by Extended-Phenotype » 15 Mar 2016 12:53
by genome » 15 Mar 2016 13:02
by Armadillo Roadkill » 15 Mar 2016 13:46
No Fixed Abode And of course managers have NEVER turned form around have they?![]()
So PSG have virtually won the the French League - if they rest players from now until the end of the season and don't win another league game we'll expect Blanc to get the sack? After all it's all about recent form.
by genome » 15 Mar 2016 13:55
No Fixed Abode And of course managers have NEVER turned form around have they?![]()
So PSG have virtually won the the French League - if they rest players from now until the end of the season and don't win another league game we'll expect Blanc to get the sack? After all it's all about recent form.
genomeNo Fixed Abode And of course managers have NEVER turned form around have they?![]()
So PSG have virtually won the the French League - if they rest players from now until the end of the season and don't win another league game we'll expect Blanc to get the sack? After all it's all about recent form.
No, don't be ridiculous.If Clarke had won the league before his downturn in form it would be a completely different situation. Keep trying.
by genome » 15 Mar 2016 14:27
by wingnut » 15 Mar 2016 14:35
genome I didn't just say that it's all about current form. It's not black and white. Read my post again - I said you have to look into the reasons for the current form and not just the numbers and the stats. Look at the reasons for Clarke's good and bad form this season. It'll show you why sacking him was the correct decision, in my opinion.
Had, in your silly example, Clarke won the league then there would be no debate.
by genome » 15 Mar 2016 14:47
genome I'm not going round in circles again. I've already shown you a few times in this thread that we have been showing signs of improvement which you have just ignored or just repeated your point.
I'm interested to know Kes, had Clarke not been a Chelsea lad, that you would really care otherwise?
by genome » 15 Mar 2016 14:54
by Maneki Neko » 15 Mar 2016 15:02
wingnut If Clarke hadn't wanted to speak to Fulham and completely soured his relationship with the club, there's no doubt he would've been given longer to turn the poor form around. That he wasn't is entirely his own fault.
genome Nice try, and nicely dodged.
That's like saying music is subjective so therefore the album that sold the most is the best one.
by Maneki Neko » 15 Mar 2016 16:08
by genome » 15 Mar 2016 16:13
No Fixed Abodegenome Nice try, and nicely dodged.
That's like saying music is subjective so therefore the album that sold the most is the best one.
Reaching number 2 has always been better than reaching number 11 in the charts.
genomeNo Fixed Abodegenome Nice try, and nicely dodged.
That's like saying music is subjective so therefore the album that sold the most is the best one.
Reaching number 2 has always been better than reaching number 11 in the charts.
Taking your Chelsea bias out of the equation if possible, do you think Clarke would've turned it round and got us promoted considering the sour atmosphere around the club following the Fulham saga?
by Extended-Phenotype » 15 Mar 2016 16:26
by genome » 15 Mar 2016 16:27
Extended-Phenotype Shouldn't SWP stil be playing at chelsea? Recent form not being important and that!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Polonia, Snowflake Royal and 201 guests