by marcusopp » 27 Dec 2013 16:50
by sandman » 27 Dec 2013 16:54
by Platypuss » 27 Dec 2013 16:58
by marcusopp » 27 Dec 2013 17:03
Platypuss Brian wasn't given enough time - he should never have been sacked.
Sack Adkins - he's had enough time.
Does that cover it?
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
by Handsome Man » 27 Dec 2013 17:04
marcusopp With painfully poor performances, a terrible sun tan and a much better squad than McD had throughout his reign it's made me reflect on the good times under McDermott.
We played a direct style because that's what we had the playing staff to do. But under McD, 1 nil down with 5 minutes to go, you knew there was going to be a big finish and never felt like we were out of it (in the Championship at least).
The squad was a proper squad, with no (apparent) egos 'til Pog and Guthrie arrived.
And we had Kebe!
by SPARTA » 27 Dec 2013 17:04
by sandman » 27 Dec 2013 17:06
by CountryRoyal » 27 Dec 2013 17:13
by Mr Angry » 27 Dec 2013 17:14
by CountryRoyal » 27 Dec 2013 17:15
sandman Brian should never have been sacked, the amount of "time" he had is irrelevant. If you want to talk about something relevant then he wasn't given enough money, by an owner who we now know didn't have any, in order to get a team ready for the PL.
Adkins doesn't have the right personality to fit the club and shouldn't have been brought in in the first place.
by marcusopp » 27 Dec 2013 17:15
sandman Brian should never have been sacked, the amount of "time" he had is irrelevant. If you want to talk about something relevant then he wasn't given enough money, by an owner who we now know didn't have any, in order to get a team ready for the PL.
Adkins doesn't have the right personality to fit the club and shouldn't have been brought in in the first place.
by Caversham Royal » 27 Dec 2013 17:16
by MmmMonsterMunch » 27 Dec 2013 17:20
by LoyalRoyalFan » 27 Dec 2013 17:25
sandman Brian should never have been sacked, the amount of "time" he had is irrelevant. If you want to talk about something relevant then he wasn't given enough money, by an owner who we now know didn't have any, in order to get a team ready for the PL.
Adkins doesn't have the right personality to fit the club and shouldn't have been brought in in the first place.
by SPARTA » 27 Dec 2013 17:28
sandman Adkins doesn't have the right personality to fit the club and shouldn't have been brought in in the first place.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 27 Dec 2013 17:34
by MmmMonsterMunch » 27 Dec 2013 17:37
LoyalRoyalFan Brian could relate to the fans, not only was he a decent manager (as proven by Leeds being ahead of us in the table no less) but the fans loved him.
Those who wanted him sacked last season have been taught a lesson, and we're laughing because they have been proved WRONG.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 27 Dec 2013 17:42
MmmMonsterMunchLoyalRoyalFan Brian could relate to the fans, not only was he a decent manager (as proven by Leeds being ahead of us in the table no less) but the fans loved him.
Those who wanted him sacked last season have been taught a lesson, and we're laughing because they have been proved WRONG.
Laughing at the fact Reading are doing badly. Well done you.
Moron
Perhaps you should consider a change of username?
by Cureton's Volley » 27 Dec 2013 18:49
by jellytot » 27 Dec 2013 18:49
Caversham Royal Mark McGhee
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998 and 164 guests