Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 19160
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Pepe the Horseman » 23 Feb 2016 22:51

Super save from El Habso in the first half. Would like to see their penalty appeal again.

User avatar
Steve_Upper_West
Member
Posts: 353
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 16:13
Location: Brighton and GU10

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Steve_Upper_West » 23 Feb 2016 22:53

Royal Ginger Whilst Mathematically not, realistically, any interest in this season beyond the cup is now fully over.


Whilst I am not disagreeing you say that as if we lost tonight....... "is now fully over" :?

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7415
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Royal Ginger » 23 Feb 2016 22:59

Steve_Upper_West
Royal Ginger Whilst Mathematically not, realistically, any interest in this season beyond the cup is now fully over.


Whilst I am not disagreeing you say that as if we lost tonight....... "is now fully over" :?


As in the competition involved in a relegation battle is now ALSO over.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Ian Royal » 23 Feb 2016 23:12

Make no mistake, that was not us turning a corner, we were poor Rovrum were awful.

We looked much better when Rakels came on for Norwood who was a bystander tonight. If he could stay on side it might have been more comfortable.

Still very little goal threat. We're a tight unit at the back but just isolated individual s going forward.

But a win is a win and in November we'd have lost.

Al-Habsi 8 top draw save first half
Gunter 6 very negative in possession
Obita 6 as above
McShane 7 solid
Cooper 7 solid
Hector 7 solid
Quinn 7 tireless workrate
Norwood 6 off the pace and not helped by the shape
HRK 8 MotM continues to threaten
John 7 threatened but isolated
Kermie 6 isolated and never looked like scoring

Rakels 7 quick, committed, needs to watch the line.
McCleary 6 not suited to the left, didn't do a lot on the right.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Ian Royal » 23 Feb 2016 23:17

50 points is generally the safe mark in the Chump, 55 to be certain. 40 is PL.


User avatar
John Madejski's Wallet
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 28029
Joined: 10 Apr 2005 00:22
Location: Anyone who lives within their means shows a serious lack of imagination

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by John Madejski's Wallet » 23 Feb 2016 23:25

Much as Hector was pretty awesome, I agree with the caller in to BBCBerks..... Brian playing a negative 451 with hector in middle is pulling the defence too deep and really isolating the attackers

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26486
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by genome » 23 Feb 2016 23:48

Hector was better than "solid" Ian. But I was confused how negative the formation was, Kermogant was very isolated. And John/HRK had three players on them when it went out wide.

We would have never conceded. Rotherham were dire. No surprise that when Rakels came on we had a decent sight at goal and scored with a very good finish.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Ian Royal » 23 Feb 2016 23:49

John Madejski's Wallet Much as Hector was pretty awesome, I agree with the caller in to BBCBerks..... Brian playing a negative 451 with hector in middle is pulling the defence too deep and really isolating the attackers

Acceptable while Williams is out as Piazon's too lightweight for midfield. Evans and Fernandez not really a solution either.

When Williams is back, Norwood can play deeper and Danny can link with attack.

I don't think Kermie is helping either, he's too static, not super speedy and encourages longer balls. Vydra's pace and movement may help.

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7415
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Royal Ginger » 24 Feb 2016 00:43

Ian Royal Evans and Fernandez not really a solution either.

Why not Evans? We've seen him in one game after next to no time with the squad. I don't feel we have sufficient information to make that judgement.


User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 19160
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Pepe the Horseman » 24 Feb 2016 06:59

Was super Matej Vydra injured again?

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 32351
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by leon » 24 Feb 2016 08:26

Ian Royal
John Madejski's Wallet Much as Hector was pretty awesome, I agree with the caller in to BBCBerks..... Brian playing a negative 451 with hector in middle is pulling the defence too deep and really isolating the attackers

Acceptable while Williams is out as Piazon's too lightweight for midfield. Evans and Fernandez not really a solution either.

When Williams is back, Norwood can play deeper and Danny can link with attack.

I don't think Kermie is helping either, he's too static, not super speedy and encourages longer balls. Vydra's pace and movement may help.

