#SellBeforeWeDai (to someone fit and proper)“ supporters action group

[From Despair To Where?]

You need to grow a pair.


Of brain cells.

[Greatwesternline]

People also have short memories with regards to EFL punishments. We recently as a club got a game abandoned, which meant Port Vale had to travel to our ground twice, the second time on a weeknight (so had smaller away following) and lost.

Did we get a points deduction as the FA rules allow? No we got a suspended sentence. Anyone who thinks the EFL has it in for us needs to give their head a wobble.

They showed incredible leniency in that regard.

[genome]

You need to grow a pair.


Of brain cells.

Me? Bit harsh

[NathStPaul]

Have you read his other posts? It's articulate, measured and mature in comparison. He's always been an absolute clown.

This is not wrong.

However the EFL does need a better way of dealing with owners who do this, We are not the first case. The rules needs to be reviewed as it very much means that rogue owners can destroy clubs seemingly on a whim. What these rules can be is up for discussion but something needs to change.

Childish hidden messages and wishing death on people very much undermines what we as a fan base are trying to do.

Of course no one would actually do that last part. The Maxwell's boat bit is quite obviously a joke but airing frustration at what's going on.

Grow a pair.

You are a Bournemouth supporter.

[Orion1871]

People also have short memories with regards to EFL punishments. We recently as a club got a game abandoned, which meant Port Vale had to travel to our ground twice, the second time on a weeknight (so had smaller away following) and lost.

Did we get a points deduction as the FA rules allow? No we got a suspended sentence. Anyone who thinks the EFL has it in for us needs to give their head a wobble.

They showed incredible leniency in that regard.

Tbf We got the same punishment as Blackpool did for the same thing. It's not leniency, (edit) not completely anyway, it's following the precedent that was set.

[Reading4eva]

You need to grow a pair.


Of brain cells.

How long did it take you to think of that one

[Reading4eva]

This is not wrong.

However the EFL does need a better way of dealing with owners who do this, We are not the first case. The rules needs to be reviewed as it very much means that rogue owners can destroy clubs seemingly on a whim. What these rules can be is up for discussion but something needs to change.

Childish hidden messages and wishing death on people very much undermines what we as a fan base are trying to do.

Of course no one would actually do that last part. The Maxwell's boat bit is quite obviously a joke but airing frustration at what's going on.

Grow a pair.

You are a Bournemouth supporter.

You really are one boring fecker aren't you.

Like plankton at the bottom of the sea, utterly pointless

[leon]

You need to grow a pair.


Of brain cells.

Me? Bit harsh

yeah Genomers, you.

Finally someone has had the balls to say it.

[NathStPaul]

Of course no one would actually do that last part. The Maxwell's boat bit is quite obviously a joke but airing frustration at what's going on.

Grow a pair.

You are a Bournemouth supporter.

You really are one boring fecker aren't you.

Like plankton at the bottom of the sea, utterly pointless

Plankton is actually pretty vital to marine life.

You support Bournemouth and have a shite Youtube channel.

I'd rather be plankton.

[genome]

Yeah. Plankton sustains a shit ton of life and is vital to the ecosystem. I don't think Bournemouth4eva thought that one through.

[Greatwesternline]

People also have short memories with regards to EFL punishments. We recently as a club got a game abandoned, which meant Port Vale had to travel to our ground twice, the second time on a weeknight (so had smaller away following) and lost.

Did we get a points deduction as the FA rules allow? No we got a suspended sentence. Anyone who thinks the EFL has it in for us needs to give their head a wobble.

They showed incredible leniency in that regard.

Tbf We got the same punishment as Blackpool did for the same thing. It's not leniency it's following the precedent that was set.

True albeit in that scenario it was the last game of the season and a points deduction would have no outcome on the destinations of either club, one was still relegated and one was mid table.

Our is different in that the season still has time to play out, and all outcomes are still possible for both teams. It's a weird precedent to set because if your team is short of a few players due to injury or suspension why not get the game abandoned and play it again later in the season when hopefully those players are back.

[morganb]

Somebody from SBWD on TalkSport at the moment

[windermereROYAL]

Somebody from SBWD on TalkSport at the moment

Elm park royal

[NathStPaul]

Somebody from SBWD on TalkSport at the moment

Elm park royal

That will put a lot of butts in seats.

[From Despair To Where?]

You need to grow a pair.


Of brain cells.

