by handbags_harris »
09 Aug 2010 08:42
Royalee FiNeRaIn winchester_royal Both aren't good enough to start in a team which is supposed to be pushing for promotion.
Agreed, but id much rather gunnarson that karacan as he can actually pass, tackle and occasionally score. Karacan runs around like a healdess chicken, gives the ball away and nearly makes us concende ( that 4v1) and looks genuinely poor. The fact he was picked in front of tabb means either BMD is clueless or tabb was not fully fit.
How can you blame Karacan for the 4 on 1 when he gave the ball away on the edge of the opposition box? What absolute tosh, we should have been well-organised and left men back.
Well he's not entirely blameless seeing as it was his woeful first touch from a simple pass that gave the ball away in the first place. Your counter-argument is entirely valid, and it worries me that it happened twice last season against Bristol City and Preston, and now against Scunthorpe. We've been lucky so far that we haven't conceded from any by hook or by crook, keep doing it and we will.
My own opinion fwiw is that Gunnarsson is better than Karacan. Yes, Karacan is snappy and has legs, but he doesn't have the guile and knowhow of Gunnarsson. In short, I'm much more worried when we have Karacan in the side than Gunnarsson. I still don't understand why we played those two though, Tabb and Howard is a much better partnership IMO.