Elliott Didn't we lose Seol in a straight swap with Fulham for Rosinier? At the time we probably needed more defensive cover. Can't look back on it now and complain.
Who is Rosinier?

by Thaumagurist* » 26 May 2009 15:10
Elliott Didn't we lose Seol in a straight swap with Fulham for Rosinier? At the time we probably needed more defensive cover. Can't look back on it now and complain.
by Murts-is-Lej » 26 May 2009 15:11
Thaumagurist*Elliott Didn't we lose Seol in a straight swap with Fulham for Rosinier? At the time we probably needed more defensive cover. Can't look back on it now and complain.
Who is Rosinier?
by Thomas L'Heureux » 26 May 2009 15:38
TBMabellRoyal With Cheese Seol when he could be arsed > Seol when he couldn't be arsed > kebe.
Seol when he could be arsed > Kebe when he's on form (e.g. Norwich) > Seol when he couldn't be arsed > Kebe on a normal dayRoyal With Cheese Lock thread.
Why? Just so you can have the last say because you know you're right and no-one else's opinion matters?
Unlike most K-bashers here I think he has potential if we get the right manager to give him confidence to get his form back.
Kebe would be suited to play behind the strikers, in a free role. He's not a winger - just cos he has pace it doesn't make him a decent winger.
by Hoop Blah » 26 May 2009 15:40
Elliott Didn't we lose Seol in a straight swap with Fulham for Rosinier? At the time we probably needed more defensive cover. Can't look back on it now and complain.
by papereyes » 26 May 2009 15:43
by Ian Royal » 26 May 2009 15:57
by TBM » 26 May 2009 16:01
Thomas L'Heureux Why TBM?
He can't pass very well, and usually players in said role don't have pace, they just read the game well and have brilliant positional sense (Kebe doesn't exactly tick the boxes).
I don't usually diagree, but how did you come to the above conclusion?
Personally I think his best position would be running down the M4 as fast as he could.
by handbags_harris » 26 May 2009 16:37
by Thaumagurist* » 26 May 2009 16:40
handbags_harris I can't believe this is being debated at all. Seol > Kebe by a loooooooooooooooooooooong way. All those people who wanted Seol out are utterly clueless and pathetic, and all because he "didn't look interested". Stephen Hunt "looks interested", but I'll tell you what, give me Seol over Stephen Hunt any day of the week.
by Hoop Blah » 26 May 2009 16:49
by AbovetheI » 26 May 2009 17:35
by seahawk10 » 26 May 2009 17:44
by SLAMMED » 26 May 2009 19:23
by Royal With Cheese » 26 May 2009 19:24
by Pseud O'Nym » 26 May 2009 19:37
by rhroyal » 26 May 2009 20:36
by Forbury Lion » 26 May 2009 20:48
by SLAMMED » 26 May 2009 21:06
floyd__streete Only a simpleton would ever attempt to argue that Kebe is/was better than Seol.
I expect that SLAMMED will be along shortly.
by brendywendy » 28 May 2009 11:27
by roberto_11 » 28 May 2009 11:59
Forbury Lion If we've got shit wingers then play a right footed midfielder, Beckham seems to do okay there and looking back though rose tinted specs I'd say even Darren Caskey wasn't all that bad on wide right.
Users browsing this forum: Elm Park Old Boy, West F and 319 guests