by Webster750 » 19 Mar 2023 12:16
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 20 Mar 2023 08:59
by ReadingGlasses » 20 Mar 2023 11:00
by Snowflake Royal » 20 Mar 2023 11:05
YorkshireRoyal99 P.Ince until the end of the season and then review from there. Similar to last season, regardless of who is in charge, we aren't going to be any better/worse off. We'd have stayed up under either Pauno/P.Ince last season, likewise whatever our fate this season, it would be no different whether it was P.Ince, Bowen, Gilkes etc.
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 20 Mar 2023 11:15
Snowflake RoyalYorkshireRoyal99 P.Ince until the end of the season and then review from there. Similar to last season, regardless of who is in charge, we aren't going to be any better/worse off. We'd have stayed up under either Pauno/P.Ince last season, likewise whatever our fate this season, it would be no different whether it was P.Ince, Bowen, Gilkes etc.
Now that's a bold claim with no supporting evidence.
by andrew1957 » 20 Mar 2023 11:52
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 20 Mar 2023 12:08
by Sanguine » 20 Mar 2023 12:09
by tidus_mi2 » 20 Mar 2023 12:18
Sanguine Our fortunes have very little to do with our manager. I didn't support sacking Paunovic, and I don't support sacking Ince. Our club is a shambles. We are looking nervously into the middle distance at bankruptcy. Every year we have to rebuild a thin squad with loan signings and picking up unattached players. Crowds are low, support is dismal. Bringing in another manager of the level that they would take on the task of trying to keep this club up is futile. We aren't going to stumble on a gem.
by Chairman Mao » 20 Mar 2023 12:28
by Snowflake Royal » 20 Mar 2023 12:34
YorkshireRoyal99Snowflake RoyalYorkshireRoyal99 P.Ince until the end of the season and then review from there. Similar to last season, regardless of who is in charge, we aren't going to be any better/worse off. We'd have stayed up under either Pauno/P.Ince last season, likewise whatever our fate this season, it would be no different whether it was P.Ince, Bowen, Gilkes etc.
Now that's a bold claim with no supporting evidence.
We drew with Peterborough and beat Preston in his last 2 games and I don't really give too much credit to Ince for our win at Birmingham, simply because he didn't have too much time to work with them. That was 7 points from 9 with an underperforming manager and then a manager with little chance to influence the side, which is kind of my point.
We'd have stayed up because we had better quality on the field than Peterborough and Barnsley and Derby were crippled by their points deduction, regardless of who was in charge.
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 20 Mar 2023 12:40
Snowflake RoyalYorkshireRoyal99Snowflake Royal Now that's a bold claim with no supporting evidence.
We drew with Peterborough and beat Preston in his last 2 games and I don't really give too much credit to Ince for our win at Birmingham, simply because he didn't have too much time to work with them. That was 7 points from 9 with an underperforming manager and then a manager with little chance to influence the side, which is kind of my point.
We'd have stayed up because we had better quality on the field than Peterborough and Barnsley and Derby were crippled by their points deduction, regardless of who was in charge.
Well I say our results improved because everyone knew Paunovic was going / were relieved he went.
Piss easy to make stuff up isn't it.
by Hound » 20 Mar 2023 12:45
YorkshireRoyal99Snowflake RoyalYorkshireRoyal99
We drew with Peterborough and beat Preston in his last 2 games and I don't really give too much credit to Ince for our win at Birmingham, simply because he didn't have too much time to work with them. That was 7 points from 9 with an underperforming manager and then a manager with little chance to influence the side, which is kind of my point.
We'd have stayed up because we had better quality on the field than Peterborough and Barnsley and Derby were crippled by their points deduction, regardless of who was in charge.
Well I say our results improved because everyone knew Paunovic was going / were relieved he went.
Piss easy to make stuff up isn't it.
Not really because you're just forming an opinion. You might say that, I might say differently, that's why this exists.
The point wasn't to do with who was/wasn't in charge, it was actually the opposite. It wouldn't have mattered who it was, be it Pauno, Ince or whoever else, we would have stayed up because we were better than 3 teams.
by URZZZZ » 20 Mar 2023 13:25
Sanguine Our fortunes have very little to do with our manager. I didn't support sacking Paunovic, and I don't support sacking Ince. Our club is a shambles. We are looking nervously into the middle distance at bankruptcy. Every year we have to rebuild a thin squad with loan signings and picking up unattached players. Crowds are low, support is dismal. Bringing in another manager of the level that they would take on the task of trying to keep this club up is futile. We aren't going to stumble on a gem.
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 20 Mar 2023 13:37
HoundYorkshireRoyal99Snowflake Royal Well I say our results improved because everyone knew Paunovic was going / were relieved he went.
Piss easy to make stuff up isn't it.
Not really because you're just forming an opinion. You might say that, I might say differently, that's why this exists.
The point wasn't to do with who was/wasn't in charge, it was actually the opposite. It wouldn't have mattered who it was, be it Pauno, Ince or whoever else, we would have stayed up because we were better than 3 teams.
Not sure Pauno can get much credit for that peterboro effort. We were absolutely absymal and should have lost to a team who hadn’t won for 20 games or something like that
by Hound » 20 Mar 2023 13:39
by RoyalBlue » 20 Mar 2023 13:41
Elm Park Kid No - If there's something PInce has proven himself in it's steering the club away from a relegation battle. We've got 8 games left and I would be far more confident with him in than any new manager.
To be blunt, we might not be able to afford to pay him off. I don't know what he's earning - but could easily be half a million right? We don't have that sort of money to throw about.
by Coppells Lost Coat » 20 Mar 2023 13:43
by Sanguine » 20 Mar 2023 15:25
URZZZZSanguine Our fortunes have very little to do with our manager. I didn't support sacking Paunovic, and I don't support sacking Ince. Our club is a shambles. We are looking nervously into the middle distance at bankruptcy. Every year we have to rebuild a thin squad with loan signings and picking up unattached players. Crowds are low, support is dismal. Bringing in another manager of the level that they would take on the task of trying to keep this club up is futile. We aren't going to stumble on a gem.
And why do you think crowds are so low? Cyclical effect isn’t it?
I don’t disagree with the notion that far too much blame is apportioned on the manager. But Ince is certainly a contributory factor to the current apathy and I think your comment of not going to stumble on a gem is a bit presumptuous
by Vision » 20 Mar 2023 15:40
HoundYorkshireRoyal99Snowflake Royal Well I say our results improved because everyone knew Paunovic was going / were relieved he went.
Piss easy to make stuff up isn't it.
Not really because you're just forming an opinion. You might say that, I might say differently, that's why this exists.
The point wasn't to do with who was/wasn't in charge, it was actually the opposite. It wouldn't have mattered who it was, be it Pauno, Ince or whoever else, we would have stayed up because we were better than 3 teams.
Not sure Pauno can get much credit for that peterboro effort. We were absolutely absymal and should have lost to a team who hadn’t won for 20 games or something like that
Users browsing this forum: Lower West and 278 guests