Harpers So Solid Crew We sure did SB, which just went to show that paying top dollar does not make a player play.
Just wondering how much we threw away
by Snowball » 30 Nov 2010 09:17
Harpers So Solid Crew We sure did SB, which just went to show that paying top dollar does not make a player play.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 30 Nov 2010 09:23
by brendywendy » 30 Nov 2010 10:15
Sir Rodger Doyle actually- the only promises JM made to me were delivered, in full, and then some
1:I think it’s more to do with the rhetoric we get when season tickets go on sale. The old classic “This reiterates my desire and determination to get this club back in the Premier league” bollox.[/color]
LOL at you taking risks with JMs money. risk your own why dont you
[color=#FF0000]2.As far as I can see, he hasn’t put a bean into the club since signing Leroy Lita. I, on the other hand have spent something like £5000 with the club in this time. While I accept that it is my choice to do so, I feel let down by his empty promises. On a positive note my eldest boy is becoming increasingly apathetic about going to matches at the moment, so it seems I may not have to pay out for one season ticket at least. The money I spend on the club will not be returned to when it is sold. So, I am risking my money while he is not risking his.
im not apologising for him- he doesnt need apologising for- apart from in the deranged minds of mongs
3.I don’t need apologies, just the truth would do.
your moronic use of the 'black hole every year' just shows how much of a mong you are. it doesnt come from nowhere each year purely as an excuse for him not to spend. we bring in less than we spent. as long as that happens(and weve gone a huge way in reducing wages to make sure it doesnt any more), and as long as companys have annual accounts there will always be a gap, every year. no need to get all conspiracy theory about it.
4.There is of course a disparity between revenue and costs. This is common to nearly all clubs in this country. The time when clubs could borrow money to meet deficits may be over, but the clubs already carrying these debts are fine so long as they can service them to the satisfaction of the creditor. We, as far as I know do not owe money to anyone. This may be fine for those who are financially responsible for the business, but it does make it very much harder for us to compete at this level. 4a. If JM cannot/will not invest money in the club then fine, I just wish he would come out and tell us. If we are to exist solely on the money we can generate as a business then I would rather yo-yo between the championship and league one, rather than shuffle around the middle of the Championship like an undead Zombie club. Every time we have a couple of players that are worth watching they are assets to the club on and off the field. I want to see players that get me out of my seat, players that can entertain and get us the results we all crave. If the future model of the club involves the selling of these assets in order to maintain JM’s position as the chairman, then I think the sooner he sells the better. 4.bDoes anyone here really want the spectre of a mid-table groundhog season year on year?
LOL at you for thinking that "club modelling themselves on arsenal, and having the aim of wanting to be as big as arsenal"="club thinking they are as big as arsenal
5.Sorry, don’t really understand this bit. Howe did say something along these lines, but I think you would be as deluded (as he clearly was when he said it) if you took it literally.
by brendywendy » 30 Nov 2010 10:18
RoyalBlueSir Rodger Doyle actually- the only promises JM made to me were delivered, in full, and then some
I think it’s more to do with the rhetoric we get when season tickets go on sale. The old classic “This reiterates my desire and determination to get this club back in the Premier league” bollox.
LOL at you taking risks with JMs money. risk your own why dont you
As far as I can see, he hasn’t put a bean into the club since signing Leroy Lita. I, on the other hand have spent something like £5000 with the club in this time. While I accept that it is my choice to do so, I feel let down by his empty promises. On a positive note my eldest boy is becoming increasingly apathetic about going to matches at the moment, so it seems I may not have to pay out for one season ticket at least. The money I spend on the club will not be returned to when it is sold. So, I am risking my money while he is not risking his.
im not apologising for him- he doesnt need apologising for- apart from in the deranged minds of mongs
I don’t need apologies, just the truth would do.
your moronic use of the 'black hole every year' just shows how much of a mong you are. it doesnt come from nowhere each year purely as an excuse for him not to spend. we bring in less than we spent. as long as that happens(and weve gone a huge way in reducing wages to make sure it doesnt any more), and as long as companys have annual accounts there will always be a gap, every year. no need to get all conspiracy theory about it.
