by howser » 02 Aug 2009 22:38
by Royal Rother » 02 Aug 2009 22:53
by rg6royal » 02 Aug 2009 23:08
by Alan Partridge » 03 Aug 2009 07:37
Royal Rother Yet again we have this bollocks being spouted.
Tell me, what logical sense would it make for Madejski to prefer to remain in the Championship when promotion would most likely double the price he might expect for the club?
Of course he wants promotion but he is not going to jeopardise the long-term financial stability of the club by gambling its / his money to get there.
He has a risk management strategy in place that is designed to guarantee the club's future without him having to make further advances - but anyone who seriously doubts that he wants us to get back to the PL in the shortest possible time is a bit soft.
by papereyes » 03 Aug 2009 08:53
Wycombe Royal It's pre-season.
Who cares?
by Jimmy the Tree » 03 Aug 2009 09:15
by Royal Rother » 03 Aug 2009 09:16
by Alan Partridge » 03 Aug 2009 09:28
Royal Rother AP, I'm glad you agree with me about JM's desire to get the club into the PL.
But I must take issue you with you on your other point - if we were to get promoted, however much money Man City and others might choose to spend, it doesn't mean the quality of players in the PL would have gone up between our visits to the top table. Actually it is pretty clear at the moment that the very best players in the world are being "highjacked" by the Spanish League, so, if anything, the quality is slightly on the wane.
We didn't spend anything much last time (comparitively) yet made a great impression and stayed for 2 seasons - and, let's not forget, that was achieved with a squad populated by a significant number of pretty well-exposed lower league types, free transfers and relative unknowns. If they weren't the proverbial lambs there should at least be some cause for optimism if Rodgers' Babes proved good enough to gain promotion - because at least we could be pretty damned certain that they had more potential for improvement in them than Coppell's team had.
by CMRoyal » 03 Aug 2009 09:37
Alan PartridgeRoyal Rother AP, I'm glad you agree with me about JM's desire to get the club into the PL.
But I must take issue you with you on your other point - if we were to get promoted, however much money Man City and others might choose to spend, it doesn't mean the quality of players in the PL would have gone up between our visits to the top table. Actually it is pretty clear at the moment that the very best players in the world are being "highjacked" by the Spanish League, so, if anything, the quality is slightly on the wane.
We didn't spend anything much last time (comparitively) yet made a great impression and stayed for 2 seasons - and, let's not forget, that was achieved with a squad populated by a significant number of pretty well-exposed lower league types, free transfers and relative unknowns. If they weren't the proverbial lambs there should at least be some cause for optimism if Rodgers' Babes proved good enough to gain promotion - because at least we could be pretty damned certain that they had more potential for improvement in them than Coppell's team had.
Agree on the last point, however yes they were originally free transfers or fairly cheap players but they racked up 106 points and 2 defeats in 46 matches the season before. They were moulded into a team that had an unbelievable mentality who were all hitting their 'peak' years at the same time, I don't think the first season was that much of a shock although 8th was passed everyone's wildest expectations. The limitations came once the likes of Sidwell were leaving, maybe Shorey had his head turned and we never really had the clout to replace them. People say well we spent £2.5million on Fae, that's peanuts in the Premiership, it was also on a foreign player with no experience of the English league or lifestlye, brought in to replace someone of Sidwell's calibre. It needed a Gary O'Neil, we needed a Matt Taylor, these sort of guys, proven guys to come in and maintain Reading's status. It didn't happen then. I heavily doubt it'd happen now especially with what seems to be the financial constraints at the club.
The quality of players in the PL may well be on the wane but the fees aren't, we wouldn't compete even for the scraps of what the big clubs are spending. You see how much Hull are struggling to get players, Reading would be the same. Hull's fate in my opinion is practically already sealed at the moment. I must say a couple of season's steady progression with these youngsters would be far more beneficial long term on the pitch,than a Derby or a Watford type one off playoff winning season followed by a dismal relegation of which neither club has properly recovered.
The previous years near miss almost has to be forgotten for me, Rodgers team hopefully will be vibrant and energetic and hopefully will be schooled the right way, but they will make mistakes, the ywill be inconsistant and I just hope the supporters can understand that and are willing to be patient. Having said that if the team struggles this year it'd be interesting to see where the supporters would lay the balme, I don't mean on here but at the ground, would there be murmerings towards the management or board? I hope we don't get a chance to find out!
by Royal Rother » 03 Aug 2009 09:47
by Platypuss » 03 Aug 2009 09:50
Royal Rother Without having a billionaire Chairman prepared to risk / write off / underwrite the huge sums to compete in the transfer market, the best / likeliest / only? way of making real progress towards ultimate PL consolidation is to have a vibrant Academy that produces (relatively) cheap home grown players.
It is fantastic that we have made real progress towards that goal.
by Alan Partridge » 03 Aug 2009 09:59
Royal Rother Without having a billionaire Chairman prepared to risk / write off / underwrite the huge sums to compete in the transfer market, the best / likeliest / only? way of making real progress towards ultimate PL consolidation is to have a vibrant Academy that produces (relatively) cheap home grown players.
It is fantastic that we have made real progress towards that goal. And the fact that they are going to get a real chance to eatablish themselves as 1st team players this season (it would appear that way anyway) will only increase the attraction of our Academy. The long-term vision is really taking shape. Many supporters are only concerned with the here and now but thankfully the progress of the last 10 years has not been focused entirely on the existing 1st team squad of the day.
by Royal Rother » 03 Aug 2009 10:09
by Platypuss » 03 Aug 2009 10:10
Royal Rother I know Boro have always spent big on strikers but (although I appreciate a balance between experience and youth is sensible) spending £13m + wages on Afonso Alves and however much on Mido seemed unlikely to produce the right mix to go with their good youngsters.
by Alan Partridge » 03 Aug 2009 10:21
Royal Rother I know Boro have always spent big on strikers but (although I appreciate a balance between experience and youth is sensible) spending £13m + wages on Afonso Alves and however much on Mido seemed unlikely to produce the right mix to go with their good youngsters.
by PlasticRoyale » 03 Aug 2009 10:25
by Wizard » 03 Aug 2009 10:28
by One Beer is never enough. » 03 Aug 2009 10:36
Wizard The official site won't load at the moment - anyone know why? It was working 20 minutes ago
by papereyes » 03 Aug 2009 10:43
Alan PartridgeRoyal Rother I know Boro have always spent big on strikers but (although I appreciate a balance between experience and youth is sensible) spending £13m + wages on Afonso Alves and however much on Mido seemed unlikely to produce the right mix to go with their good youngsters.
I couldn't believe the Alves deal at the time, and it's just further proof of the shocking manager that Southgate is. Boro just sign unproven strikers for excessive money left right and centre. Peculiar as they don't do that anywhere else across the field.
Last season tho, they allowed an excellent proven keeper go and not replace him. Just use two young lads. They used youth constantly to cover their back 4, also their midfield and Tuncay apart had nothing up front. They were managed poorly by Southgate and whilst you have to admire Gibson's loyalty to his staff, Southgate should have been sacked last year.
by Royal Rother » 03 Aug 2009 10:49
PlatypussRoyal Rother I know Boro have always spent big on strikers but (although I appreciate a balance between experience and youth is sensible) spending £13m + wages on Afonso Alves and however much on Mido seemed unlikely to produce the right mix to go with their good youngsters.
Easy to say in hindsight, RR.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Keysfield and 181 guests