How long did it take you to think of that one

About 2 seconds. If you don't like it, fcuk off back to your Bournemouth vlog. I mean, you went pretty much AWOL from here for a couple of years until, all of a sudden, you've got a vlog to promote so roll your eyes all you want, your return seems somewhat opportunistic

[RoyalBlue]

People also have short memories with regards to EFL punishments. We recently as a club got a game abandoned, which meant Port Vale had to travel to our ground twice, the second time on a weeknight (so had smaller away following) and lost.

Did we get a points deduction as the FA rules allow? No we got a suspended sentence. Anyone who thinks the EFL has it in for us needs to give their head a wobble.

They showed incredible leniency in that regard.

Tbf We got the same punishment as Blackpool did for the same thing. It's not leniency it's following the precedent that was set.

True albeit in that scenario it was the last game of the season and a points deduction would have no outcome on the destinations of either club, one was still relegated and one was mid table.

Our is different in that the season still has time to play out, and all outcomes are still possible for both teams. It's a weird precedent to set because if your team is short of a few players due to injury or suspension why not get the game abandoned and play it again later in the season when hopefully those players are back.

Veering off topic but maybe providing further evidence of how football governing bodies make strange calls around the world, a game was abandoned a couple of seasons ago in MLS due to lightning. MLS decreed it should be resumed from the minute and score of abandonment and that both teams could only field the same squads that they had done for the original game. This was despite the rearranged game taking place months later and after a transfer window had taken place! Furthermore, no allowance was made for players from the original game who were injured at the time of the rearranged/resumed fixture

[Greatwesternline]

Tbf We got the same punishment as Blackpool did for the same thing. It's not leniency it's following the precedent that was set.

True albeit in that scenario it was the last game of the season and a points deduction would have no outcome on the destinations of either club, one was still relegated and one was mid table.

Our is different in that the season still has time to play out, and all outcomes are still possible for both teams. It's a weird precedent to set because if your team is short of a few players due to injury or suspension why not get the game abandoned and play it again later in the season when hopefully those players are back.

Veering off topic but maybe providing further evidence of how football governing bodies make strange calls around the world, a game was abandoned a couple of seasons ago in MLS due to lightning. MLS decreed it should be resumed from the minute and score of abandonment and that both teams could only field the same squads that they had done for the original game. This was despite the rearranged game taking place months later and after a transfer window had taken place! Furthermore, no allowance was made for players from the original game who were injured at the time of the rearranged/resumed fixture

I actually love that. Putting serious effort into making sure the conditions are recreated as much as possible.

[Hendo]

You need to grow a pair.


Of brain cells.

How long did it take you to think of that one

About 2 seconds. If you don't like it, fcuk off back to your Bournemouth vlog. I mean, you went pretty much AWOL from here for a couple of years until, all of a sudden, you've got a vlog to promote so roll your eyes all you want, your return seems somewhat opportunistic

Lol. That is so true.

13/11/2019
10/02/2020
17/03/2020 - 23/03/2020 (AE posts)
27/09/2021 - only to promote his interview with Andy Bernal
02/12/2023

[Hendo]

People also have short memories with regards to EFL punishments. We recently as a club got a game abandoned, which meant Port Vale had to travel to our ground twice, the second time on a weeknight (so had smaller away following) and lost.

Did we get a points deduction as the FA rules allow? No we got a suspended sentence. Anyone who thinks the EFL has it in for us needs to give their head a wobble.

They showed incredible leniency in that regard.

Tbf We got the same punishment as Blackpool did for the same thing. It's not leniency it's following the precedent that was set.

True albeit in that scenario it was the last game of the season and a points deduction would have no outcome on the destinations of either club, one was still relegated and one was mid table.

Our is different in that the season still has time to play out, and all outcomes are still possible for both teams. It's a weird precedent to set because if your team is short of a few players due to injury or suspension why not get the game abandoned and play it again later in the season when hopefully those players are back.

Because that's probably against the rules and would likely result in the offending club being thrown out of the league for bringing the game into disrepute.

[Greatwesternline]

Tbf We got the same punishment as Blackpool did for the same thing. It's not leniency it's following the precedent that was set.

True albeit in that scenario it was the last game of the season and a points deduction would have no outcome on the destinations of either club, one was still relegated and one was mid table.

Our is different in that the season still has time to play out, and all outcomes are still possible for both teams. It's a weird precedent to set because if your team is short of a few players due to injury or suspension why not get the game abandoned and play it again later in the season when hopefully those players are back.

Because that's probably against the rules and would likely result in the offending club being thrown out of the league for bringing the game into disrepute.

fans getting a match abandoned is against the rules. how are you going to prove it. if a set of fans do it?