by rhroyal » 28 Aug 2011 11:24
by Ian Royal » 28 Aug 2011 11:38
by readingbedding » 28 Aug 2011 11:59
by manny96 » 28 Aug 2011 12:17
Avon Royalmanny96 So, Long and Mills? But we didn't get promotion last year, what guarantees this year? .
Nothing "guarantees" anything. That seems to be the standard argument against any kind of challenge to the club's actions. Keeping players doesn't guarantee promotions, buying players doesn't guarentee promotion, hell, selling players doesn't guarantee relegation. However, actions do have consequences that impact the probability of specific outcomes. If we are saying that the board should only back the players if they can "guarentee" promotion then we all might as well give up and go home. Sometimes you have to take a chance, a venture, a risk in order to achieve your goals. A bit of vision and ambition is all anyone is asking for.
by Handsome Man » 28 Aug 2011 12:28
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Aug 2011 12:37
by Friday's Legacy » 28 Aug 2011 12:38
PEARCEY I'm no lover of SJM but we have just made three new signings and at a significant cost. One more may still yet come in. McDermott has done very well to date and this is his first bad run. It was bound to happen at some stage. We lost Mills but have bought in Gorkss so I don't see us as weaker there. Can Le Fondre fill Shane Long's boots? If he can we will be in the hunt for promotion.
Its still August and early days. If we only pick up 4 points from our next 5 games then I will be worried...but I think we will do a lot better than that.
by Ian Royal » 28 Aug 2011 12:43
by rhroyal » 28 Aug 2011 12:47
by leww_rfc » 28 Aug 2011 13:06
by Turns8 » 28 Aug 2011 15:00
by RoyalBlue » 28 Aug 2011 16:43
manny96Avon Royalmanny96 So, Long and Mills? But we didn't get promotion last year, what guarantees this year? .
Nothing "guarantees" anything. That seems to be the standard argument against any kind of challenge to the club's actions. Keeping players doesn't guarantee promotions, buying players doesn't guarentee promotion, hell, selling players doesn't guarantee relegation. However, actions do have consequences that impact the probability of specific outcomes. If we are saying that the board should only back the players if they can "guarentee" promotion then we all might as well give up and go home. Sometimes you have to take a chance, a venture, a risk in order to achieve your goals. A bit of vision and ambition is all anyone is asking for.
Agreed, it doesn't guarantee anything. Yet now we have made a calculated investment, without holding any players back from fulfilling their own 'ambition'. Risk-taking is necessary, without a doubt, but I'm still not quite sure what more risks would be so worthwhile, given the information available we have now.
On another note, I've had enough of the 'where's your business model now'? school of thought. Reading FC is not a well-run business, it is a financially well-run football club. Well-run businesses don't have to sell off their best assets but, in our case, a well-run football club does. A deficit is a consequence of the fact that football clubs are not profit-making entities, especially with the perverse and contradictory logics of supporter expectation and capital.
by manny96 » 28 Aug 2011 17:08
RoyalBlue That latter point may well be correct. However, it was Madejski, his sidekicks and disciples who kept telling us that RFC is a business and had to be run like any other business (that was a line frequently used to justify some of the less palatable decisions/actions). It was also them who kept assuring us that it was a very well run business.
by SpaceCruiser » 28 Aug 2011 17:56
blueroyals are people seriously questioning McDermott
by Plymouth_Royal » 28 Aug 2011 18:34
by Wycombe Royal » 28 Aug 2011 18:38
retro royal I do question though his signings, majority over 30
by Archie's penalty » 28 Aug 2011 22:20
by Pseud O'Nym » 28 Aug 2011 22:40
Archie's penalty Gorkks, MIlls, ALfie are all 35.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 28 Aug 2011 23:04
Plymouth_Royal Maccy D needs to stop the team playing hoofball. This is reminding me of Coppell too much. We got found out second season in the prem as we just hoofed it with no plan b. This season we're just doing the same. Hoofing it get it to a winger and then getting them to do something with the ball. He needs to change the way we play slightly and then I'm sure we will see a turn around in results.
by SpaceCruiser » 28 Aug 2011 23:09
Rev Algenon Stickleback H We hardly got "found out" in the premier. We played old fashioned 4-4-2
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where? and 673 guests