roadrunner :|
OIC I understand
by muddyfeet » 14 Sep 2011 12:28
roadrunner :|
by roadrunner » 14 Sep 2011 12:32
muddyfeetroadrunner :|
OIC I understand
by Vic_Flange » 14 Sep 2011 12:41
by roadrunner » 14 Sep 2011 12:43
Vic_Flange No folks, Im not snowball, or a newbie; or any combination of the two.
by who are ya? » 14 Sep 2011 12:46
Vic_FlangeTerminal Boardom
The Team Board hits a new low
How very dare you.
I am 6ft 7.
by Terminal Boardom » 14 Sep 2011 12:47
Vic_FlangeTerminal Boardom
The Team Board hits a new low
How very dare you.
I am 6ft 7.
by RobRoyal » 14 Sep 2011 12:49
Royal & Ancient Well thank you R.F.C. for ruining our week. Our Golden Wedding anniversary, superb meal out with loads of friends, big home party with even more and then we go on Saturday to one of the worst games that I can remember in all my 60 + years of supporting this Club. And certainly this is my last as I, as well as the Chairman, can no longer afford to support such dross. My shirt will now be used to clean the car and whether I use my S/T again is open to doubt.Angry - you bet I am.
And, I know that some of you will defend him, but if you get such a negative outlook from SJM (I refuse to recognise the 'gongs' ) then this spreads right through the whole Club and now the supporters! Just thank goodness we did not use the expensive hospitality suite.
So if they go down a Division and more in the future as they deserve then I won't be there.
Goodbye!!!!
by John Peel » 14 Sep 2011 14:46
brendywendyLook, it's a well run club from a financial perspective yes, but it ultimately less ambition of getting into the premiership and establishing itself as a mid-to-lower prem team than your average league two club.
oxf*rd LOLable nonsense
by Svlad Cjelli » 14 Sep 2011 15:20
by brendywendy » 14 Sep 2011 15:46
John PeelbrendywendyLook, it's a well run club from a financial perspective yes, but it ultimately less ambition of getting into the premiership and establishing itself as a mid-to-lower prem team than your average league two club.
oxf*rd LOLable nonsense
Easy to make throw away comments, much harder to enter a debate on my full post. It's not like you BW. Fine, I accept that I exaggerate to make the point, but the point still stands - we don't have the ambition to become what I genuinely think we are capable of becoming - a low-to-middle prem club (like Stoke for example). It's simply a statement of fact. SJM says the same in his own inimitable fashion hence his constant advertising of the club to someone who wants to go for it. I'm not trying to take a cheap shot at the man as he has genuinely done a fantastic job. I just wish,as a Reading fan that they'd have more balls to go for it.
by Royal Rother » 14 Sep 2011 17:12
by John Peel » 14 Sep 2011 19:32
by Royal Rother » 14 Sep 2011 21:18
by jazz » 14 Sep 2011 21:51
Royal & Ancient Well thank you R.F.C. for ruining our week. Our Golden Wedding anniversary, superb meal out with loads of friends, big home party with even more and then we go on Saturday to one of the worst games that I can remember in all my 60 + years of supporting this Club. And certainly this is my last as I, as well as the Chairman, can no longer afford to support such dross. My shirt will now be used to clean the car and whether I use my S/T again is open to doubt.Angry - you bet I am.
And, I know that some of you will defend him, but if you get such a negative outlook from SJM (I refuse to recognise the 'gongs' ) then this spreads right through the whole Club and now the supporters! Just thank goodness we did not use the expensive hospitality suite.
So if they go down a Division and more in the future as they deserve then I won't be there.
Goodbye!!!!
by Svlad Cjelli » 15 Sep 2011 07:51
John Peel Fair dos Brendy!
Svlad, what you describe as 'realism' someone else could quite fairly attribute to lack of ambition. I'll rephrase that actually, lack of 'enough' ambition, because yes you're right we do have some ambition at least. Other clubs decided not to be scared off by the potential failure. Yes, some have cocked up royally by showing too much 'ambition' too quickly but others have succeeded. That's just the world of business for you. SJM isn't prepared to take the risk (fair enough, it's his money) but is desperate for someone else to take on that risk instead. Hence getting someone else in could potentially be a great thing for this club. I don't see many Man City fans complaining (yet!).
by brendywendy » 15 Sep 2011 09:24
by Royal Rother » 15 Sep 2011 09:27
by Silver Fox » 15 Sep 2011 10:25
brendywendy cant agree more with that. the last thing i want for my club if for some random business man to come in, pump a load of money in that he'll want to take back out with profit when he loses eventually interest.
perfectly happy to allow the club to develop in an organic manner, and get success based purely on gradual progress, good planning,spending what we bring in, and development of young players.
and for that i cant think of a better chairman than JM.
i understand that this may not fit with the majority of fans though
by brendywendy » 15 Sep 2011 11:01
by Silver Fox » 15 Sep 2011 11:07