by sandman »
24 Aug 2013 19:34
MmmMonsterMunch sandman MmmMonsterMunch Surely we can all at least agree that Reading needed to be better on the ball and get more possession though?
I'm not saying we need to be Barcelona but the ball was in the main a hot potato under McDermott.
(That is not a dig at McD before you interpret it to be Sandman). Whether you play direct or more of a passing game we were way below par when it came to retaining the ball.
Good means you're are maturing and at least learning something.
All I've learnt is that you're patronising to be honest - not once have I had a dig at McD.
Again you're seeing things that aren't there. I'm not trying to patronise you but if you don't seem to understand or want to understand what is being said.
This little spat all came about because I made a perfectly reasonable point that while there was overreaction to today's result those like yourself who seemingly want to pretend nothing is going wrong at all are also wrong. That would seem perfectly fine to a reasonable person but you decided to go on the attack and make remarks about me based on your pre-conceived idea's and go on about being a glass half full person.
Questioning things does not make someone a negative person and if you want the hippy everyone's great and the world is a brilliant place win, lose or draw then I suggest RR may be more to your taste.
Last edited by
sandman on 24 Aug 2013 19:54, edited 3 times in total.