There is of course a disparity between revenue and costs. This is common to nearly all clubs in this country. The time when clubs could borrow money to meet deficits may be over, but the clubs already carrying these debts are fine so long as they can service them to the satisfaction of the creditor. We, as far as I know do not owe money to anyone. This may be fine for those who are financially responsible for the business, but it does make it very much harder for us to compete at this level. If JM cannot/will not invest money in the club then fine, I just wish he would come out and tell us. If we are to exist solely on the money we can generate as a business then I would rather yo-yo between the championship and league one, rather than shuffle around the middle of the Championship like an undead Zombie club. Every time we have a couple of players that are worth watching they are assets to the club on and off the field. I want to see players that get me out of my seat, players that can entertain and get us the results we all crave. If the future model of the club involves the selling of these assets in order to maintain JM’s position as the chairman, then I think the sooner he sells the better. Does anyone here really want the spectre of a mid-table groundhog season year on year?
LOL at you for thinking that "club modelling themselves on arsenal, and having the aim of wanting to be as big as arsenal"="club thinking they are as big as arsenal
Sorry, don’t really understand this bit. Howe did say something along these lines, but I think you would be as deluded (as he clearly was when he said it) if you took it literally.
SRD, you answer Brendy Wendy very well for me. Mind you, not that difficult when his arguments descend to calling anyone who dare challenge ‘Sir’ Madejski’s words and approaches. As we are dishing out the word mong, I would suggest that label best rests with yourself Brendy Wendy. Just how much exposure have you had to high levels of business, investors, banks etc? I would hazard a guess - and that is why you swallow everything you are fed. I would have thought ‘black hole’ is a very appropriate term given that to many a blackhole is something mysterious and which they struggle to understand. For years Madejski and his men fed us lines about how brilliantly run the club was and how financially secure. Yet despite that, they suddenly have to sell off our best players and reinvest virtually sod all of the proceeds. Still never mind, we are assured that has put this incredibly well run club on a sound footing for the future. Then guess what, season after season the same thing happens! Meanwhile Madejski continues to spout shyte about PL ambitions!! whilst showing about as action and ability in achieving that as fulfilling his stated desire to sell the club.
Of course, it is all the nasty bank’s fault for unexpectedly asking for its money back! Now I wonder why they did that. Could it have something to do with the fact that a certain individual who had become seen as the king pin of the club, very actively involved in the management with just a very small board and prepared to invest some of his own money, suddenly announces to the whole world that he wants out and stops investing/putting his own money at risk? Little wonder other investors grabbed their money and ran for the hills!!
And as other clubs continue to survive financial disaster and/or change ownership, our own chairman still can’t manage to sell his secure and incredibly well run club. Could that have as much to do with the individual as our rise to the PL?
Of course, it is all the nasty bank’s fault for unexpectedly asking for its money back! Now I wonder why they did that. Could it have something to do with the fact that a certain individual who had become seen as the king pin of the club, very actively involved in the management with just a very small board and prepared to invest some of his own money, suddenly announces to the whole world that he wants out and stops investing/putting his own money at risk? Little wonder other investors grabbed their money and ran for the hills!!
by Millsy » 30 Nov 2010 22:31
by Sir Rodger Doyle » 30 Nov 2010 22:54
by prostak » 01 Dec 2010 00:39
2 world wars, 1 world cup The sheer stupidity of the Rectum Crew amuses me.
You are all thick b*stards.
The end.
by brendywendy » 01 Dec 2010 10:20
I have just looked at myself and don’t understand how my perceived inability to understand the machinations of the media would preclude me from forming a view on the current state of my football club. How should the ambition and determination of a football club owner manifest itself, if it is not financial?
I did say that “you pays your money and takes your choice” but this is done against a background of positive but erroneous information regarding the prospective fortunes of the club. To say he gets nothing for bailing us out is frankly absurd. I wonder if someone knows how much the total investment by JM is worth compared to a conservative value on the club. I applaud the man for saving my club, but I am also entitled to question his running of it.
Well, there was the whole increase in season ticket costs. This, I think we were told at the time that it would fund the signings we required to stay up.
