by Divvy » 09 Apr 2013 10:53
by melonhead » 09 Apr 2013 11:05
by Divvy » 09 Apr 2013 11:07
melonhead no they didnt.
by Jay o/ » 09 Apr 2013 11:11
by melonhead » 09 Apr 2013 11:13
by Wipped » 09 Apr 2013 11:14
by melonhead » 09 Apr 2013 11:16
Wipped Didn't we only make a small loss of say £3m? That's very well managed at a very competitive level. Certainly gives me confidence with next season in mind. It should be easier to get our targets this time, rather than consistently lose out..
by Ouroboros » 09 Apr 2013 11:33
Divvymelonhead no they didnt.
Actually, many of them did argue that. This also suggests we over-pay for some very average players.
by Vision » 09 Apr 2013 11:36
by TBM » 09 Apr 2013 15:25
OuroborosDivvymelonhead no they didnt.
Actually, many of them did argue that. This also suggests we over-pay for some very average players.
We won the league
by SCIAG » 09 Apr 2013 15:43
Divvymelonhead no they didnt.
Actually, many of them did argue that. This also suggests we over-pay for some very average players.
by Ian Royal » 09 Apr 2013 16:12
Vision Surely a fair chunk of that will be bonuses from actual promotion though. It's pretty telling that 3 of the top 4 were the promoted teams which suggests that the table is pretty skewered in favour of bonuses.
by Snowball » 09 Apr 2013 16:15
by SydenhamRoyal » 09 Apr 2013 16:37
Snowball So wouldn't separation of basic wages/bonuses be more revealing?
by Wipped » 09 Apr 2013 16:50
melonheadWipped Didn't we only make a small loss of say £3m? That's very well managed at a very competitive level. Certainly gives me confidence with next season in mind. It should be easier to get our targets this time, rather than consistently lose out..
it was consistently around 5 + million in the championship. even with parachute payments
when JMs money dried up we had to make that up by selling players, but it was agrred that this was abetter prospect than trying to reduce the wage bill further
OuroborosDivvymelonhead no they didnt.
Actually, many of them did argue that. This also suggests we over-pay for some very average players.
We won the league
by Ouroboros » 09 Apr 2013 17:05
WippedOuroboros We won the league
without that promotion, would you say they were worth the 4th highest wage bill in that league? i wouldn't. maybe 7th or 8th. personal opinion tho.
by Ian Royal » 09 Apr 2013 17:13
SCIAGDivvymelonhead no they didnt.
Actually, many of them did argue that. This also suggests we over-pay for some very average players.
No, I don't think they did.
And we won the league.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 09 Apr 2013 18:21
by MouldyRoyal » 09 Apr 2013 18:52
by Royalee » 09 Apr 2013 20:02
Divvy @ReadingFC__News
Championship top wages WHU £42m, Soton £29m, Leicester £28m, Reading £27m, Birmingham £25m, Boro £22m. pic.twitter.com/dB4YfSm0dm #readingfc
That's a very competitive wage bill for the Championship! It'll be even higher next season.
And the BM fans always claimed we had one of the lowest wage budgets in the Championship...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 597 guests