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by windermereROYAL » 17 Dec 2022 08:20

The usual over reaction over on twatter and from the resident twat on here, granted we contributed greatly to our own downfall but on another day we win that comfortably.
Ruddy made some decent saves and we basically dictated play yes you could argue Brum sat back but we had more in the first half too.
with 20 efforts on goal you don`t expect to leave empty handed, but it was on sky so it`s no real surprise,
A couple of takes for me, Rahman needs to be benched, he doesn`t seem to know what a forward pass is, and despite the returning hero worship Shane Long should only ever be used as an impact sub.

hughsies no.1
Member
Posts: 511
Joined: 30 Sep 2004 10:50

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by hughsies no.1 » 17 Dec 2022 09:33

Mistakes cost us, granted. Not buying into us being the better team as Brum did a job on us and just needed to manage the game. A few things I noticed from the tactical side of our game that wound me up -

- how many times the player were recycling the ball at the back then eventually goes back to Lumley to lump forward, I counted only twice we broke the lines from the back into Hendrick which then led onto good Chances. Surely that has to be looked at
- first goal was so avoidable, Baba had a chance to drive forward, yet he turned back and recycled the ball and we then gave it away then 1-0. Have they been told not to drive forward?
- 25 mins to go, why AC wasn’t on I have no idea, look at how the Dutch went wide and diagonally into the box in their game against Argentina and the problems it caused whilst chasing the game
- Fornah and NGW have to be starting every week

Overall I’m a fan of Ince and he’s done more than what’s been asked of him since coming in, he has a thankless task with the resources available to him with our embargo etc, BUT if we stay in this league and can spend again is he the man to take us forward? He’s earned a chance if he keeps us up. But I’m not sure he’s the man

User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12829
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by paultheroyal » 17 Dec 2022 10:16

Let’s ignore the goals for a minute (will come back to that) but I thought we were excellent. People go on about stats, I don’t, but looking at them we were amazing and dominated.

What did lumley have to do other than pick the ball out of the net. We were more direct, created countless opportunities and on another day lauding a brilliant performance. Meite was superb and one of his best games in a Reading shirt. Sky commentators did my fruit in last night with the love in with Birmingham and Deeney. I thought they were very poor.

First goal, we were off it from the kick off, watch it back and you will see how slow we were at initial closedown way before cross went in. It was all just half hearted. Same for penalty, yes it was, shouldn’t of challenged like that but also it was a dive. Played for contact. Third goal summed up the previous two goals.

So basically we gifted them 3 goals. But between all that I thought we were excellent. One of the most strangest games I have witnessed in a very long time. If we scored that 2nd five mins earlier we would of drawn that game.

Hendrick was very poor I thought. Baba is doing my head in. Yiadom of last year god knows where he has gone.

This is a strange post to make but it’s how I am feeling. I am expecting a reaction against Swansea, certainly defensively but also more of the positive forward play too.

Have a good weekend.

User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7563
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (a)

by stealthpapes » 17 Dec 2022 10:24

My seat.

LOL

That first 30 minutes.

LOL

Other than that, we were dominant without ever dominating. There was one bit along the left where three, if not four players, made half a yard then remembered they couldn't kick with their left foot. Ball went back. Momentum over.

Last few minutes, turns out that having an actual once-top-level player on the pitch makes a difference. Shocked as defenders struggle when stretched and moved around.

I also had the last laugh as I had indeed come in a taxi.

238 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 315 guests

It is currently 15 Jun 2024 19:27