by windermereROYAL » 18 Jan 2020 18:30
by URZZZZ » 18 Jan 2020 18:31
windermereROYAL Reading fans in a nutshell. bad day at the office, wouldn`t travel to that shithole if I was paid to,
by tidus_mi2 » 18 Jan 2020 18:34
by Zip » 18 Jan 2020 19:33
by windermereROYAL » 18 Jan 2020 19:44
Zip Where do we go with Puscas? Is he going to be good enough to produce the goods consistently at this level?
by URZZZZ » 18 Jan 2020 21:41
Zip Where do we go with Puscas? Is he going to be good enough to produce the goods consistently at this level?
by Hound » 18 Jan 2020 21:52
by windermereROYAL » 18 Jan 2020 21:58
by Snowflake Royal » 18 Jan 2020 22:41
Zip Where do we go with Puscas? Is he going to be good enough to produce the goods consistently at this level?
by URZZZZ » 18 Jan 2020 22:41
windermereROYAL Still the top scorer, doesn`t say too much about the others does it? but because he`s come in with big expectations he`s getting most of the flak.
by Zip » 18 Jan 2020 23:43
windermereROYALZip Where do we go with Puscas? Is he going to be good enough to produce the goods consistently at this level?
He got half hour on the pitch so lets have a go at him rather than the misfiring forwards from the previous hour. Baldock puts in a good shift but he`s hardly prolific. is he?
by muirinho » 19 Jan 2020 15:52
URZZZZ
But we were always going to lose at some point and as I pointed out after the Fulham game, the best measure of the potential of this team is the reaction to a loss/couple of losses. We don't want a 14/15 or 15/16 type end where we just drift away
by Snowflake Royal » 19 Jan 2020 16:44
muirinhoURZZZZ
But we were always going to lose at some point and as I pointed out after the Fulham game, the best measure of the potential of this team is the reaction to a loss/couple of losses. We don't want a 14/15 or 15/16 type end where we just drift away
It was something we were really good at in 16/17, under Stam. For whatever reason, that team had a real belief, and came back from some absolute tonkings. We lost 2 games in a row just three times all season.
We won the games immediately after being beaten 5-0, 7-1, 3-0.
Right now we could easily lose the next 4 games though.
by muirinho » 19 Jan 2020 18:56
Snowflake RoyalmuirinhoURZZZZ
But we were always going to lose at some point and as I pointed out after the Fulham game, the best measure of the potential of this team is the reaction to a loss/couple of losses. We don't want a 14/15 or 15/16 type end where we just drift away
It was something we were really good at in 16/17, under Stam. For whatever reason, that team had a real belief, and came back from some absolute tonkings. We lost 2 games in a row just three times all season.
We won the games immediately after being beaten 5-0, 7-1, 3-0.
Right now we could easily lose the next 4 games though.
Could we?
We've lost 4 games under Bowen, max 2 in a row and we've gone no more than 3 without winning.
by URZZZZ » 20 Jan 2020 10:19
muirinhoSnowflake Royalmuirinho
It was something we were really good at in 16/17, under Stam. For whatever reason, that team had a real belief, and came back from some absolute tonkings. We lost 2 games in a row just three times all season.
We won the games immediately after being beaten 5-0, 7-1, 3-0.
Right now we could easily lose the next 4 games though.
Could we?
We've lost 4 games under Bowen, max 2 in a row and we've gone no more than 3 without winning.
What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.
by Hound » 20 Jan 2020 10:37
URZZZZmuirinhoSnowflake Royal Could we?
We've lost 4 games under Bowen, max 2 in a row and we've gone no more than 3 without winning.
What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.
I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of results
It’s the week after that run I’m concerned about, West Brom, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday
HoundURZZZZmuirinho
What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.
I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of results
It’s the week after that run I’m concerned about, West Brom, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday
the way Leeds and WBA are currently performing, you'd hope for at least a point from each
who knows with Sheff Weds
by muirinho » 20 Jan 2020 14:45
URZZZZmuirinhoSnowflake Royal Could we?
We've lost 4 games under Bowen, max 2 in a row and we've gone no more than 3 without winning.
What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.
I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of results
It’s the week after that run I’m concerned about, West Brom, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday
by URZZZZ » 20 Jan 2020 15:53
muirinhoURZZZZmuirinho
What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.
I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of results
It’s the week after that run I’m concerned about, West Brom, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday
All opinions isn't it? I think Cardiff is losable because Bowen will probably play the U23s, and I'd be more worried about Bristol and Forest than about Wednesday or Leeds.
Hull, yeah, I was mentally including Millwall in my four, even though we'd already played it!
Users browsing this forum: Delboy, Jammy Dodger, windermereROYAL, wolsey and 579 guests