Brain TraysersSilver Foxgenome Paddy Power:
Would be good if these people actually did some research
So actual goals improved but xG didn't? I know which one I'll take thanks ya bunch of nerds
I'm confused by these takes - PP literally reference their reasoning for their view.
Secondly, xG has been shown to far better explain/predict future results than previous results has. That's a justifiable red flag to people who care about that - NTT20 in this case. You could of course take the view that because we have over-performed xG for what feels like forever, we will continue to do so, but then again 9 tails in a row doesn't mean we won't see heads next flip.
(Of course you are all equally entitled to not care in the slightest about it)
Isn’t the bit people find weird the claim that ‘performances didn’t improve’. They did, unarguably.