by jd82 »
16 Jan 2016 18:52
bcubed jd82
Was right in line with this
Unbelievably bad decision . It's exactly what that rule was bryought in for
No doubt we wouldn't have been able to break down ten men but at least we wouldn't have lost
Which rule (sic)? No matter how loud people shout "he's last man ref" that doesn't make it the actual rule
You could argue he was along way away from goal and heading further away. Which is clearly why the red thought yellow was enough.
The rule about denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity. What did you think I meant?!
Couldn't be clearer and how the hell was he heading further away from goal? He was running towards it![/quote]
The ball looked to be heading towards the corner. Maybe I'm the only other person apart from the ref who thought this, but it's what it looked like to me. Ftr, I still think it was a red card, but I can see why he hasn't given it. It becomes a much bigger call if you send someone off.
Incidentally thought they should have had at least another 2 bookings for foils very similar to the ones Gunts and HRk were booked for.
Possible quote shambles coming here