by Westwood52 » 07 Aug 2021 16:46
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Aug 2021 16:46
by Brogue » 07 Aug 2021 16:47
by windermereROYAL » 07 Aug 2021 16:47
tidus_mi2 So are Luton dark horses this season or are Peterborough shit?
by Zip » 07 Aug 2021 16:47
by Simmops » 07 Aug 2021 16:47
SouthDownsRoyal You can’t keep this reading side down!
Top shelf Pauno
Pauno IN
by tidus_mi2 » 07 Aug 2021 16:48
windermereROYALtidus_mi2 So are Luton dark horses this season or are Peterborough shit?
Obviously after one game.
by Jackson Corner » 07 Aug 2021 16:48
by windermereROYAL » 07 Aug 2021 16:48
by genome » 07 Aug 2021 16:49
by Simmops » 07 Aug 2021 16:49
genome 3-2 down, 5 minutes to go, take off a striker and bring on a defender
Classic Pauno sub
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Aug 2021 16:50
RoyalBlueBrogueRoyalBlue
Agreed. They must be drinking/smoking something very strong. If they want to go for the culprits they should be targeting the EFL for leaving us in a situation where we can only realistically name 5 subs.
Yes it’s the EFL’s fault we broke the rules.
It's the EFL's fault for creating ridiculous rules and then sitting on the fence and not giving us any proper form of definitive decision/ruling. It's the EFL's fault that the application of the rules and consequential sanctions appears to be so inconsistent.
And our current situation very certainly isn't the manager's fault which was the main point being made.
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Aug 2021 16:51
genome 3-2 down, 5 minutes to go, take off a striker and bring on a defender
Classic Pauno sub
by windermereROYAL » 07 Aug 2021 16:52
Simmopsgenome 3-2 down, 5 minutes to go, take off a striker and bring on a defender
Classic Pauno sub
are you now Pauno OUT?
by leon » 07 Aug 2021 16:53
by super darren caskey » 07 Aug 2021 16:54
by Brogue » 07 Aug 2021 16:57
by RoyalBlue » 07 Aug 2021 16:57
Snowflake RoyalRoyalBlueBrogue
Yes it’s the EFL’s fault we broke the rules.
It's the EFL's fault for creating ridiculous rules and then sitting on the fence and not giving us any proper form of definitive decision/ruling. It's the EFL's fault that the application of the rules and consequential sanctions appears to be so inconsistent.
And our current situation very certainly isn't the manager's fault which was the main point being made.
It's our fault for overspending for nigh on a decade and doing the bare minimum to get wages down.
It's our fault for giving cup and league debuts to players we didn't want as part of our senior squad knowing the financial position we were in and the rules around them.
It's our fault for handing out long contracts to punts we decide we don't want, can't get rid of and refuse to use.
by Gunny Fishcake » 07 Aug 2021 16:58
by Brogue » 07 Aug 2021 16:59
RoyalBlueSnowflake RoyalRoyalBlue
It's the EFL's fault for creating ridiculous rules and then sitting on the fence and not giving us any proper form of definitive decision/ruling. It's the EFL's fault that the application of the rules and consequential sanctions appears to be so inconsistent.
And our current situation very certainly isn't the manager's fault which was the main point being made.
It's our fault for overspending for nigh on a decade and doing the bare minimum to get wages down.
It's our fault for giving cup and league debuts to players we didn't want as part of our senior squad knowing the financial position we were in and the rules around them.
It's our fault for handing out long contracts to punts we decide we don't want, can't get rid of and refuse to use.
Maybe, but as has been pointed out by others, effectively forcing clubs to release their most valuable assets for pretty much bugger all, thus significantly worsening their financial situation, demonstrates the stupidity of the current EFL approach to FFP. And can the EFL really be excused for sitting on the fence, not reaching/communicating decisions/punishments and leaving clubs in a dangerous damaging limbo?
Users browsing this forum: GURoyal, Mr Angry, Tinpot Royal, Who Moved The Goalposts? and 145 guests