by JimmytheJim »
28 Dec 2019 14:49
NewCorkSeth st george NewCorkSeth I agree with Ian. A goalkeeper getting the positioning correct does not equal a great save.
Then that would make you both incorrect. I presume neither of you have ever played in goal. How many defenders have you seen turn theirs backs to block a shot? A fair few I would imagine. A goalkeeper makes himself big and throws his body in front of the ball and it hits him in the face. If it hits him in the chest it is a good save ? Why is it lucky to hit him in the face? His positioning and technique were excellent.
The reason I agree with Ian is the use of the word great. There is nothing great about it. Call it a decent save. Or an important save. Fine.
He got the positioning right. That's the minimum you should expect from a goalkeeper. Jesus, the ones who dont get the positioning right dont play where possible. Praising Rafael for "being in the right position" is like praising a winger for a perfect cross into the box when nobody is actually in the box.
If a striker is fed a perfect head height cross, they make all the correct runs to meet it but instead of actually heading it, it bounces off their chin and goes in that is not a great goal. The fact he got everything else right doesnt elevate it.
With the greatest respect, you're talking out of your arse.
Great saves can be made with any part. His positioning was excellent. 9 times out of 10 that volley bulges the onion bag, but Rafael covered the ground, spread himself and saved us three points.
Your comparison with a winger playing a good cross that nobody gets on the end of is nonsense. A better comparison would be a striker scoring unconventionally, perhaps by sticking out his bum to deflect the ball past the keeper.