How would he reduce the debt to himself? When did we ever have a debt to the bank? Why would he sell the club anyway when he can just sell the decent players we have to cover any operating loss? I feel that if he genuinely wanted to sell the club, he’d have done it by now. It seems convenient to me that he can absolve himself from any calls for financial investment by re-iterating his public desire to sell.
by Snowball » 01 Dec 2010 10:47
by specialjon » 01 Dec 2010 11:45
Snowball One thing we should all realise is that McDermott and Mr Maj had
three pieces of good fortune = three big surprises
The amount of money for Sigg was, I suspect, a nice surprise, plus how it's come, ie: a fair bit up front.
On top of that we got that new striker Irish striker from Dundee or somewhere, and that very solid full-back, Stretch.
My guess is, for genuine, honest, prudent reasons, we have been waiting to see how good Hunt will be after his op
and we have very useful cover for Harte (IF Stretch's legs can take it) or Harte's replacement.
I know the usual knee-jerkers will leap on this post, but I seriously believe McDermott has a plan
and has been waiting to settle the side and seriously look at his options.
He's trying Leighterwood now to either sign him in January or try someone else
(also gives Tabb more recovery and strengthening time) and no doubt he's looking
for a fourth striker. As the Long-haters keep saying, a No 1 striker brought into
this squad and we should be top six.
I still feel optimistic that we'll be challenging for 4th-5th-6th, and that's more than good enough this season
by brendywendy » 01 Dec 2010 12:24
2 world wars, 1 world cup The sheer stupidity of the Rectum Crew amuses me.
You are all thick b*stards.
The end.
by Ian Royal » 01 Dec 2010 16:27
2 world wars, 1 world cup The sheer stupidity of the Rectum Crew amuses me.
You are all thick b*stards.
The end.
by Wimb » 01 Dec 2010 16:36
Ian Royal2 world wars, 1 world cup The sheer stupidity of the Rectum Crew amuses me.
You are all thick b*stards.
The end.
Really? The total inability to rationally deal with facts and instead go off on paranoic rants with little foundation in reality amuses me about the Madejski conspiracy theory crew.
by Millsy » 04 Dec 2010 18:32
Ian Royal2 world wars, 1 world cup The sheer stupidity of the Rectum Crew amuses me.
You are all thick b*stards.
The end.
Really? The total inability to rationally deal with facts and instead go off on paranoic rants with little foundation in reality amuses me about the Madejski conspiracy theory crew.
by FiNeRaIn » 04 Dec 2010 18:35
by Row Z Royal » 04 Dec 2010 18:37
FiNeRaIn I agree Ian, the facts are we've received the highest amount of outgoing players sales in the football league the last 3 years, on top of half of the premierleague as well. Out of that money we have invested absolutely diddly squat of it back on the team. That;s fact.
Reading FC...the only club being run like we are in administration, when we actually aren't.
by FiNeRaIn » 04 Dec 2010 18:41
by Ian Royal » 04 Dec 2010 18:41
by Millsy » 04 Dec 2010 18:42
FiNeRaIn I agree Ian, the facts are we've received the highest amount of outgoing players sales in the football league the last 3 years, on top of half of the premierleague as well. Out of that money we have invested absolutely diddly squat of it back on the team. That;s fact.
Reading FC...the only club being run like we are in administration, when we actually aren't.
by Ian Royal » 04 Dec 2010 18:43
2 world wars, 1 world cupFiNeRaIn I agree Ian, the facts are we've received the highest amount of outgoing players sales in the football league the last 3 years, on top of half of the premierleague as well. Out of that money we have invested absolutely diddly squat of it back on the team. That;s fact.
Reading FC...the only club being run like we are in administration, when we actually aren't.
Which is why anyone who can't see it is quiet simply a THICK B*STARD. I normally don't stoop so low as to use insults like this (unlike almosts every member of the Rectum Crew) but it is a plain and simple matter of intellect. It is so simple, and TCR have been so comprehensively beaten in every debate I will not dignify the discussion any further.
Users browsing this forum: RG30, Royals and Racers, Silver Fox, Snowflake Royal and 180 guests