The bloke completely missed the point that with hector covering the defence Norwood didn't push up enough and link midfield with attack. He seemed lost.

There were a number of times in possession where he should have taken the ball forward, stretched Rotherham and played the ball. Or when he didn't have it, get into positions between their defence and midfield to receive it and then play it.
Very poor.

User avatar
Vision
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5219
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 20:53

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Vision » 24 Feb 2016 08:29

genome Hector was better than "solid" Ian. But I was confused how negative the formation was, Kermogant was very isolated. And John/HRK had three players on them when it went out wide.

We would have never conceded. Rotherham were dire. No surprise that when Rakels came on we had a decent sight at goal and scored with a very good finish.


I think a definite factor in selecting Hector was that we were conceding so many goals from set plays that were costing us points. That certainly appears to have been addressed by having that extra "centre half" in those situations

Of course there's an argument that says at home it may be overkill and we may need to be braver in the future but against teams managed by Pulis and Warnock you can see why he wouldn't change it.

EDIT. As leon says above, it's really the deployment and role of Norwood that is the issue. Whether it's instructions from McD who doesn't fully trust Hector to be on the ball as much as Norwood usually is, or if it's Norwood reverting to his "QB" comfort Zone I don't know but he really needs to be pushing forward in games like this. He's had a good season but he's become too predictable recently and it's made him and us much easier to deal with. He's capable of a lot more.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Ian Royal » 24 Feb 2016 10:25

Royal Ginger
Ian Royal Evans and Fernandez not really a solution either.

Why not Evans? We've seen him in one game after next to no time with the squad. I don't feel we have sufficient information to make that judgement.

He's supposedly more deep and defensive and didn't get forward much when we did see him


Esteban
Member
Posts: 919
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 16:09

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Esteban » 24 Feb 2016 10:34

John Madejski's Wallet Much as Hector was pretty awesome, I agree with the caller in to BBCBerks..... Brian playing a negative 451 with hector in middle is pulling the defence too deep and really isolating the attackers


It definitely wasn't a flat 451. I think it was supposed to be 4231, with Quinn in the number 10 role. However, Quinn kept dropping deep and so Kermorgant ended up isolated. Quinn was busy, but struggled to get into the game otherwise.

I thought Cox did a better job up front against better defenders than Kermorgant did last night. I reckon we'd have been more threatening if Cox had started instead of Quinn, but equally, we'd have had less strength in midfield.

Given Rotherham's spoiling tactics, our current injuries and winless run, I'll take the win. I think everyone knew what they were going to get from last night, which was reflected in the attendance figures. I enjoyed my half price pint, HRK's goal and the ref seemingly awarding us a free kick after he had run into Hector. Everything else I'm happy to forget.

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Maneki Neko » 24 Feb 2016 11:04

433

Longhorn1970
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1437
Joined: 17 Dec 2015 20:25

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Longhorn1970 » 24 Feb 2016 11:47

TBM
Libertine Right before the goal Rakels came on for Norwood and got the assist...


I thought it was Kermitthefrog?


Another dud, no composure when presented with a great chance from 12 yds

Longhorn1970
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1437
Joined: 17 Dec 2015 20:25

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Longhorn1970 » 24 Feb 2016 11:51

John Madejski's Wallet Much as Hector was pretty awesome, I agree with the caller in to BBCBerks..... Brian playing a negative 451 with hector in middle is pulling the defence too deep and really isolating the attackers


Perhaps the penny has finally dropped after McShane comments, and BM is trying to plug gaps, master tactician he is ..

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by Maneki Neko » 24 Feb 2016 12:09

:roll:

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 32351
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: Rotherham (H) Match thread - sponsored by Colin

by leon » 24 Feb 2016 12:16

Longhorn1970
John Madejski's Wallet Much as Hector was pretty awesome, I agree with the caller in to BBCBerks..... Brian playing a negative 451 with hector in middle is pulling the defence too deep and really isolating the attackers


Perhaps the penny has finally dropped after McShane comments, and BM is trying to plug gaps, master tactician he is ..


When Brian took us up to the Premier League you would have been in Reception or Year 1?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 308 guests

It is currently 16 Aug 2025 04:43