#SellBeforeWeDai (to someone fit and proper)“ supporters action group

[NathStPaul]

This is it!

https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19

Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!

Why are Bournemouth in hell? They are a midtable Premier League side.

[Hound]

Let’s hope this is Huang Kad the bizarrely itk not Huang Kad the clueless muppet then

[Winston Biscuit]

This is it!

https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19

Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!

What about your online petition?!

[Snowflake Royal]

Wonder how far we’d be from being self sustainable if we

Sold the training ground
Sold off Smith, Wing, Knibbs, Savage and Azeez (compensation) in the summer and any academy lads we could
Found a cheap training ground
Disbanded the Academy
Continued to use the SCL which remains owned by Yongge and we continue to pay the 1m p/a or whatever it was

Be a fairly miserable existence but possibility that’s where it’s going

We shouldn't bin off the Academy but taking it down to a Cat 3 with room to expand is sensible. Trying to keep as much C1 talent as we can selling pathway to professional football and stepping stone.

We 100% can't sustain C1 in L1 let alone L2.

[Snowflake Royal]

Wonder how far we’d be from being self sustainable if we

Sold the training ground
Sold off Smith, Wing, Knibbs, Savage and Azeez (compensation) in the summer and any academy lads we could
Found a cheap training ground
Disbanded the Academy
Continued to use the SCL which remains owned by Yongge and we continue to pay the 1m p/a or whatever it was

Be a fairly miserable existence but possibility that’s where it’s going

Very plausible imo. But eventually he'd leave somehow. We'd probably be looking at boycotts to force his hand.

If he rents the SCL to us, we simply confirm the deal and whether he's responsible for maintenance (likely ) then oxf*rd trash it every week.

[Lower West]

Wonder how far we’d be from being self sustainable if we

Sold the training ground
Sold off Smith, Wing, Knibbs, Savage and Azeez (compensation) in the summer and any academy lads we could
Found a cheap training ground
Disbanded the Academy
Continued to use the SCL which remains owned by Yongge and we continue to pay the 1m p/a or whatever it was

Be a fairly miserable existence but possibility that’s where it’s going

Very plausible imo. But eventually he'd leave somehow. We'd probably be looking at boycotts to force his hand.

If he rents the SCL to us, we simply confirm the deal and whether he's responsible for maintenance (likely ) then oxf*rd trash it every week.

Dai has to sell the ground!

Finally found the ruling that was published on 9th January 2024. Missed it before. Knew that was an ongoing external financial investigation since 2022. Dai and two subsidiary companies controlled by him. That became part of the China Dili Group. Has been ordered by the courts to repay £128 million pounds (debt and interest). That was taken out in bank loans.

Dai needs to repay the cash that he presumably used most of to fund his football club ventures. Liquidatating everything he owns. Doubt he'll ever be seen in the UK again.

[SouthDownsRoyal]

Bonus points for getting the word bozo on the banner

[SouthDownsRoyal]

This is it!

https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19

Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!

Why are Bournemouth in hell? They are a midtable Premier League side.

lol

[SouthDownsRoyal]

This is it!

https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19

Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!

What about your online petition?!

[Sutekh]

So let's say this is true. Shame they couldn't broker it time before Dai got his asset stripping idea over the line.

Let's hope it works out more



Rather than

[The Green Programme]

When are we going to start violent protests with weapons and smashing the place up?

A ‘regulator’!!!!

It’s such a bizarre response.

Just think about what you are saying.

Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)

Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?

And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….

Be careful what you wish for.

The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….

Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….

Hurray for regulation…...

We will be paying for it for years and years….

We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….

Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.

Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.

The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..

Hurray for FFP….

You’re a fool

And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.

The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.

The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..

That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.

It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).

No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.

[From Despair To Where?]

So who imposes the real time penalties? Not the clubs if they're self regulating and the whole system is set up to encourage recklessness.

Hence the call for an independent regulator. The government can then legislate that It be funded by the multi billion pound TV deal. It would cost less than Harry Maguire.

[Snowflake Royal]

A ‘regulator’!!!!

It’s such a bizarre response.

Just think about what you are saying.

Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)

Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?

And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….

Be careful what you wish for.

The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….

Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….

Hurray for regulation…...

We will be paying for it for years and years….

We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….

Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.

Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.

The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..

Hurray for FFP….

You’re a fool

And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.

The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.

The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..

That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.

It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).

No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.

Unusually kind from leon.

You're worse than a fool.

[Elm Park Kid]

A ‘regulator’!!!!

It’s such a bizarre response.

Just think about what you are saying.

Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)

Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?

And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….

Be careful what you wish for.

The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….

Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….

Hurray for regulation…...

We will be paying for it for years and years….

We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….

Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.

Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.

The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..

Hurray for FFP….

You’re a fool

And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.

The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.

The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..

That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.

It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).

No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.

Wow, someone's been reading their 'Atlas Shrugged'

[Loafer]

A ‘regulator’!!!!

It’s such a bizarre response.

Just think about what you are saying.

Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)

Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?

And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….

Be careful what you wish for.

The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….

Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….

Hurray for regulation…...

We will be paying for it for years and years….

We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….

Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.

Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.

The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..

Hurray for FFP….

You’re a fool

And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.

The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.

The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..

That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.

It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).

No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.

STFU

[From Despair To Where?]

I wouldn't pay any attention to The Green Programme. He was singing Dai's praises when he gave Moore £35k a week and we spent £15m on 2 strikers days after coming out of a soft embargo. Apparently it showed ambition.

[NathStPaul]

I wouldn't pay any attention to The Green Programme. He was singing Dai's praises when he gave Moore £35k a week and we spent £15m on 2 strikers days after coming out of a soft embargo. Apparently it showed ambition.

I'll get him added to the teamboard bellend spreadsheet.

[leon]

A ‘regulator’!!!!

It’s such a bizarre response.

Just think about what you are saying.

Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)

Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?

And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….

Be careful what you wish for.

The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….

Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….

Hurray for regulation…...

We will be paying for it for years and years….

We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….

Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.

Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.

The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..

Hurray for FFP….

You’re a fool

And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.

The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.

The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..

That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.

It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).

No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.

You wouldn't know an economic theory if slapped your face with its cock and least of all be able to explain it,

[Loafer]

I wouldn't pay any attention to The Green Programme. He was singing Dai's praises when he gave Moore £35k a week and we spent £15m on 2 strikers days after coming out of a soft embargo. Apparently it showed ambition.

I'll get him added to the teamboard bellend spreadsheet.

Who else is in this spreadsheet?

[72 bus]

I wouldn't pay any attention to The Green Programme. He was singing Dai's praises when he gave Moore £35k a week and we spent £15m on 2 strikers days after coming out of a soft embargo. Apparently it showed ambition.

I'll get him added to the teamboard bellend spreadsheet.

Who else is in this spreadsheet?

You and Nath