Brogue Joao back thank god
Reckon he’s not actually fit enough to play, least that’s what PI will say after 90 minutes and no subs used.
by Sutekh » 17 Aug 2022 19:27
Brogue Joao back thank god
by Snowflake Royal » 17 Aug 2022 19:27
by Snowflake Royal » 17 Aug 2022 19:28
SutekhBrogue Joao back thank god
Reckon he’s not actually fit enough to play, least that’s what PI will say after 90 minutes and no subs used.
by Mid Sussex Royal » 17 Aug 2022 19:29
Brogue Right I thought the Sarr deal wasn’t over the line because of financial reasons. We needed Puscas wages off the books. No, Dellor just said it’s because of the squad size, we are only allowed 25. And we are at 25 already. So it’s very much much one in one out then. So not sure how this premier league left back we’ve been touted as being interested in works then.
by Mid Sussex Royal » 17 Aug 2022 19:29
by Sutekh » 17 Aug 2022 19:30
Brogue Right I thought the Sarr deal wasn’t over the line because of financial reasons. We needed Puscas wages off the books. No, Dellor just said it’s because of the squad size, we are only allowed 25. And we are at 25 already. So it’s very much much one in one out then. So not sure how this premier league left back we’ve been touted as being interested in works then.
by Brogue » 17 Aug 2022 19:31
Mid Sussex RoyalBrogue Right I thought the Sarr deal wasn’t over the line because of financial reasons. We needed Puscas wages off the books. No, Dellor just said it’s because of the squad size, we are only allowed 25. And we are at 25 already. So it’s very much much one in one out then. So not sure how this premier league left back we’ve been touted as being interested in works then.
Doesn't make sense. Does that include Moore? he's not even got a squad number
by blythspartan » 17 Aug 2022 19:38
BrogueMid Sussex RoyalBrogue Right I thought the Sarr deal wasn’t over the line because of financial reasons. We needed Puscas wages off the books. No, Dellor just said it’s because of the squad size, we are only allowed 25. And we are at 25 already. So it’s very much much one in one out then. So not sure how this premier league left back we’ve been touted as being interested in works then.
Doesn't make sense. Does that include Moore? he's not even got a squad number
Well this is dellor, so who knows, but that is what he said
by Brogue » 17 Aug 2022 19:39
SutekhBrogue Right I thought the Sarr deal wasn’t over the line because of financial reasons. We needed Puscas wages off the books. No, Dellor just said it’s because of the squad size, we are only allowed 25. And we are at 25 already. So it’s very much much one in one out then. So not sure how this premier league left back we’ve been touted as being interested in works then.
What criteria qualifies a player as being one of the 25, a lot of Reading’s youth have barely had any league game time.
by JR » 17 Aug 2022 19:42
Brogue Right I thought the Sarr deal wasn’t over the line because of financial reasons. We needed Puscas wages off the books. No, Dellor just said it’s because of the squad size, we are only allowed 25. And we are at 25 already. So it’s very much much one in one out then. So not sure how this premier league left back we’ve been touted as being interested in works then.
by Snowflake Royal » 17 Aug 2022 19:53
BrogueSutekhBrogue Right I thought the Sarr deal wasn’t over the line because of financial reasons. We needed Puscas wages off the books. No, Dellor just said it’s because of the squad size, we are only allowed 25. And we are at 25 already. So it’s very much much one in one out then. So not sure how this premier league left back we’ve been touted as being interested in works then.
What criteria qualifies a player as being one of the 25, a lot of Reading’s youth have barely had any league game time.
Actually it seems it’s 24 players. The efl website says
‘Under what circumstances can a Club operating under an Embargo sign players?
During a Transfer Window
Clubs can ‘staff up’, so they have 23 players of Professional Standing within their squad.’
‘Professional Standing = is any Player who has made one first team appearance (including as a sub) for any Club in any first team competition (EFL Trophy appearances do not count).’
‘Established Player (Championship Clubs) - A player aged 21 or over as at the 30 June immediately prior to the commencement of the season in which the Club is subject to the Embargo and who has been named in the starting XI on a total of at least five occasions*.
*in EFL League, EFL Cup, EFL Trophy, FA Cup or equivalent competitions for any Club in any equivalent League to the Championship or higher.
How is the number of players these Clubs can acquire managed?
If the Club has 24 or more Established Players they can only sign new players on a one in one out basis, though this will be dependent upon the circumstances of the individual Club and will be determined by the League.
Where a Club has less than 24 Established Players they can register players up to the 24 limit, though again this will be dependent upon the circumstances of the individual Club and will be determined by the League.’
https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/em ... goes-faqs/
by Brogue » 17 Aug 2022 19:54
by Rax » 17 Aug 2022 19:55
by Brogue » 17 Aug 2022 19:59
by Snowflake Royal » 17 Aug 2022 19:59
Brogue Starting with a flat back 4, thank god.
by Snowflake Royal » 17 Aug 2022 20:05
by Brogue » 17 Aug 2022 20:10
by Snowflake Royal » 17 Aug 2022 20:11
Brogue We have passed the 10 Minutes mark, woohoo!!
by Brogue » 17 Aug 2022 20:13
by Snowflake Royal » 17 Aug 2022 20:14
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Mid Sussex Royal, windermereROYAL and 266 guests