by Sarah Star » 15 Sep 2008 09:37
by brendywendy » 15 Sep 2008 10:06
by Wycombe Royal » 15 Sep 2008 10:13
by SpaceCruiser » 15 Sep 2008 10:14
Wycombe Royal Quite a few papers gave Harper the highest marks for any Reading player against Ipswich.
by thirtyyarder » 15 Sep 2008 13:14
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 15 Sep 2008 13:34
by Deathy » 15 Sep 2008 13:38
by Archie's penalty » 15 Sep 2008 13:45
by brendywendy » 15 Sep 2008 14:27
Deathy I demand Shane Long start tomorrow night. He should be the first name on the team sheet.
by Sarah Star » 15 Sep 2008 14:31
by brendywendy » 15 Sep 2008 14:59
Sarah Star Better he starts at home than away though, Brendy, but I know what you mean.
by phil in cornwall » 15 Sep 2008 15:07
Archie's penalty I am so glad I will be going to the game against Watford. I can see for myself how people are playing instead of reading the tripe on here...
by Alan Partridge » 15 Sep 2008 15:30
brendywendySarah Star Better he starts at home than away though, Brendy, but I know what you mean.
i would love the kid to score his own hattrick on tuesday and shut everyone up
but somethings wrong, his touch has gone completely, and that needs sorting, and i dont think it can be done just by playing him.
its good for long, but not for the team, and we need points at the mo, not a long spell of rubbish results in order to get long back on form.
by brendywendy » 15 Sep 2008 15:35
by T.R.O.L.I. » 15 Sep 2008 15:39
by Alan Partridge » 15 Sep 2008 15:41
brendywendy how has he been managed badly?
i think hes been fairly dealt with,
and local as he was, cox wasnt that great, long has scored goals at this, and prem level
etc
i know hes been shit recently, but his touch never used to be that bad!
by brendywendy » 15 Sep 2008 15:55
by chandog » 15 Sep 2008 15:59
Alan Partridgebrendywendy how has he been managed badly?
i think hes been fairly dealt with,
and local as he was, cox wasnt that great, long has scored goals at this, and prem level
etc
i know hes been shit recently, but his touch never used to be that bad!
Shane Long has 3 goals at Championship level, all against Derby.
simon Cox is well on course to hit over 20 in League 1, and he is younger than Long. He was never given a chance here, had he been given Long's chances or Lita's for that matter, I personally believe Cox would outscore both of them, in particiular Long.
Young player like Long need to play, we are seeing the consequence of a player having literally 1 or 2 games to cement a place in the first team and if he doesn't he'll go back to 10minute cameos. He is 21 now? Been here for 3 years and probably has less than 15 full games under his belt, as soon as Reading were promoted Long should have been out on loan for a season to a CCC club so he could continue his development properly. HE wasn't even remotely proven at CCC level and then he was 4th choice in the PRem for 2 years. It's not helping anyone.
Now we have him 3 years older with little or no more experience than 3 years ago and still with no questions answered.
What do we know about Cox? That he can score for fun in League 1 in a pretty poor side, when Cox leaves Swindon it will be for a hell of a lot more than £200,000.
It was shocking management with regards to both of them.
by CMRoyal » 15 Sep 2008 16:03
by chandog » 15 Sep 2008 16:07
CMRoyal Henry's playing for the Ressies today, right? Does that mean Hunt, N sub tomorrow again (ie cover for striker and RM positions)? I guess Hunt, S is effectively cover, with Convey LM cover. Certainly looks like Long will be in the 16 anyway, what with Mooney still being brought up to speed and Lita remaining out in the cold. So where are those changes coming from? The team looks like being same again only with Hunt, N and Long swapping places.
Users browsing this forum: Dirk Gently, Majestic-12 [Bot], Plymouth exile, Snowflake Royal and 325 guests